Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ark-cli: Refactor to depend on crates from ark-rust not arklib #15

Closed
kirillt opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #24
Closed

ark-cli: Refactor to depend on crates from ark-rust not arklib #15

kirillt opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #24
Assignees

Comments

@kirillt
Copy link
Member

kirillt commented Mar 12, 2024

We've just moved ark-cli from separate repo into to the crate in this repo:

At the moment, it still depends on arklib which is previous version of ark-rust. Before we could archive the arklib repo, we need to sort out dependencies and point ark-cli to individual crates.

Also, just cli should be better name since all crates belong to ark family. The binary should be named ark-cli though.

@tareknaser tareknaser self-assigned this Mar 12, 2024
@kirillt kirillt changed the title Refactor ark-cli to depend on crates from ark-rust not arklib fs-cli: Refactor to depend on crates from ark-rust not arklib Apr 3, 2024
@kirillt kirillt changed the title fs-cli: Refactor to depend on crates from ark-rust not arklib ark-cli: Refactor to depend on crates from ark-rust not arklib Apr 3, 2024
tareknaser pushed a commit to tareknaser/ark-rust that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2024
tareknaser added a commit to tareknaser/ark-rust that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2024
The branch `ark-rust_hot_fix` contains a hot fix where we use the same commit specified when writing `ark-cli` but with pinning `image` crate to the correct version so that `ark-rust` can compile

This is just a hot fix. `arklib` shouldn't be even a dependency of any `ark-rust` crate. See ARK-Builders#15 for more information

Signed-off-by: Tarek <[email protected]>
tareknaser added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2024
The branch `ark-rust_hot_fix` contains a hot fix where we use the same commit specified when writing `ark-cli` but with pinning `image` crate to the correct version so that `ark-rust` can compile

This is just a hot fix. `arklib` shouldn't be even a dependency of any `ark-rust` crate. See #15 for more information

Signed-off-by: Tarek <[email protected]>
tareknaser pushed a commit to tareknaser/ark-rust that referenced this issue Apr 9, 2024
kirillt pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2024
The branch `ark-rust_hot_fix` contains a hot fix where we use the same commit specified when writing `ark-cli` but with pinning `image` crate to the correct version so that `ark-rust` can compile

This is just a hot fix. `arklib` shouldn't be even a dependency of any `ark-rust` crate. See #15 for more information

Signed-off-by: Tarek <[email protected]>
kirillt pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2024
The branch `ark-rust_hot_fix` contains a hot fix where we use the same commit specified when writing `ark-cli` but with pinning `image` crate to the correct version so that `ark-rust` can compile

This is just a hot fix. `arklib` shouldn't be even a dependency of any `ark-rust` crate. See #15 for more information

Signed-off-by: Tarek <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants