Is this module abandoned?

[pocesar]

No PRs being accepted, no bugs being fixed, what gives? Maybe someone should take this over?

[truongsinh]

+1, i'm waiting for opinion on #98 , otherwise in 24 hours I'll decide on my own and begin to contact other PR authors to call for a take over.

[ananthakumaran]

+1

[HarryPehkonen]

Please leave a link here if there is any kind of organized take-over on this. I'm apprehensive about using expect.js because of lack of maintenance, but there aren't many libraries like this that run on ie8.

[truongsinh]

@HarryPehkonen true! the only reason I don't use chai is because it only support IE9+

[truongsinh]

https://github.com/truongsinh/expect I have been lately working on this fork. Please read "read me" and history.md for more info, as there are breaking changes. I will now start asking for npm and bower package name.

[rauchg]

What are the main bugs you'd like to see fixed? We use this for socket.io and engine.io and never run into issues.

[truongsinh]

@guille are you asking me or others? For others, as said, this codebase has been abandoned for 8 months, until hours ago (thanks for getting back after my email, though), however there are still open 14 PRs, most of which are fixes, with test case provided. For I myself, I found it is hard to extend expect, because of its structure, you can take a look @ my fork's Readme.

Anyway, I'm happy that you come back.

[truongsinh]

@guille ping, any write up? You said in another issue that you believed expect.js is no longer the solution. However, I and many people here find this the only one supporting IE8 (by scarifying the extendability, like of chaijs's, but I rewrite it in my fork).

[rauchg]

http://www.devthought.com/2014/02/26/the-modular-approach-to-testing/

[shime]

is this package still maintained?

if you're looking for maintainers, please add that to the readme. if not, please add it to the readme.

[EvanHahn]

I forked this and created Expecting.js which I intend to maintain.