FRDM-K64F: incorrect entry in PinMap_UART_RX

[pythontech]

The code has PTC6 as an option for UART_0 RX, but it should be PTD6. This can be verified from section 10.3.1 "K64 Signal Multiplexing and Pin Assignments" in the K64 Sub-Family Reference Manual

diff --git a/libraries/mbed/targets/hal/TARGET_Freescale/TARGET_KPSDK_MCUS/TARGET_MCU_K64F/TARGET_FRDM/PeripheralPins.c b/libraries/mbed/targets/hal/TARGET_Freescale/TARGET_KPSDK_MCUS/TARGET_MCU_K64F/TARGET_FRDM/PeripheralPins.c
index f9a4db1..92009d7 100644
--- a/libraries/mbed/targets/hal/TARGET_Freescale/TARGET_KPSDK_MCUS/TARGET_MCU_K64F/TARGET_FRDM/PeripheralPins.c
+++ b/libraries/mbed/targets/hal/TARGET_Freescale/TARGET_KPSDK_MCUS/TARGET_MCU_K64F/TARGET_FRDM/PeripheralPins.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ const PinMap PinMap_UART_RX[] = {
     {PTC3 , UART_1, 3},
     {PTC14, UART_4, 3},
     {PTD2 , UART_2, 3},
-    {PTC6 , UART_0, 3},
+    {PTD6 , UART_0, 3},
     {NC  ,  NC    , 0}
 };

[0xc0170]

Thanks for reporting. Please send a pull request with this change. I checked, PTC6 does not have UART mux option available, PTD6 does.

[pythontech]

PR submitted: #1675

[ciarmcom]

ARM Internal Ref: IOTMORF-207

[sg-]

@pythontech Looks like the fix has been merged