You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using Cesium is a bootstrap-based page and the InfoBox title looks like the below:
Bootstrap uses normalize.css under the hood. Order or css inclusion seems to have no effect. Given the enormous popularity of these libraries, we should probably look into this sooner rather than later.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This makes it "easier for everyone to understand" or something like that, but also makes it different from the old default behavior (which is box-sizing: content-box;).
The fix is, we should explicitly specify a box-sizing model on any Cesium widgets that depend on width, or height, or a combination of top / bottom, or combo left / right. This will take some searching through the CSS to make sure we got all the places, but it's the only way to be tolerant of different global default box-sizing settings.
In the specific example above, the fix is: .cesium-infoBox-title { box-sizing: content-box; }
@emackey, hopefully this is an easy fix.
I'm using Cesium is a bootstrap-based page and the InfoBox title looks like the below:
Bootstrap uses normalize.css under the hood. Order or css inclusion seems to have no effect. Given the enormous popularity of these libraries, we should probably look into this sooner rather than later.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: