-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tools: Move exporter alias handling to CLI #7410
Conversation
Thanks @theotherjimmy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neat
/morph build |
Build : ABORTEDBuild number : 2539 |
/morph build |
Build : SUCCESSBuild number : 2546 Triggering tests/morph test |
Exporter Build : FAILUREBuild number : 2190 |
Test : SUCCESSBuild number : 2301 |
@theotherjimmy It looks like there were CI node issues:
|
@cmonr That's a bug. |
a3e6b89
to
71323af
Compare
/morph build |
Build : SUCCESSBuild number : 2550 Triggering tests/morph test |
Test : SUCCESSBuild number : 2307 |
Exporter Build : FAILUREBuild number : 2195 |
@theotherjimmy You'll need to look at how the export job is configured to reproduce locally. |
Thanks @cmonr I have enough info to take it from here. |
/morph build |
Build : SUCCESSBuild number : 2554 Triggering tests/morph test |
Exporter Build : FAILUREBuild number : 2199 |
Looks like I have to do this the hard way: make the CI not use the aliases. |
@studavekar You'll help will be needed here. |
Test : SUCCESSBuild number : 2311 |
Trying to understand it here. |
@0xc0170 No. |
@0xc0170 What's failing CI is that the CI is attempting to inspect the |
@studavekar Mind taking a look at this? This needs a tweak to the CI config. |
@0xc0170 Changing this back to Needs: CI since no PR work is needed and is still ready to run. |
If I go ahead and make the changes in CI right now, Other PR would fail which are in the queue. |
@studavekar Sure, if that's needed. We're changing from one valid exporter to another, so I did not think that would change much. |
The exporter queue was empty so it fine to do. |
Exporter Build : SUCCESSBuild number : 2202 |
@cmonr can you merge this PR. other PR exporter build would fail if this change is not in.. |
@studavekar As I have said multiple times in this thread, that's not true. This does not change anything about what |
@theotherjimmyI felt that this would break exporter because the last exporter result #7410 (comment)
We have updated the CI to use |
@studavekar That's part of the changes in this PR. I did not add |
…liases Tools: Move exporter alias handling to CLI
Description
Both the online compiler and the offline tools use the same code for
exporting and compilation. This is great, as it significantly reduces
code duplication and maintenance efforts. A knock-on effect of this
is that the exporters available on the command line are all available
online. Including the aliases.
This PR removes the aliases from the online compiler.
@thegecko as promised.
Pull request type