Number workflows

[chantelleleveille]

Main Goal: Update workflow names to indicate which figure in the paper they generate.

For review:

• please confirm if you like this numbering/naming convention
• @cfrick13 Please double check s2 and s3 and s18. I did not rename your base workflow files because I wasn't 100p sure what came from where!
• s17 I think is a code free figure? or can you confirm what workflow it is associated with.

Bonus one line bug fix:

• Full tracks dataframe was not sorted by index sequence and it was causing plots to look crazy!

---

All workflows succeeded!

Well except these two but they fail for known reasons (new density metric needs to be updated) and will be addressed in a different PR!

figure_s12_feeding_control (178.8s) (23.6GB). KeyError "['2d_area_nuc_cell_ratio'] not in index". See stack trace above.
figure_s6_s16_inhibitors (92.0s) (10.7GB). KeyError "['2d_area_nuc_cell_ratio'] not in index". See stack trace above.

[jcass11]

• Checked all the new referenced fig numbers and they all match the right figures ✅
• Naming convention and organization all looks good to me
• Yes I believe S17 is code-free
• Thanks for the bug fix!

[jcass11]

Sounds like @chantelleleveille is going to run all workflows so I am approving without running. Thank you!

[pgarrison]

Nice!!