Create In-Place Variants for new Wedges

[GeorgeR227]

PR #201 introduced new wedge operators for various dual cases but as of now these are all out-of-place operators. Mirroring the pp wedges structure, we should include wrappers to provide an in-place and an out-of-place version for dec_matrix_generate and update gensim to unlock this functionality for simulation generation.

[lukem12345]

Good catch, George. Could you make a quick set of instructions for how to add such support?

[GeorgeR227]

1. Create a wrapper that generates both the in-place and out-of-place functions and returns them as a tuple in that order. See

   Decapodes.jl/src/operators.jl

   Line 97 in 393e327

   function dec_pair_wedge_product(::Type{Tuple{k,0}}, sd::HasDeltaSet) where {k}

   as an example, your actual implementation may differ based what the function looks like.
2. Add the symbols for those wedge products into the set extra_dec_operators here

   Decapodes.jl/src/simulation.jl

   Line 513 in 393e327

   extra_dec_operators = Set([:⋆₁⁻¹, :∧₀₁, :∧₁₀, :∧₁₁, :∧₀₂, :∧₂₀])

   This is just a collection of non-matrix but in-place operators.

That should be it but it's been a while since I've done this and I remember the solution to getting the wedge to work was kinda hacky. Lmk if anything goes awry.

[lukem12345]

We will hold off on this feature since it would be best to introduce the in-place version of these operators at the same time we add GPU support for these operators. GPU kernels are always in-place.

[lukem12345]

This issue can be addressed by the current push in CombinatorialSpaces towards kernelizing operators AlgebraicJulia/CombinatorialSpaces.jl#113 In-place operators and their GPU versions are now one-and-the-same.