-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 363
Tech Debt: Validator Type definitions #1108
Conversation
…ator-type-definitions
Travis automatic deployment: |
Travis automatic deployment: |
Travis automatic deployment: |
@francovenica Could you please test sending funds/contract interaction forms for this PR? Especially with the edge cases (balance less than token, balance equal to token balance, etc). Thanks! |
Travis automatic deployment: |
Travis automatic deployment: |
Travis automatic deployment: |
ESLint Summary View Full Report
[warning] @typescript-eslint/explicit-module-boundary-types
Report generated by eslint-plus-action |
Travis automatic deployment: |
@francovenica could you please test this? |
Travis automatic deployment: |
src/routes/safe/components/Balances/Tokens/screens/AddCustomToken/validators.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I don't know why it marked those as 'request change' despite I expressly clicked the 'comment' button 🤷♂️ |
Travis automatic deployment: |
Travis automatic deployment: |
1 similar comment
Travis automatic deployment: |
…ator-type-definitions
Travis automatic deployment: |
…ator-type-definitions
I tested this PR and it worked fine: validation works as expected in forms and different scenarios like no token selected, re-validating after changing token etc |
Travis automatic deployment: |
This PR:
simpleMemoize
function withmemoize
from lodash to fix typings