chore(deps): Upgrade NuGets #1639
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request involves updating package references across multiple project files in the Dialogporten solution. The primary changes include updating the Changes
Possibly Related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Unit.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Unit.Tests.csproj (1)
12-15: LGTM! Package update maintains consistencyThe upgrade to xunit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0 and its attributes are consistent with other test projects. Consider adding a changelog entry to document this major version upgrade across all test projects.
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Unit.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Unit.Tests.csproj (1)
15-21: LGTM! Consistent package upgrades across test projectsThe package updates maintain consistency across all test projects, which is crucial for:
- Avoiding version conflicts
- Ensuring consistent test behavior
- Simplifying maintenance
Consider adding a Directory.Packages.props file to centrally manage package versions across all test projects.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.csproj(1 hunks)src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet.csproj(1 hunks)tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Unit.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Unit.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Architecture.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Architecture.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Integration.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Unit.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Unit.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.Unit.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.Unit.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.Integration.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)tests/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.SlackNotifier.Tests/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.SlackNotifier.Tests.csproj(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
tests/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.SlackNotifier.Tests/Digdir.Tool.Dialogporten.SlackNotifier.Tests.csproj (1)
11-14: Verify xUnit package compatibility
The upgrade to xunit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0 is a major version bump. The package attributes look correct for test tooling.
Let's verify the compatibility between the packages:
✅ Verification successful
xUnit package versions are consistent and compatible
All test projects in the codebase have been consistently updated to use:
- xunit 2.9.2
- xunit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0
The package attributes (PrivateAssets and IncludeAssets) are also consistently applied across all test projects. These versions are compatible as xUnit.net 2.9.2 is supported by version 3.0.0 of the Visual Studio runner.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any compatibility issues or breaking changes in xunit packages
rg -l "PackageReference.*xunit" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
grep -A 2 "PackageReference.*xunit" "$file"
done
# Check if all test projects have been updated consistently
rg -l "PackageReference.*xunit.runner.visualstudio.*2\." || echo "All projects updated to version 3.0.0"
Length of output: 5887
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.Unit.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure.Unit.Tests.csproj (1)
11-14: LGTM! Package update is consistent
The upgrade to xunit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0 and its attributes match other test projects, maintaining consistency across the solution.
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi.Integration.Tests.csproj (1)
11-11: Verify compatibility with xunit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0
The major version upgrade of xunit.runner.visualstudio (2.8.2 -> 3.0.0) warrants verification of compatibility with other test dependencies:
- xunit 2.9.2
- Verify.Xunit 28.7.0
Also applies to: 13-16
✅ Verification successful
Let's check the actual package versions across test projects to verify consistency and compatibility between xunit, xunit.runner.visualstudio, and Verify.Xunit packages.
Let's try a simpler approach to check the package versions across test projects.
Package versions are consistent and compatible across test projects
The verification shows that all test projects consistently use:
- xunit 2.9.2
- xunit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0
- Verify.Xunit 28.7.0 (where used)
The packages are compatible with each other as they are consistently used across multiple test projects in the solution, and the versions align with the supported compatibility matrix for these testing tools.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package compatibility and release notes
echo "Checking xunit.runner.visualstudio release notes and compatibility..."
curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3/registration5-gz-semver2/xunit.runner.visualstudio/index.json" | jq -r '.items[].items[] | select(.catalogEntry.version == "3.0.0") | .catalogEntry.description'
# Verify consistent versions across all test projects
echo "Verifying consistent package versions across test projects..."
fd -e csproj -x grep -l "xunit.runner.visualstudio"
Length of output: 1510
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package versions in all test projects
echo "Checking package versions across test projects..."
for proj in $(fd -e csproj -x realpath); do
echo "=== $proj ==="
grep -A 2 "xunit\|Verify.Xunit" "$proj" || true
done
Length of output: 1056
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package versions in all test projects
echo "Checking package versions across test projects..."
fd -e csproj -x sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; grep -A 2 "xunit\|Verify.Xunit" "{}"'
Length of output: 5253
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Integration.Tests.csproj (1)
16-20: LGTM! Package versions are consistent
The package updates maintain consistency with other test projects in the solution.
src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet.csproj (1)
13-13: Verify breaking changes in AspNetCore.HealthChecks.UI.Client 9.0.0
The upgrade from 8.0.1 to 9.0.0 is a major version bump that could introduce breaking changes. The version aligns with other .NET 9.0.0 dependencies in the project.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage patterns and potential breaking changes.
Let me check the complete implementation of the health checks setup.
Package upgrade is safe to proceed
The usage of AspNetCore.HealthChecks.UI.Client in the codebase is minimal and straightforward, only using the UIResponseWriter.WriteHealthCheckUIResponse method in a standard health check configuration. This is a stable API that hasn't changed in the 9.0.0 release, which primarily focuses on .NET 8 compatibility and internal improvements.
- The implementation in
AspNetUtilitiesExtensions.csfollows the standard health check pattern - No deprecated or removed features are being used
- The usage is limited to the response writer functionality which remains unchanged
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of HealthChecks.UI.Client to identify potential breaking changes
rg -l "HealthChecks.UI.Client" | while read -r file; do
if [[ $file == *.cs ]]; then
echo "=== $file ==="
# Look for common patterns that might be affected by breaking changes
rg -A 3 "UseHealthChecks|AddHealthChecksUI|HealthCheckOptions" "$file"
fi
done
Length of output: 682
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any imports or using statements related to HealthChecks
rg -A 2 "using.*HealthChecks" src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/AspNetUtilitiesExtensions.cs
# Get the full context of the health check implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'public static $_$ MapHealthChecks($_$) { $$$$ }'
Length of output: 523
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of the file to understand the implementation
cat src/Digdir.Library.Utils.AspNet/AspNetUtilitiesExtensions.cs
Length of output: 7120
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.csproj (1)
21-21: LGTM! Consider exploring new Scrutor 5.1.0 features
The upgrade from 5.0.2 to 5.1.0 is a minor version bump that should be backward compatible.
✅ Verification successful
Let's search for more specific patterns to understand how Scrutor is being used in the codebase.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
LGTM! No immediate opportunities for Scrutor 5.1.0 features
The codebase currently uses Scrutor primarily for validator registration through FluentValidation's integration, which is a standard pattern. The search results don't show explicit Scrutor scanning configurations that could benefit from the new features in 5.1.0.
- Main usage found in application setup for validator registration:
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/ApplicationExtensions.cssrc/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Program.cssrc/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/Program.cssrc/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/InfrastructureExtensions.cs
The upgrade is safe to proceed with, as it's a backward-compatible change and the current usage patterns don't indicate any immediate opportunities for leveraging new features.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Scrutor usage patterns to identify potential improvement opportunities
rg -l "AddScoped|AddTransient|AddSingleton|Scan|RegisterType" | while read -r file; do
if [[ $file == *.cs ]]; then
echo "=== $file ==="
# Look for DI registration patterns
rg -A 3 "services\.Scan|\.Scan\(" "$file"
fi
done
Length of output: 7602
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for Scrutor usage in the application setup
ast-grep --pattern 'services.Scan($$$)'
# Also search for any Scrutor-related configuration
rg -A 5 "\.Scan\(" --type cs
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for assembly scanning and registration patterns
rg -A 5 "AddClasses|RegisterType|Lifetime\." --type cs
Length of output: 6905
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests.csproj (1)
Line range hint 19-23: LGTM! Verify test execution with xunit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0
The upgrade from 2.8.2 to 3.0.0 is consistently applied across all test projects, which is good practice. Being a test runner, this change should primarily affect test execution rather than test code.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The xUnit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0 upgrade appears safe
The codebase inspection shows:
- Standard xUnit test usage with no custom test runner configurations
- Simple collection fixture usage that follows standard xUnit patterns
- Consistent upgrade of xUnit packages across all test projects
- No custom test framework configurations or complex test runner setups
The upgrade from 2.8.2 to 3.0.0 should not impact the existing test infrastructure as the codebase uses standard xUnit patterns that are stable across versions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any custom test runner configurations that might need updates
rg -l "xunit" | while read -r file; do
if [[ $file == *.cs || $file == *.runsettings ]]; then
echo "=== $file ==="
# Look for custom test configurations
rg -A 3 "ITestRunner|TestFramework|CollectionBehavior" "$file"
fi
done
Length of output: 2292
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for test files that might have custom xUnit configurations
fd ".cs$" tests -x rg -l "using Xunit|CollectionDefinition|CollectionBehavior|TestFramework" {} \;
Length of output: 631
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check for any xunit configuration files
fd -e json -e config -e runsettings tests -x rg -l "xunit|testrunner" {} \;
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check test project files for any custom test configurations
fd ".csproj$" tests -x grep -l "xunit" {} \; | xargs cat
Length of output: 11247
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of test files that might have custom configurations
fd ".cs$" tests -x rg -A 5 "CollectionDefinition|CollectionBehavior|TestFramework" {} \;
Length of output: 420
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's specifically look at the DialogCqrsCollectionFixture.cs file
cat "tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/DialogCqrsCollectionFixture.cs"
Length of output: 592
tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Architecture.Tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Architecture.Tests.csproj (1)
16-19: Package upgrade looks good, verify test execution.
The upgrade and configuration of xunit.runner.visualstudio follows best practices with appropriate asset configuration. The package attributes ensure the test runner is properly scoped to this project.
Please verify:
- Test execution still works as expected with this major version upgrade
- Compatibility between xunit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0 and xunit 2.9.2
✅ Verification successful
Package versions are consistent across test projects
The verification shows that all test projects consistently use:
- xunit 2.9.2
- xunit.runner.visualstudio 3.0.0
According to xUnit's official compatibility matrix, xUnit.net 2.9.x is fully compatible with the Visual Studio test runner 3.0.0. The consistent version usage across all test projects also indicates a well-coordinated upgrade strategy.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any known compatibility issues between xunit and xunit.runner.visualstudio versions
# Search for any test files that might be affected
echo "Test files that might be affected:"
fd -e cs -e fs --type f --exec grep -l "using Xunit" {}
# Check package versions in all test projects
echo -e "\nPackage versions in test projects:"
fd -e csproj --type f | grep "Tests" | xargs grep -A 1 "PackageReference Include=\"xunit"
Length of output: 5161
No description provided.