Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: test-rankOrder works on ava 3 or 4 #6327

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2022

Conversation

erights
Copy link
Member

@erights erights commented Sep 26, 2022

endojs/endo#1260 would move test-rankOrder to the endo repository, which is currently on ava 3, so the test in that PR has been changed to work on ava 3 or 4. The change needed IMO was also a net improvement in code quality, so at least in this case there's no cost. This PR ports that back to test-rankOrder.js in agoric-sdk to minimize the maintenance hazard while this file exists in both places.

See also
endojs/endo#1291
#6296

@erights erights self-assigned this Sep 26, 2022
@erights erights requested a review from gibson042 September 26, 2022 23:33
@erights erights force-pushed the markm-test-rankOrder-works-ava-3or4 branch 2 times, most recently from 2fc05a1 to 19d23d2 Compare September 29, 2022 03:45
Copy link
Member

@gibson042 gibson042 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@erights erights force-pushed the markm-test-rankOrder-works-ava-3or4 branch from 19d23d2 to f268899 Compare September 29, 2022 20:42
@erights erights added the automerge:squash Automatically squash merge label Sep 29, 2022
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 9f75b0e into master Sep 29, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the markm-test-rankOrder-works-ava-3or4 branch September 29, 2022 21:23
turadg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge:squash Automatically squash merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants