Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STM32 : new DISCO_WB5MMG target #14578

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of changes

I would like to introduce the new Discovery kit based on STM32WB5MMG:

  • 1-Mbyte Flash memory
  • 256-Kbyte SRAM
  • in Module RF package
  • Dual-core 32‑bit (Cortex-M4 and dedicated M0+ CPU for real-time radio layer)

https://www.st.com/en/evaluation-tools/stm32wb5mm-dk.html

  • All tests are OK for GCC and ARM
  • CI test shield OK
  • CL1 and CL2 tested.

For information, some other steps will follow in other PR:

  • QSPI support
  • STMOD+ connector addition and test

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Apr 22, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team April 22, 2021 09:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@jeromecoutant, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@0xc0170 thx to review this one

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels May 3, 2021
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented May 3, 2021

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented May 3, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ❌ FAILED

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test

@mergify mergify bot added needs: work and removed needs: CI labels May 3, 2021
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented May 3, 2021

CI restarted

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented May 3, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 2 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@mbedmain mbedmain removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels May 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants