feat(multichain-testing): `stakeIca` contract e2e test #9534

0xpatrickdev · 2024-06-19T17:26:22Z

closes: #8896

Description

Adds e2e tests and relevant tooling for stakeIca.contract.js to multichain-testing. More specifically:

Adds multichain-testing/tools/deploy.ts to: 1) build a contract and proposal with agoric run (local bin), 2) copy files to container 3) run installBundles and runCoreEval
Adds logic to gather chain info from the starship environment (registry node on localhost:8081) and execute revise-chain-info proposal in local testing and CI
Tests happy-path wallet flows of stakeIca via stakeOsmo and stakeAtom instances

Areas for improvement:

Notifiers for wallet offer results are not working correctly here. Instead of relying on them for wallet offer results we are polling vstorage on an interval (see makeRetryUntilCondition) for the initial offer, and verify the behavior by querying state on remote chains. If an offer result results in an error, that is not currently captured until orchestration e2e testing: validate offer results #9643

cloudflare-workers-and-pages · 2024-06-20T03:44:10Z

Deploying agoric-sdk with Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	`55f1896`
Status:	✅ Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://26faff3b.agoric-sdk.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://9042-stake-atom-e2e-rebased.agoric-sdk.pages.dev

View logs

refs: #8896 ## Description Extracted from #9534 to focus that PR on multichain and lighten the review. Also it had merge conflicts with master that this resolves. ### Security Considerations nothing new ### Scaling Considerations no ### Documentation Considerations none ### Testing Considerations new coverage ### Upgrade Considerations none

LuqiPan

Some initial comments

LuqiPan · 2024-06-25T01:01:51Z

multichain-testing/README.md

-
-```sh
-make setup-kind
+make setup


I'm seeing an error running this command but I'm not quite sure why. Did you happen to see this error before?

Expand to see logs(it's long)

make setup bash /Users/luqi/github/Agoric/agoric-sdk/multichain-testing/scripts/dev-setup.sh All binaries are installed kind create cluster --name agship Creating cluster "agship" ... ✓ Ensuring node image (kindest/node:v1.30.0) 🖼 ✓ Preparing nodes 📦 ✓ Writing configuration 📜 ✗ Starting control-plane 🕹️ Deleted nodes: ["agship-control-plane"] ERROR: failed to create cluster: failed to init node with kubeadm: command "docker exec --privileged agship-control-plane kubeadm init --skip-phases=preflight --config=/kind/kubeadm.conf --skip-token-print --v=6" failed with error: exit status 1 Command Output: I0625 00:52:21.621598 139 initconfiguration.go:260] loading configuration from "/kind/kubeadm.conf" W0625 00:52:21.631689 139 initconfiguration.go:348] [config] WARNING: Ignored YAML document with GroupVersionKind kubeadm.k8s.io/v1beta3, Kind=JoinConfiguration [init] Using Kubernetes version: v1.30.0 [certs] Using certificateDir folder "/etc/kubernetes/pki" I0625 00:52:21.660190 139 certs.go:112] creating a new certificate authority for ca [certs] Generating "ca" certificate and key I0625 00:52:21.832105 139 certs.go:483] validating certificate period for ca certificate [certs] Generating "apiserver" certificate and key [certs] apiserver serving cert is signed for DNS names [agship-control-plane kubernetes kubernetes.default kubernetes.default.svc kubernetes.default.svc.cluster.local localhost] and IPs [10.96.0.1 172.18.0.2 127.0.0.1] [certs] Generating "apiserver-kubelet-client" certificate and key I0625 00:52:22.096770 139 certs.go:112] creating a new certificate authority for front-proxy-ca [certs] Generating "front-proxy-ca" certificate and key I0625 00:52:22.191994 139 certs.go:483] validating certificate period for front-proxy-ca certificate [certs] Generating "front-proxy-client" certificate and key I0625 00:52:22.277570 139 certs.go:112] creating a new certificate authority for etcd-ca [certs] Generating "etcd/ca" certificate and key I0625 00:52:22.389020 139 certs.go:483] validating certificate period for etcd/ca certificate [certs] Generating "etcd/server" certificate and key [certs] etcd/server serving cert is signed for DNS names [agship-control-plane localhost] and IPs [172.18.0.2 127.0.0.1 ::1] [certs] Generating "etcd/peer" certificate and key [certs] etcd/peer serving cert is signed for DNS names [agship-control-plane localhost] and IPs [172.18.0.2 127.0.0.1 ::1] [certs] Generating "etcd/healthcheck-client" certificate and key [certs] Generating "apiserver-etcd-client" certificate and key I0625 00:52:22.775910 139 certs.go:78] creating new public/private key files for signing service account users [certs] Generating "sa" key and public key [kubeconfig] Using kubeconfig folder "/etc/kubernetes" I0625 00:52:22.918423 139 kubeconfig.go:112] creating kubeconfig file for admin.conf [kubeconfig] Writing "admin.conf" kubeconfig file I0625 00:52:23.175013 139 kubeconfig.go:112] creating kubeconfig file for super-admin.conf [kubeconfig] Writing "super-admin.conf" kubeconfig file I0625 00:52:23.303598 139 kubeconfig.go:112] creating kubeconfig file for kubelet.conf [kubeconfig] Writing "kubelet.conf" kubeconfig file I0625 00:52:23.472604 139 kubeconfig.go:112] creating kubeconfig file for controller-manager.conf [kubeconfig] Writing "controller-manager.conf" kubeconfig file I0625 00:52:23.680414 139 kubeconfig.go:112] creating kubeconfig file for scheduler.conf [kubeconfig] Writing "scheduler.conf" kubeconfig file [etcd] Creating static Pod manifest for local etcd in "/etc/kubernetes/manifests" I0625 00:52:23.816255 139 local.go:65] [etcd] wrote Static Pod manifest for a local etcd member to "/etc/kubernetes/manifests/etcd.yaml" [control-plane] Using manifest folder "/etc/kubernetes/manifests" [control-plane] Creating static Pod manifest for "kube-apiserver" I0625 00:52:23.816525 139 manifests.go:103] [control-plane] getting StaticPodSpecs I0625 00:52:23.817755 139 certs.go:483] validating certificate period for CA certificate I0625 00:52:23.818030 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "ca-certs" for component "kube-apiserver" I0625 00:52:23.818044 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "etc-ca-certificates" for component "kube-apiserver" I0625 00:52:23.818046 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "k8s-certs" for component "kube-apiserver" I0625 00:52:23.818048 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "usr-local-share-ca-certificates" for component "kube-apiserver" I0625 00:52:23.818050 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "usr-share-ca-certificates" for component "kube-apiserver" [control-plane] Creating static Pod manifest for "kube-controller-manager" I0625 00:52:23.818464 139 manifests.go:158] [control-plane] wrote static Pod manifest for component "kube-apiserver" to "/etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-apiserver.yaml" I0625 00:52:23.818475 139 manifests.go:103] [control-plane] getting StaticPodSpecs I0625 00:52:23.818583 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "ca-certs" for component "kube-controller-manager" I0625 00:52:23.818592 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "etc-ca-certificates" for component "kube-controller-manager" I0625 00:52:23.818595 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "flexvolume-dir" for component "kube-controller-manager" I0625 00:52:23.818597 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "k8s-certs" for component "kube-controller-manager" I0625 00:52:23.818598 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "kubeconfig" for component "kube-controller-manager" I0625 00:52:23.818600 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "usr-local-share-ca-certificates" for component "kube-controller-manager" I0625 00:52:23.818602 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "usr-share-ca-certificates" for component "kube-controller-manager" I0625 00:52:23.818981 139 manifests.go:158] [control-plane] wrote static Pod manifest for component "kube-controller-manager" to "/etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-controller-manager.yaml" I0625 00:52:23.818989 139 manifests.go:103] [control-plane] getting StaticPodSpecs [control-plane] Creating static Pod manifest for "kube-scheduler" I0625 00:52:23.819110 139 manifests.go:129] [control-plane] adding volume "kubeconfig" for component "kube-scheduler" I0625 00:52:23.819465 139 manifests.go:158] [control-plane] wrote static Pod manifest for component "kube-scheduler" to "/etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-scheduler.yaml" I0625 00:52:23.819554 139 kubelet.go:68] Stopping the kubelet [kubelet-start] Writing kubelet environment file with flags to file "/var/lib/kubelet/kubeadm-flags.env" [kubelet-start] Writing kubelet configuration to file "/var/lib/kubelet/config.yaml" [kubelet-start] Starting the kubelet I0625 00:52:24.210376 139 loader.go:395] Config loaded from file: /etc/kubernetes/admin.conf [wait-control-plane] Waiting for the kubelet to boot up the control plane as static Pods from directory "/etc/kubernetes/manifests" [kubelet-check] Waiting for a healthy kubelet. This can take up to 4m0s [kubelet-check] The kubelet is not healthy after 4m0.001385985s Unfortunately, an error has occurred: The HTTP call equal to 'curl -sSL http://localhost:10248/healthz' returned error: Get "http://localhost:10248/healthz": context deadline exceeded This error is likely caused by: - The kubelet is not running - The kubelet is unhealthy due to a misconfiguration of the node in some way (required cgroups disabled) If you are on a systemd-powered system, you can try to troubleshoot the error with the following commands: - 'systemctl status kubelet' - 'journalctl -xeu kubelet' Additionally, a control plane component may have crashed or exited when started by the container runtime. To troubleshoot, list all containers using your preferred container runtimes CLI. Here is one example how you may list all running Kubernetes containers by using crictl: - 'crictl --runtime-endpoint unix:///run/containerd/containerd.sock ps -a | grep kube | grep -v pause' Once you have found the failing container, you can inspect its logs with: - 'crictl --runtime-endpoint unix:///run/containerd/containerd.sock logs CONTAINERID' couldn't initialize a Kubernetes cluster k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/init.runWaitControlPlanePhase.func1 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/init/waitcontrolplane.go:110 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/init.runWaitControlPlanePhase k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/init/waitcontrolplane.go:115 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow.(*Runner).Run.func1 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow/runner.go:259 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow.(*Runner).visitAll k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow/runner.go:446 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow.(*Runner).Run k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow/runner.go:232 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd.newCmdInit.func1 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/init.go:128 github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute github.com/spf13/[email protected]/command.go:940 github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC github.com/spf13/[email protected]/command.go:1068 github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute github.com/spf13/[email protected]/command.go:992 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app.Run k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/kubeadm.go:52 main.main k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/kubeadm.go:25 runtime.main runtime/proc.go:271 runtime.goexit runtime/asm_amd64.s:1695 error execution phase wait-control-plane k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow.(*Runner).Run.func1 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow/runner.go:260 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow.(*Runner).visitAll k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow/runner.go:446 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow.(*Runner).Run k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/phases/workflow/runner.go:232 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd.newCmdInit.func1 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/cmd/init.go:128 github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute github.com/spf13/[email protected]/command.go:940 github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC github.com/spf13/[email protected]/command.go:1068 github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute github.com/spf13/[email protected]/command.go:992 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app.Run k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/kubeadm.go:52 main.main k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/kubeadm.go:25 runtime.main runtime/proc.go:271 runtime.goexit runtime/asm_amd64.s:1695 make: *** [setup-kind] Error 1

I haven't seen this before, but have a few suggestions:

Ensure Kubernetes is enabled in Docker and Docker has enough resources allocated:

screenshots

_I'm not sure all of these resources are necessary, but this is what mine is configured to. Would be great if we can determine the minimum amount required. I suspect at least ~4 CPU and ~8GB RAM given the resource overrides in config.yaml.

Try adding --verbosity 9 to the setup-kind command, for more detailed log output: kind create cluster --name agship --verbosity 9

Take a look at the Starship Docs for the primary source of truth and see if there's something I might've missed documenting.

LuqiPan · 2024-06-25T01:04:48Z

multichain-testing/test/stake-ica.test.ts

+
+test.before(async t => {
+  const { deleteTestKeys, setupTestKeys, ...rest } = await commonSetup(t);
+  // deleteTestKeys().catch();


question

Is this still needed?

In active development, if a test fails with an uncaught exception, the test.after block will not run and the key will not be deleted. This will cause the next test run to fail.

The only harm in leaving this is some extra unnecessary work in the happy path (attempting to delete keys that aren't there), so it may be best to include this.

I'm not sure the best pattern has been arrived at yet, so suggestions are welcome. It would be nice if we didn't need to rely on the keyring in the container and could use a new DirectSecp256k1HdWallet per run.

I've decided to keep this around, as it's harmless. Included a comment about why it's there.

LuqiPan · 2024-06-25T01:06:51Z

multichain-testing/test/stake-ica.test.ts

+const accounts = ['user1', 'user2'];
+
+test.before(async t => {
+  const { deleteTestKeys, setupTestKeys, ...rest } = await commonSetup(t);


question

Is it me or commonSetup doesn't seem to return deleteTestKeys nor setupTestKeys?

They are part of makeKeyring, which is spread into commonSetup via keyring here

LuqiPan · 2024-06-25T20:14:25Z

multichain-testing/test/stake-ica.test.ts

+  t.log(`${scenario.contractName} makeAccountInvitationMaker offer`);
+  const makeAccountofferId = `makeAccount-${Date.now()}`;
+
+  // FIXME we get payouts but not an offer result; it times out


question

Did you plan to address this in this PR or a separate PR?

This is the main blocker on the PR currently. Ideally, we can square this away here and read offer results from the Notifier / @agoric/casting instead of polling vstorage.

However, since we are still able to read offer results in vstorage, there is an opportunity to fix forward if we wish to land this faster.

Created #9643 so we can tackle this in a separate PR.

0xpatrickdev · 2024-07-02T18:42:30Z

I've updated the description so that this PR closes #8896. It was arguably already closed via #9462, but we now have a nicer setup that incudes 1) a dynamic chain registry, and 2) tests with a real contract.

Reviewers - in addition to code review, please confirm you are able to execute the test suite locally.

turadg

Clear progress. I'm not certain it completes #8896 but I suppose any oustanding work is worth new tickets.

multichain-testing/Makefile

multichain-testing/README.md

turadg · 2024-07-02T21:00:56Z

multichain-testing/package.json

@@ -56,7 +60,8 @@
      "**/*.test.ts"
    ],
    "concurrency": 1,
-    "serial": true
+    "serial": true,
+    "timeout": "125s"


oddly specific :)

😅 the unbonding_period is 2min

turadg · 2024-07-02T21:01:28Z

multichain-testing/scripts/deploy-cli.ts

+import { makeAgdTools } from '../tools/agd-tools.js';
+import { makeDeployBuilder } from '../tools/deploy.js';
+
+async function main() {


I expect we'll DRY later

Agree for .js files in /tools wrt to #8963. This file, I'm surprised to hear this feedback - can you point me to something similar?

Nothing similar but I could see it being a regular CLI command. Though I didn't have any specific ideas in mind other than to ignore my DRY/factoring sniffer.

turadg · 2024-07-02T21:02:47Z

multichain-testing/scripts/install.sh

-      ;;
-    *)
-      ;;
+  -c | --config)


is this formatting the result of https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/blob/master/.prettierrc.json5#L23-L29 ?

Not sure, doesn't happen for me, but I fixed up the diff

Only config.yaml changes to single quotes if we do:

diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index 40bce1032..39be23458 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ "create-agoric-cli": "node ./scripts/create-agoric-cli.cjs", - "format": "yarn prettier --write .github golang packages scripts", + "format": "yarn prettier --write .github golang packages scripts multichain-testing", "lint:format": "yarn prettier --check .github golang packages scripts",

This PR is already in the merge queue, but I think someone can pick up this change the next time they're contributing to this directory

turadg · 2024-07-02T21:05:10Z

multichain-testing/test/tools/wallet.test.ts

@@ -7,37 +7,41 @@ import { commonSetup } from '../support.js';

 const test = anyTest as TestFn<Record<string, never>>;

-test('create a wallet and get tokens', async t => {
+const walletScenario = test.macro(async (t, scenario: string) => {


👍 macros

turadg · 2024-07-02T21:05:48Z

multichain-testing/tools/agd-lib.js

+      ),
+      { stdio: ['ignore', 'pipe', 'ignore'] },
+    );
+    paths.forEach(path => {


for (const path of paths) {

i'm surprised the linter didn't complain

turadg · 2024-07-02T21:07:27Z

multichain-testing/tools/agd-tools.ts

+    execFileSync,
+  }: Pick<typeof import('child_process'), 'execFile' | 'execFileSync'>,
+) => {
+  const bundleCache = makeNodeBundleCache(


I'm partial to,

const bundleCache = unsafeMakeBundleCache('bundles');

though I wonder why we even need any arguments

adding: ``` kubectl logs hermes-agoric-gaia-0 --container=relayer --follow kubectl logs hermes-osmosis-gaia-0 --container=relayer --follow ```

- includes revise-chain-info.builder.js in ci to ensure agoricNames matchs the starship environment

0xpatrickdev · 2024-07-03T21:20:19Z

Here is a transcript of the ava test: https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/actions/runs/9784730113/job/27016269113#step:12:1

Wishes ava logs would appear at the same time as console logs.

0xpatrickdev force-pushed the 9042-stake-atom-e2e-rebased branch from f0c9bb1 to 37f2bd3 Compare June 20, 2024 03:51

turadg mentioned this pull request Jun 21, 2024

test of revising chain info #9552

Merged

LuqiPan reviewed Jun 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

0xpatrickdev force-pushed the 9042-stake-atom-e2e-rebased branch from 37f2bd3 to 3c1654c Compare July 1, 2024 23:23

0xpatrickdev changed the title ~~feat(multichain-testing): dynamic chain registry~~ feat(multichain-testing): stakeIca contract e2e test Jul 1, 2024

0xpatrickdev force-pushed the 9042-stake-atom-e2e-rebased branch from ed73eb0 to 13aec9a Compare July 2, 2024 18:26

0xpatrickdev marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2024 18:39

0xpatrickdev requested review from LuqiPan and turadg July 2, 2024 18:42

turadg approved these changes Jul 2, 2024

View reviewed changes

0xpatrickdev and others added 10 commits July 3, 2024 16:41

feat: stake ica test setup

b6f5956

refactor: distinguish from starship names

8a4ebee

docs: multi-chain setup

0c0e179

test: install-contracts is test setup

9311770

chore: clean up e2e-tools

cb22e56

feat: update agoricNames with starship registry

47711ec

feat: copy plan files to container and runCoreEval

06b225f

test(stake-ica): include contract installation

f8a5575

adding kubectl command for hermes pod logs to README

e7e0830

adding: ``` kubectl logs hermes-agoric-gaia-0 --container=relayer --follow kubectl logs hermes-osmosis-gaia-0 --container=relayer --follow ```

chore: add add-address to makefile

592dbd0

0xpatrickdev force-pushed the 9042-stake-atom-e2e-rebased branch from 13aec9a to fc52aef Compare July 3, 2024 20:47

0xpatrickdev added 3 commits July 3, 2024 16:58

test(ci): include Update Chain Registry

4a4523b

- includes revise-chain-info.builder.js in ci to ensure agoricNames matchs the starship environment

test(stakeIca): withdraw rewards

b3bc19d

chore: yarn.lock outdated

55f1896

0xpatrickdev force-pushed the 9042-stake-atom-e2e-rebased branch from 79ca698 to 55f1896 Compare July 3, 2024 20:58

0xpatrickdev added the automerge:rebase Automatically rebase updates, then merge label Jul 3, 2024

mergify bot merged commit bfa47d1 into master Jul 3, 2024
86 checks passed

mergify bot deleted the 9042-stake-atom-e2e-rebased branch July 3, 2024 21:51

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat(multichain-testing): `stakeIca` contract e2e test #9534

feat(multichain-testing): `stakeIca` contract e2e test #9534

0xpatrickdev commented Jun 19, 2024 •

edited

Loading

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jun 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

LuqiPan left a comment

LuqiPan Jun 25, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jun 26, 2024

LuqiPan Jun 25, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jun 26, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jul 2, 2024

LuqiPan Jun 25, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jun 26, 2024

LuqiPan Jun 25, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jun 26, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jul 2, 2024

0xpatrickdev commented Jul 2, 2024

turadg left a comment

turadg Jul 2, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jul 3, 2024

turadg Jul 2, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jul 3, 2024

turadg Jul 4, 2024

turadg Jul 2, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jul 3, 2024

0xpatrickdev Jul 3, 2024

turadg Jul 2, 2024

turadg Jul 2, 2024

turadg Jul 2, 2024

0xpatrickdev commented Jul 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

feat(multichain-testing): stakeIca contract e2e test #9534

feat(multichain-testing): stakeIca contract e2e test #9534

Conversation

0xpatrickdev commented Jun 19, 2024 • edited Loading

Description

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jun 20, 2024 • edited Loading

Deploying agoric-sdk with Cloudflare Pages

LuqiPan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

0xpatrickdev commented Jul 2, 2024

turadg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

0xpatrickdev commented Jul 3, 2024 • edited Loading

feat(multichain-testing): `stakeIca` contract e2e test #9534

feat(multichain-testing): `stakeIca` contract e2e test #9534

0xpatrickdev commented Jun 19, 2024 •

edited

Loading

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jun 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

0xpatrickdev commented Jul 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading