chore: Add missed code from #1191 #1197
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request implements changes to the File-Level Changes
Tips
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @Czaki - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider the implications of passing
default_colorsas a parameter. If the same object is reused across multiple calls, it could lead to unexpected behavior. Consider creating a newcycleobject within the function to ensure consistent behavior across calls.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
| def test_name_to_rgb(): | ||
| assert _name_to_rgb("red") == (255, 0, 0) | ||
| assert _name_to_rgb("blue") == (0, 0, 255) | ||
| assert _name_to_rgb("green") == (0, 255, 0) | ||
| with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Unknown color name"): | ||
| _name_to_rgb("strange") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (testing): New test added for _name_to_rgb function
The test covers basic color conversions and an error case. Consider adding more edge cases or boundary conditions to ensure comprehensive coverage.
def test_name_to_rgb():
assert _name_to_rgb("red") == (255, 0, 0)
assert _name_to_rgb("blue") == (0, 0, 255)
assert _name_to_rgb("green") == (0, 255, 0)
assert _name_to_rgb("white") == (255, 255, 255)
assert _name_to_rgb("black") == (0, 0, 0)
assert _name_to_rgb("yellow") == (255, 255, 0)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Unknown color name"):
_name_to_rgb("strange")
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Unknown color name"):
_name_to_rgb("")
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
package/tests/test_PartSegImage/test_image.py (1)
710-715: LGTM! Consider adding more test cases.The
test_name_to_rgbfunction covers the basic functionality of the_name_to_rgbfunction. It's good that you're testing common colors and the error case.To improve the test coverage, consider adding the following:
- Test case-insensitivity (e.g., "RED", "Blue").
- Test for more color names (e.g., "yellow", "cyan", "magenta").
- Test for color names with spaces (e.g., "dark green", "light blue").
- Test for edge cases like empty string or non-string input.
Here's an example of how you could expand the test:
def test_name_to_rgb(): assert _name_to_rgb("red") == (255, 0, 0) assert _name_to_rgb("blue") == (0, 0, 255) assert _name_to_rgb("green") == (0, 255, 0) assert _name_to_rgb("YELLOW") == (255, 255, 0) # Test case-insensitivity assert _name_to_rgb("Cyan") == (0, 255, 255) # Test more colors assert _name_to_rgb("magenta") == (255, 0, 255) assert _name_to_rgb("dark green") == (0, 100, 0) # Test color with space with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Unknown color name"): _name_to_rgb("strange") with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Invalid color name"): _name_to_rgb("") # Test empty string with pytest.raises(TypeError, match="Color name must be a string"): _name_to_rgb(123) # Test non-string inputThis expanded test suite will provide more comprehensive coverage of the
_name_to_rgbfunction.package/PartSegImage/image.py (1)
Line range hint
257-288: Improved implementation with list comprehensions and color cyclingThe refactoring of the
_adjust_channel_infomethod is well done. The use of list comprehensions and thecyclefunction from itertools improves code readability and efficiency. The logic for handling missing channel information is preserved while being more concise.Consider adding a type hint for the
default_colorsparameter in the method signature to improve code clarity:def _adjust_channel_info( channel_info: list[ChannelInfo | ChannelInfoFull] | None, channel_array: list[np.ndarray], default_colors: tuple[str, ...] = ("red", "blue", "green", "yellow", "magenta", "cyan"), ) -> list[ChannelInfoFull]:
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- package/PartSegImage/image.py (2 hunks)
- package/tests/test_PartSegImage/test_image.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
package/tests/test_PartSegImage/test_image.py (1)
708-715: Summary: Good addition of color name to RGB conversion functionality.The changes in this file introduce a new
_name_to_rgbfunction and its corresponding test. This addition complements the existing_hex_to_rgbfunction, providing more flexibility in color handling for the PartSegImage module. The implementation seems sound, although not visible in the diff.A few points to consider:
- Ensure that the
_name_to_rgbfunction is well-documented with docstrings.- Consider expanding the test cases as suggested earlier to improve coverage.
- If this function is intended for public use, consider adding it to the module's public API and documenting it accordingly.
Overall, this is a valuable addition to the color handling capabilities of the module.
package/PartSegImage/image.py (2)
253-255: Method signature updated with default colors parameterThe
_adjust_channel_infomethod now includes adefault_colorsparameter with a default value of common color names. This change enhances the flexibility of the method by allowing customization of default colors.
Line range hint
253-288: Summary: Improved channel info adjustment with flexible color handlingThe changes to the
_adjust_channel_infomethod enhance the Image class's functionality by:
- Adding a customizable
default_colorsparameter.- Implementing color cycling for consistent color assignment.
- Refactoring the code to use list comprehensions for improved readability and efficiency.
These modifications make the method more flexible and maintainable without introducing any apparent issues. The changes align well with the existing codebase and improve the overall quality of the Image class.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1197 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 93.12% 93.14% +0.02%
===========================================
Files 210 210
Lines 33105 33121 +16
===========================================
+ Hits 30828 30850 +22
+ Misses 2277 2271 -6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Czaki
changed the title
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
package/tests/test_PartSegImage/test_image.py (1)
710-723: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage for _name_to_rgb functionThe new test function provides good coverage for the
_name_to_rgbfunction, including:
- Basic color conversions
- Case insensitivity
- Error handling for unknown colors and empty strings
Consider adding a test for a color with non-zero values for all RGB components, such as:
assert _name_to_rgb("purple") == (128, 0, 128)This would ensure that the function correctly handles colors with mixed RGB values.
package/PartSegImage/image.py (2)
Line range hint
253-288: LGTM! Improved readability and efficiency.The changes to the
_adjust_channel_infomethod are well-implemented. The use of list comprehensions and thecyclefunction fromitertoolsmakes the code more concise and efficient. The addition of thedefault_colorsparameter allows for greater flexibility.Consider adding type hints for the
default_colorsparameter:def _adjust_channel_info( channel_info: list[ChannelInfo | ChannelInfoFull] | None, channel_array: list[np.ndarray], - default_colors=("red", "blue", "green", "yellow", "magenta", "cyan"), + default_colors: tuple[str, ...] = ("red", "blue", "green", "yellow", "magenta", "cyan"), ) -> list[ChannelInfoFull]:
997-1012: LGTM! Improved color definition handling.The changes to the color definition handling are well-implemented:
- Attempting to import
get_color_dictfromvispy.colorallows for a more comprehensive color set.- The fallback to a hardcoded dictionary ensures the code works even without
vispyinstalled.- This approach provides a good balance between enhanced functionality and manageable dependencies.
Consider adding a warning when falling back to the hardcoded color dictionary:
try: from vispy.color import get_color_dict except ImportError: # pragma: no cover + import warnings + warnings.warn("vispy not installed, falling back to limited color set", ImportWarning) _NAMED_COLORS = { "red": "#FF0000", "green": "#008000", "blue": "#0000FF", "yellow": "#FFFF00", "cyan": "#00FFFF", "magenta": "#FF00FF", "white": "#FFFFFF", "black": "#000000", "orange": "#FFA500", } else: _NAMED_COLORS = get_color_dict()This warning would inform users that they're using a limited color set and could consider installing
vispyfor more options.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- package/PartSegImage/image.py (3 hunks)
- package/tests/test_PartSegImage/test_image.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
package/tests/test_PartSegImage/test_image.py (1)
708-709: LGTM: Improved code readabilityThe addition of empty lines helps to separate different test functions, enhancing the overall readability of the code.
package/PartSegImage/image.py (1)
991-995: LGTM! Improved robustness.The changes to the
_name_to_rgbfunction enhance its functionality:
- Converting the input to lowercase ensures case-insensitive color name matching.
- The updated error message provides more clarity when an unknown color name is encountered.
These modifications make the function more user-friendly and less prone to errors.
|
To fast click to merge and do not spot that one change was not pushed.
Summary by Sourcery
Refactor the _adjust_channel_info method for better readability and efficiency, and add a new test for the _name_to_rgb function to ensure it handles known and unknown color names correctly.
Enhancements:
Tests:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests