Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bpf_conformance should add test for BPF_JMP32 class #171

Closed
Alan-Jowett opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #181
Closed

bpf_conformance should add test for BPF_JMP32 class #171

Alan-Jowett opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #181

Comments

@Alan-Jowett
Copy link
Owner

The BPF_JMP instruction has two forms:

  1. Target is in offset.
  2. Targe is in imm.

Currently there are only test for the first case.
@dthaler
Copy link
Collaborator

dthaler commented Jan 15, 2024

This issue is a duplicate of the 5th bullet of #152.
However I can update that one to point to this one.

@dthaler dthaler mentioned this issue Jan 15, 2024
Closed
4 tasks
dthaler added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2024
@dthaler
Add support for BMP_JMP32 class
64a4ee8 
Tested with ebpf-verifier

Fixes #171

Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <[email protected]>
@dthaler dthaler mentioned this issue Jan 16, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add support for BMP_JMP32 class Alan-Jowett/bpf_conformance
2 participants
@dthaler @Alan-Jowett