-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
E2E Playwright Migration: convert Admin Disputes spec #10123
Conversation
Test the buildOption 1. Jetpack Beta
Option 2. Jurassic Ninja - available for logged-in A12s🚀 Launch a JN site with this branch 🚀 ℹ️ Install this Tampermonkey script to get more options. Build info:
Note: the build is updated when a new commit is pushed to this PR. |
Size Change: 0 B Total Size: 1.36 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The spec runs nicely, passing consistently, and is well written.
I left a couple of nitpicks, but since none of them are blockers, I'm approving this PR.
Thanks for working on this one! 🚢
expect( | ||
page | ||
.getByRole( 'heading', { | ||
name: 'Disputes', | ||
} ) | ||
.nth( 1 ) | ||
).toBeVisible(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nitpick: This part is a bit hard to read. One way to improve that would be to remove the extra comma after "Disputes", so it can be formatted in a single line.
expect( | |
page | |
.getByRole( 'heading', { | |
name: 'Disputes', | |
} ) | |
.nth( 1 ) | |
).toBeVisible(); | |
expect( | |
page.getByRole( 'heading', { name: 'Disputes' } ).nth( 1 ) | |
).toBeVisible(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the suggestion, applied in 3d48cdf
await page | ||
.locator( '.woocommerce-table__table.is-loading' ) | ||
.waitFor( { state: 'hidden' } ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nitpick: The .waitFor()
works great, but the { state: 'hidden' }
makes it less obvious. Another alternative would be to change it to expect().toHaveCount()
.
await page | |
.locator( '.woocommerce-table__table.is-loading' ) | |
.waitFor( { state: 'hidden' } ); | |
await expect( | |
page.locator( '.woocommerce-table__table.is-loading' ) | |
).toHaveCount( 0 ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, this is more clear to define what is expected of the test. Updated in 3d48cdf
Fixes #9959
Changes proposed in this Pull Request
Testing instructions
npm run changelog
to add a changelog file, choosepatch
to leave it empty if the change is not significant. You can add multiple changelog files in one PR by running this command a few times.Post merge