ci: [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #1068
Conversation
![pre-commit-ci[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/68672?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
updates: - [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.1.14 → v0.2.0](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.1.14...v0.2.0)
WalkthroughThe recent updates across various files in the PartSeg project focus on improving code robustness and readability. Key changes include adopting safer data access methods by utilizing the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pyproject.tomlis excluded by:!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (8)
- .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
- package/PartSeg/_roi_mask/main_window.py (1 hunks)
- package/PartSeg/common_gui/algorithms_description.py (1 hunks)
- package/PartSegCore/analysis/load_functions.py (1 hunks)
- package/PartSegCore/analysis/save_functions.py (1 hunks)
- package/PartSegCore/mask/io_functions.py (1 hunks)
- package/PartSegCore/project_info.py (1 hunks)
- package/PartSegCore/utils.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 11
package/PartSegCore/project_info.py (1)
- 75-75: Change promotes safer dictionary access by using
.get(). Good practice.package/PartSegCore/analysis/save_functions.py (1)
- 125-132: Change from
np.string_tonp.bytes_promotes data type consistency and is appropriate for HDF5 file attributes. Good update.package/PartSegCore/analysis/load_functions.py (1)
- 103-103: Change promotes safer dictionary access by using
.get(). Good practice.package/PartSegCore/utils.py (1)
- 172-172: Change promotes safer dictionary access by using
.get()forold_valueassignment. Good practice.package/PartSegCore/mask/io_functions.py (1)
- 296-300: Using
.get()for dictionary access is a good practice for handling missing keys gracefully. However, consider providing default values where appropriate to ensure the code behaves as expected even when keys are missing.package/PartSeg/common_gui/algorithms_description.py (1)
- 575-575: Initializing
start_dictwithself.starting_values.get(name, {})is a good practice for handling missing or undefined starting values. This ensures thatstart_dictis always a dictionary, which prevents potentialTypeErrorwhen attempting to access or modify it later in the code.package/PartSeg/_roi_mask/main_window.py (5)
- 100-100: The use of
seg.get("mask")instead of direct dictionary access withseg["mask"]is a good practice for safer dictionary access, reducing the risk ofKeyErrorexceptions if the key does not exist.- 97-103: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
Ensure all external imports are used within the file to avoid unnecessary dependencies that can increase load time and memory usage.
- 97-103: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [17-17]
Verify that all Qt signal connections are properly disconnected in destructors or appropriate cleanup methods to prevent memory leaks.
- 97-103: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
Review the use of global variables (e.g.,
CONFIG_FOLDER) to ensure they are necessary and appropriately scoped.
- 97-103: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
Check for consistent naming conventions and adherence to PEP 8 for readability and maintainability.
| @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ def prev_mask(self): | |||
| history.roi_extraction_parameters["selected"], | |||
| history.roi_extraction_parameters["parameters"], | |||
| ) | |||
| self.settings.mask = seg["mask"] if "mask" in seg else None | |||
| self.settings.mask = seg.get("mask") | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding error handling for the case where seg does not contain the expected structure or types, to improve robustness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The dict.get returns None if the key is absent, so error handling is not needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Czaki: Acknowledged. Your approach with dict.get effectively handles the scenario where the key might be absent by returning None. This indeed simplifies the need for additional error handling in this context. Thank you for the clarification.
updates:
Summary by CodeRabbit
getmethod for dictionary access across several modules. This enhances error handling and code readability.