[ACS-5511] create library playwright tests

[azakrzewski-hy]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• The commit message follows our guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• Documentation
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behaviour? (You can also link to an open issue here)

Test for create library on ACA is written in Protractor

What is the new behaviour?

Test for create library is written in Playwright

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")

• Yes
• No

If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...

Other information:

Method: "goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName()" has "isVisible()" - this is not exact as "expect()" but does validation.
Do you think after "goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName()" method, validation of the row should be done in expect() still ? e.g.:
await myLibrariesPage.dataTable.goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName(libraryName);
await expect(myLibrariesPage.dataTable.getRowByName(libraryName)).toBeVisible();

Or maybe we should put "goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName()" inside expect() ? e.g.:
expect(myLibrariesPage.dataTable.goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName(libraryName));

[azakrzewski-hy]

Repeating my question from "Other information" part of the description of this PR:

Method: "goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName()" has "isVisible()" - this is not exact as "expect()" but does validation.
Do you think after "goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName()" method, validation of the row should be done in expect() still ? e.g.:
await myLibrariesPage.dataTable.goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName(libraryName);
await expect(myLibrariesPage.dataTable.getRowByName(libraryName)).toBeVisible();

Or maybe we should put "goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName()" inside expect() ? e.g.:
expect(myLibrariesPage.dataTable.goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName(libraryName));

Mentioned method "goThroughPagesLookingForRowWithName()" is used in other methods as well and it takes time that we can run out for a test ( timeout 45000).
Please let me know what do you think of it?