fix: Fix pre release tests #1219
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request addresses issues #1211 and #1217 by modifying the pre-release test workflow. The changes include splitting the test execution, updating the dependency management tool, and adjusting the installation process. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @Czaki - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt (1)
1-2: Consider adding comments for better documentation.To improve maintainability, it would be helpful to add comments explaining why these specific versions are excluded. This context can be valuable for future developers working on the project.
Example:
+# Exclude due to [specific issue or incompatibility] mpmath!=1.4.0a0 +# Exclude due to [specific issue or incompatibility] ipykernel!=7.0.0a0.github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (2)
77-90: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The new "Test with tox base" step is well-structured and aligns with the workflow's purpose. It correctly uses the headless GUI action and sets appropriate environment variables for pre-release testing.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this specific test step, especially how it differs from the "Test with tox linux" step. This would improve maintainability. For example:
- name: Test with tox base # Run core and image tests with pre-release dependencies uses: aganders3/headless-gui@v2 ...
132-132: LGTM! Consider documenting the switch touv.The change from
pip-toolstouvis a good optimization.uvis known for its performance improvements in dependency management.Consider adding a comment explaining the switch to
uvfor future reference. For example:- name: Install dependencies run: | pip install --upgrade pip pip install uv # Using uv for faster dependency resolution and installation - name: Compile and install PyInstaller requirements run: | # Using uv for faster compilation and syncing of requirements uv pip compile --upgrade -o requirements.txt pyproject.toml requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt --extra pyinstaller --prerelease allow uv pip sync requirements.txt uv pip install .This documentation will help future maintainers understand the rationale behind using
uv.Also applies to: 135-137
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (2 hunks)
- requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
requirements/pre_test_problematic_version.txt (1)
2-2: LGTM: New exclusion added correctly.The addition of
ipykernel!=7.0.0a0is consistent with the existing exclusion format and aligns with the file's purpose of specifying problematic versions for pre-release testing..github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-170: Overall, the changes improve the workflow's efficiency and test coverage.The modifications to this workflow enhance its capabilities in several ways:
- The addition of the "Test with tox base" step provides more comprehensive testing.
- The use of
uvin the pyinstaller job potentially improves dependency management performance.- The workflow maintains its focus on pre-release testing, which aligns with the PR objectives.
These changes should help in identifying issues earlier in the development process, particularly for pre-release versions. To further improve the workflow, consider adding comments to explain the rationale behind the test split and the switch to
uv, as suggested in the previous comments.
96-96: Please clarify the rationale for splitting the tests.The test command has been changed to only run
package/tests/test_PartSeg. While this avoids duplication with the new "Test with tox base" step, it's not immediately clear why this specific test is run separately.Could you provide more context on why
test_PartSegis tested in isolation? This information would be valuable for future maintenance.To help verify the test coverage, you can run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Test splitting rationale confirmed.
The
test_PartSegdirectory contains numerous tests, supporting the decision to run it separately for an optimized and organized testing pipeline.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the content of test files to understand the test split # List the content of the test directories echo "Content of package/tests/test_PartSegImage:" fd . package/tests/test_PartSegImage -t f -x echo {} echo "\nContent of package/tests/test_PartSegCore:" fd . package/tests/test_PartSegCore -t f -x echo {} echo "\nContent of package/tests/test_PartSeg:" fd . package/tests/test_PartSeg -t f -x echo {}Length of output: 3620
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (1)
77-90: LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new test step.The addition of this new test step using tox is a good improvement to the workflow. It enhances test coverage by specifically targeting
test_PartSegImageandtest_PartSegCorepackages.Consider adding a brief comment above this step to explain its purpose and how it differs from the existing "Test with tox linux" step. This will help future maintainers understand the workflow structure more easily.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-170: Overall, these changes significantly improve the pre-release testing workflow.The modifications in this file align well with the PR objectives of fixing pre-release tests. Key improvements include:
- Addition of a new, more specific test step using tox.
- Refinement of existing test steps to reduce potential redundancy.
- Upgrade to uv for more efficient dependency management.
These changes should lead to more robust and efficient pre-release testing, helping to catch issues earlier in the development process.
132-132: LGTM! Update documentation to reflect the switch to uv.The change from pip-tools to uv for dependency management is a good improvement. uv is known for its speed and efficiency in handling Python dependencies.
Consider updating any relevant documentation or README files to reflect this change in dependency management. This will help other contributors understand the new workflow.
To ensure the switch to uv doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script:
This script will verify that uv is installed correctly and can compile requirements without issues.
Also applies to: 135-137
| - name: Test with tox linux | ||
| # run tests using pip install --pre | ||
| uses: aganders3/headless-gui@v2 | ||
| timeout-minutes: 60 | ||
| with: | ||
| run: python -m tox run -v -- -v | ||
| run: python -m tox run -v -- -v package/tests/test_PartSeg |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete Test Coverage: 'package/tests/' not included in tox commands.
The current tox commands do not include the package/tests/ directory, which may result in missing tests located directly under it.
- Action Required: Update the tox commands to include
package/tests/to ensure all tests are executed.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify complete test coverage across both tox steps.
The modification to run tests only for package/tests/test_PartSeg in this step is good, as it complements the new "Test with tox base" step.
To ensure we haven't inadvertently missed any tests, please run the following script to verify complete test coverage:
Compare the output to ensure all necessary test directories are included in the tox commands.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all test directories are covered by the tox commands
# Test: Check if all test directories are included in either tox command
echo "Test directories in tox commands:"
grep -E "python -m tox run.*package/tests" .github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml
echo -e "\nAll test directories in the project:"
fd -t d "test" package
Length of output: 554
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1219 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 93.13% 93.14% +0.01%
===========================================
Files 210 210
Lines 33172 33172
===========================================
+ Hits 30894 30899 +5
+ Misses 2278 2273 -5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (1)
81-94: LGTM: New tox test step added.The addition of this new test step is beneficial as it provides more granular testing for specific packages. The use of the
aganders3/headless-gui@v2action is appropriate for GUI testing, and the environment variables are well-configured for the project's needs.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of testing these specific packages separately, to improve maintainability for future contributors.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (4)
21-23: LGTM: Concurrency configuration added.The addition of the concurrency configuration is a good practice. It helps manage CI resources by canceling in-progress jobs when a new run is triggered, while ensuring separate concurrency groups for different branches or PRs.
131-131: Consider keeping Python version consistent.The change from a fixed Python version (3.12) to a more flexible version (3.x) introduces potential inconsistencies across different runs. This might lead to difficulties in reproducing issues or ensuring consistent behavior.
Could you please clarify the rationale behind this change? If there's no specific reason, consider keeping it consistent with the Python version used in other jobs (3.12) to ensure reproducibility.
100-100: LGTM: Test scope refined.The modification to run tests only for
package/tests/test_PartSegin this step is good, as it complements the new "Test with tox base" step.To ensure we haven't inadvertently missed any tests, please run the following script to verify complete test coverage:
Compare the output to ensure all necessary test directories are included in the tox commands.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Complete test coverage verified.
All test directories are included in the tox commands, ensuring comprehensive test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all test directories are covered by the tox commands # Test: Check if all test directories are included in either tox command echo "Test directories in tox commands:" grep -E "python -m tox run.*package/tests" .github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml echo -e "\nAll test directories in the project:" fd -t d "test" packageLength of output: 554
133-142: LGTM: Upgraded dependency management to uv.The switch from pip-tools to uv is a positive change. uv is known for better performance and dependency resolution, which could help address pre-release test issues.
Consider updating the project's documentation to reflect this change in dependency management. This will help other contributors understand the new workflow.
To ensure the uv commands are working as expected, please run the following script:
Review the output to confirm that all uv commands are correctly formatted and that the uv installation step is present.
Also applies to: 149-149
✅ Verification successful
Verified: UV commands are correctly implemented in the workflow.
All uv commands and the uv installation step are properly configured.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify uv commands in the workflow # Test: Check if uv commands are correctly formatted echo "uv commands in the workflow:" grep -E "uv (pip|run|venv|sync)" .github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml echo -e "\nVerify uv installation command:" grep -E "pip install uv" .github/workflows/test_prereleases.ymlLength of output: 634
|
closes #1211
closes #1217
Summary by Sourcery
Fix the pre-release test workflow by adding a new test job and updating existing jobs to ensure tests run with the correct package constraints and environments.
Bug Fixes:
CI:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
toxfor pre-release dependencies.Bug Fixes
ipykernelpackage to prevent installation issues.