Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 10, 2023. It is now read-only.

(Fix) Basic mobile responsiveness #532

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Feb 6, 2020

Conversation

gabitoesmiapodo
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #279

Not sure if I addressed every issue there is, but I fixed quite a few. There are still parts of the app I don't know they exist, so I may have missed something.

Tried to make things at least fit in a 375px wide screen, maybe even less. Most things should look OK now, but there are a few components that couldn't be adapted easily to something nicer.

Tables should be horizontally scrollable now, but tables' footers don't seem to adapt to the table's width. It looks like this is the intended behavior.

I think that at the bare minimum users should be able to use the app on mobile devices now.

Some screenshots:

Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 17 06 49
Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 17 07 01
Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 17 07 08
Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 17 07 31
Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 17 07 49
Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 17 07 41
Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 17 11 59
Screen Shot 2020-02-05 at 17 13 10

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 5, 2020

Travis automatic deployment:
https://pr532--safereact.review.gnosisdev.com

Copy link
Member

@lukasschor lukasschor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 6, 2020

Travis automatic deployment:
https://pr532--safereact.review.gnosisdev.com

1 similar comment
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 6, 2020

Travis automatic deployment:
https://pr532--safereact.review.gnosisdev.com

@gabitoesmiapodo gabitoesmiapodo merged commit 165a088 into development Feb 6, 2020
@gabitoesmiapodo gabitoesmiapodo deleted the fix/#279-basic-mobile-responsiveness branch February 6, 2020 15:40
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants