-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure that this works with fusermount, fusermount3, ... fusermountN #10
Comments
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Looks like the compiled-in Stuff like this is the reason why I was using Using Alma Linux is already now putting Xorg into |
Opened an discussion thread in the FUSE project: |
Currently on a system without FUSE, we get:
We need to check to ensure that this works with FUSE2 and FUSE3 (and future) versions of
fusermount
(to be more specific, that at least it attempts to).E.g.,
fusermount3
is available; if yes, use thatfusermount
is available; if yes, use that (so that AppImages continue to work on pre-libfuse3 systems)fusermount4
is available; if yes, use that (so that once distribtions drop libfuse3 in favor of libfuse4, pre-existing AppImages at least attempt to run - FUSE unfortunately doesn't see a need to guarantee anything, but not even trying means guaranteed failure)Currently,
fusermount3
seems to be hardocded in libfuse:https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/blob/010d820131adc2059d3b2516991ebaa16dc0bdd9/lib/mount.c#L44
If libfuse would allow to pass in a
FUSERMOUNT_PROG
environment variable, that would allow us do do the job nicely.Possibly we might want to engage in libfuse GitHub Discussions to elaborate on our use case and why a future stability guarantee for
fusermount
would be very important for it.References:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: