-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds request-direct-access-url file name option #197
Open
canpan14
wants to merge
5
commits into
Alfresco:master
Choose a base branch
from
canpan14:feature/2064-request-direct-access-url-file-name-option
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f9de6d8
Adds request-direct-access-url file name option
canpan14 755de29
Add file name in response and fix expiryTime typo
canpan14 62a47d7
Merge branch 'Alfresco:master' into feature/2064-request-direct-acces…
canpan14 62f240d
Undo expiresAt fix
canpan14 5ad616c
Merge branch 'feature/2064-request-direct-access-url-file-name-option…
canpan14 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we'd usually have the items from the "Create" entity in the response too - i.e.
DirectAccessUrl
below. I don't think this is explicitly called out in the v1 API guidelines though.I've added our architect team to review too, since they usually review additions to the v1 API.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could add it to the
DirectAccessUrl
class in alfresco-community-repo, but it looks like the current object structure is fed in from the content store itself. Not exactly sure where that code is or how dangerous it is to alter.I could make a
DirectAccessUrlResponse
class for the purposes of extending and adding on the additional field.It's not hard to return the field, I just want to keep things in line with your expectations for the code base as a whole.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tpage-alfresco is correct, please make sure to add the file name to the response too.
In terms of implementation, you have already modified the
ContentServiceImpl
class, so adding an attribute toDirectAccessUrl
(part of our Java public API) is not a problem.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jamalkm The issue is the call to the content store serialized directly into
DirectAccessUrl
. While the serialization might still work with an extra field added, I worry it might start to diverge from representing the data object actually returned from the database vs. what we are returning from the API.I can still open a PR on it though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alfresco/alfresco-community-repo#2081
Let me know if this is what you were looking for.