-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Niv #5
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Niv #5
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Take a look at my comments on the newman conway sequence. Then review the notes on Fibonacci sequence. You did things in a very inefficient manner. See if you can identify why.
Max subarray was well done.
return 1 | ||
else | ||
num = get_newman_num(get_newman_num(num - 1)) + get_newman_num(num - get_newman_num(num - 1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because you're not saving the subproblems anywhere, you end up solving the problems over and over like Fibonacci sequence. So this is MUCH worse than O(n). I believe this is actually O(3n) since you are making 3 recursive calls at each level.
# Time Complexity: ? | ||
# Space Complexity: ? | ||
# Time Complexity: O(n) | ||
# Space Complexity: O(1) | ||
def max_sub_array(nums) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
No description provided.