Makes vaurca surgery consistent #20078
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
!review |
DreamySkrell
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2024
alsoandanswer
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It seems rather silly to have a 15% chance of making the situation worse when operating on vaurca, when there is no equivalent for humans, etc.
Yes, this is a salt PR after the random chance just killed a Ta by deleting her phoron tank.
I could see an argument for keeping it in since incision management systems have no failure rate, but I don't see those that often, especially in low pop. I guess it made the round more interesting but..