Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OPSEXP-1372 - switch to FQN (part 2 - acs, check-versions and prerequisite_checks playbooks) #420

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

piraartur
Copy link
Contributor

@piraartur piraartur commented Sep 5, 2022

Creating this draft PR as a separate branch from OPSEXP-1372, with changes to acs playbook

@pr-triage pr-triage bot added the PR: draft label Sep 5, 2022
@piraartur piraartur self-assigned this Sep 5, 2022
@piraartur piraartur marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2022 12:38
@piraartur piraartur requested a review from alxgomz September 5, 2022 12:38
@piraartur piraartur changed the title Opsexp 1372 2 Opsexp 1372 (part 2) Sep 5, 2022
@piraartur piraartur changed the title Opsexp 1372 (part 2) Opsexp 1372 (part 2 - acs, check-versions and prerequisite_checks playbooks) Sep 5, 2022
@piraartur piraartur changed the title Opsexp 1372 (part 2 - acs, check-versions and prerequisite_checks playbooks) Opsexp 1372 - switch to FQN (part 2 - acs, check-versions and prerequisite_checks playbooks) Sep 5, 2022
@piraartur piraartur requested a review from a team September 5, 2022 12:52
@gionn gionn changed the title Opsexp 1372 - switch to FQN (part 2 - acs, check-versions and prerequisite_checks playbooks) OPSEXP-1372 - switch to FQN (part 2 - acs, check-versions and prerequisite_checks playbooks) Sep 6, 2022
gionn
gionn previously approved these changes Sep 6, 2022
@piraartur piraartur closed this Sep 6, 2022
@gionn gionn deleted the OPSEXP-1372-2 branch September 6, 2022 10:34
@piraartur
Copy link
Contributor Author

#421 had introduced these changes, as being branch created with commit history from this part, whic merged before this one had chance. Closing it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants