fix: Fix problem with timeout for python 311 tests

[Czaki]

No description provided.

[deprecated-napari-hub-preview-bot]

Preview page for your plugin is ready here:
https://preview.napari-hub.org/4DNucleome/PartSeg/869
Updated: 2023-08-01T12:34:22.115631

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.03%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	7.72 ⭐	7.70 ⭐	-0.02 👍
Method Length	79.62 🙂	79.81 🙂	0.19 👎
Working memory	9.33 🙂	9.32 🙂	-0.01 👍
Quality	62.74% 🙂	62.77% 🙂	0.03% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	815	817	2

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
package/PartSegCore/analysis/batch_processing/batch_backend.py	62.74% 🙂	62.77% 🙂	0.03% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
package/PartSegCore/analysis/batch_processing/batch_backend.py	FileData.add_data_part	26 😞	301 ⛔	21 ⛔	18.56% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
package/PartSegCore/analysis/batch_processing/batch_backend.py	CalculationProcess.do_calculation	25 😞	321 ⛔	13 😞	26.21% 😞	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
package/PartSegCore/analysis/batch_processing/batch_backend.py	CalculationManager.get_results	14 🙂	174 😞	16 ⛔	38.34% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
package/PartSegCore/analysis/batch_processing/batch_backend.py	FileData.wrote_data_to_file	17 🙂	155 😞	12 😞	43.10% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
package/PartSegCore/analysis/batch_processing/batch_backend.py	FileData.write_to_excel	9 🙂	164 😞	11 😞	50.82% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 95.65% and project coverage change: +0.04% 🎉

Comparison is base (1fb01af) 92.03% compared to head (3a4d8c9) 92.08%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #869      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    92.03%   92.08%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          203      203              
  Lines        31530    31582      +52     
===========================================
+ Hits         29020    29082      +62     
+ Misses        2510     2500      -10     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_sentry.py	97.81% <78.57%> (-2.19%)	⬇️
package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_argparser.py	98.63% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
...SegCore/analysis/batch_processing/batch_backend.py	90.39% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
...kage/PartSegCore/napari_plugins/save_tiff_layer.py	97.22% <100.00%> (+49.07%)	⬆️
...kage/tests/test_PartSegCore/test_napari_plugins.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication