Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

leap: Bump pangeo notebook version #2733

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jbusecke
Copy link
Contributor

@jbusecke jbusecke commented Jun 28, 2023

Unsure if I bumped the version in all the right places. Particularly I am not sure what the tag here does.

@jbusecke jbusecke requested a review from a team as a code owner June 28, 2023 13:16
@github-actions
Copy link

Merging this PR will trigger the following deployment actions.

Support and Staging deployments

Cloud Provider Cluster Name Upgrade Support? Reason for Support Redeploy Upgrade Staging? Reason for Staging Redeploy
gcp leap No Yes Following helm chart values files were modified: common.values.yaml

Production deployments

Cloud Provider Cluster Name Hub Name Reason for Redeploy
gcp leap prod Following helm chart values files were modified: common.values.yaml

@consideRatio consideRatio changed the title Bump pangeo notebook version leap: Bump pangeo notebook version Jun 28, 2023
@consideRatio consideRatio merged commit 6d00420 into 2i2c-org:master Jun 28, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉🎉🎉🎉

Monitor the deployment of the hubs here 👉 https://github.com/2i2c-org/infrastructure/actions/runs/5403107197

@consideRatio
Copy link
Contributor

Unsure if I bumped the version in all the right places. Particularly I am not sure what the tag here does.

I'm not 100% confident myself, but when automated tests are running - I think that image will be used to verify that a server can startup properly.

@jbusecke
Copy link
Contributor Author

Saw some errors in the deployment. Is that a concern?

@jbusecke
Copy link
Contributor Author

FWIW our hub shows some display errors, e.g. in the tabs of the dask-extension
image

Not sure this is related, but wanted to document.

@consideRatio
Copy link
Contributor

The staging hub deployed but the test-startup of a user server failed. It can happen if a new node had to start and image was slow to pull or similar. I tested myself and it works, so I'm deploying to the production hub now manually.

What you observe in the jupyterlab extension for dask is perhaps related to upgrading the images and the software in them. I'd guess either jupyterlab or the labextension was upgraded and there was a regression in the UI that probably relates to both codebases.

@consideRatio
Copy link
Contributor

@jbusecke successfull deploy to prod, and i could start a server etc using the latest image bump!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants