Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update all non-major dependencies #68

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 30, 2024
Merged

Update all non-major dependencies #68

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence Type Update
@oclif/core 3.26.0 -> 3.26.5 age adoption passing confidence dependencies patch
@swc/core (source) 1.4.12 -> 1.4.17 age adoption passing confidence devDependencies patch
@types/node (source) 20.12.5 -> 20.12.7 age adoption passing confidence devDependencies patch
@vitest/coverage-v8 (source) 1.4.0 -> 1.5.3 age adoption passing confidence devDependencies minor
eslint-plugin-vitest 0.4.1 -> 0.5.4 age adoption passing confidence devDependencies minor
node (source) 20.12.1 -> 20.12.2 age adoption passing confidence volta patch
npm (source) 10.5.1 -> 10.6.0 age adoption passing confidence packageManager minor
npm (source) 10.5.1 -> 10.6.0 age adoption passing confidence volta minor
tough-cookie 4.1.3 -> 4.1.4 age adoption passing confidence dependencies patch
typescript (source) 5.4.4 -> 5.4.5 age adoption passing confidence devDependencies patch
vitest (source) 1.4.0 -> 1.5.3 age adoption passing confidence devDependencies minor
zod (source) 3.22.4 -> 3.23.5 age adoption passing confidence dependencies minor

Release Notes

oclif/core (@​oclif/core)

v3.26.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v3.26.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v3.26.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: bump ejs from 3.1.9 to 3.1.10 (72dd869)

v3.26.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • do not throw an error if a flag with allowStdin='only' is immediately followed by another flag (#​1046) (#​1047) (f05b0c8)

v3.26.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
swc-project/swc (@​swc/core)

v1.4.17

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v1.4.16

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v1.4.15

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Features
Refactor
Build

v1.4.14

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Documentation
  • (swc_core) Resolve build issue with --all-features flag (#​8848) (c0d901e)
Refactor
Testing

v1.4.13

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
vitest-dev/vitest (@​vitest/coverage-v8)

v1.5.3

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v1.5.2

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v1.5.1

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v1.5.0

Compare Source

veritem/eslint-plugin-vitest (eslint-plugin-vitest)

v0.5.4

Compare Source

Features
  • support old Eslint configuration
  • update dependencies

v0.5.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v0.5.2

Compare Source

Features

v0.5.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-focused-tests: support .each template strings (#​420) (36e5b9a)

v0.5.0

Compare Source

‼️ Breaking Change 🚨

This version only supports flat config!

If you run into issues consider downgrading and opening an issue ofcourse.

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v0.5.0...v0.5.0

nodejs/node (node)

v20.12.2: 2024-04-10, Version 20.12.2 'Iron' (LTS), @​RafaelGSS

Compare Source

This is a security release.

Notable Changes
  • CVE-2024-27980 - Command injection via args parameter of child_process.spawn without shell option enabled on Windows
Commits
npm/cli (npm)

v10.6.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Dependencies
Chores

v10.5.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Documentation
Dependencies
Chores
salesforce/tough-cookie (tough-cookie)

v4.1.4

Compare Source

Microsoft/TypeScript (typescript)

v5.4.5: TypeScript 5.4.5

Compare Source

For release notes, check out the release announcement.

For the complete list of fixed issues, check out the

Downloads are available on:

colinhacks/zod (zod)

v3.23.5

Compare Source

v3.23.4

Compare Source

Commits:

v3.23.3

Compare Source

v3.23.2

Compare Source

Commits:

v3.23.1

Compare Source

v3.23.0

Compare Source

Zod 3.23 is now available. This is the final 3.x release before Zod 4.0. To try it out:

npm install zod

Features

z.string().date()

Zod can now validate ISO 8601 date strings. Thanks @​igalklebanov! https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/1766

const schema = z.string().date();
schema.parse("2022-01-01"); // OK
z.string().time()

Zod can now validate ISO 8601 time strings. Thanks @​igalklebanov! https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/1766

const schema = z.string().time();
schema.parse("12:00:00"); // OK

You can specify sub-second precision using the precision option:

const schema = z.string().time({ precision: 3 });
schema.parse("12:00:00.123"); // OK
schema.parse("12:00:00.123456"); // Error
schema.parse("12:00:00"); // Error
z.string().duration()

Zod can now validate ISO 8601 duration strings. Thanks @​mastermatt! https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/3265

const schema = z.string().duration();
schema.parse("P3Y6M4DT12H30M5S"); // OK
Improvements to z.string().datetime()

Thanks @​bchrobot https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/2522

You can now allow unqualified (timezone-less) datetimes using the local: true flag.

const schema = z.string().datetime({ local: true });
schema.parse("2022-01-01T12:00:00"); // OK

Plus, Zod now validates the day-of-month correctly to ensure no invalid dates (e.g. February 30th) pass validation. Thanks @​szamanr! https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/3391

z.string().base64()

Zod can now validate base64 strings. Thanks @​StefanTerdell! https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/3047

const schema = z.string().base64();
schema.parse("SGVsbG8gV29ybGQ="); // OK
Improved discriminated unions

The following can now be used as discriminator keys in z.discriminatedUnion():

  • ZodOptional
  • ZodNullable
  • ZodReadonly
  • ZodBranded
  • ZodCatch
const schema = z.discriminatedUnion("type", [
  z.object({ type: z.literal("A").optional(), value: z.number() }),
  z.object({ type: z.literal("B").nullable(), value: z.string() }),
  z.object({ type: z.literal("C").readonly(), value: z.boolean() }),
  z.object({ type: z.literal("D").brand<"D">(), value: z.boolean() }),
  z.object({ type: z.literal("E").catch("E"), value: z.unknown() }),
]);
Misc

Breaking changes

There are no breaking changes to the public API of Zod. However some changes can impact ecosystem tools that rely on Zod internals.

ZodFirstPartySchemaTypes

Three new types have been added to the ZodFirstPartySchemaTypes union. This may impact some codegen libraries. https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/3247

+  | ZodPipeline<any, any>
+  | ZodReadonly<any>
+  | ZodSymbol;
Default generics in ZodType

The third argument of the ZodType base class now defaults to unknown. This makes it easier to define recursive schemas and write generic functions that accept Zod schemas.

- class ZodType<Output = any, Def extends ZodTypeDef = ZodTypeDef, Input = Output> {}
+ class ZodType<Output = unknown, Def extends ZodTypeDef = ZodTypeDef, Input = unknown> {}
Unrecognized keys in .pick() and .omit()

This version fixes a bug where unknown keys were accidentally accepted in .pick() and omit(). This has been fixed, which could cause compiler errors in some user code. https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/3255

z.object({ 
  name: z.string() 
}).pick({
  notAKey: true // no longer allowed
})

Bugfixes and performance

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate Renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Branch automerge failure

This PR was configured for branch automerge. However, this is not possible, so it has been raised as a PR instead.

  • Branch has one or more failed status checks

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (rebase) April 15, 2024 11:27
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-minor-patch branch from 7560fd7 to 5c3d4ee Compare April 17, 2024 14:13
@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.05%. Comparing base (7ecc355) to head (8e4b0ff).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #68   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.05%   99.05%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines         851      851           
  Branches       71       71           
=======================================
  Hits          843      843           
  Misses          7        7           
  Partials        1        1
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 98.47% <ø> (ø)
unit 35.13% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-minor-patch branch 14 times, most recently from 32f3ea9 to 27f9fbf Compare April 25, 2024 09:36
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-minor-patch branch 9 times, most recently from 7c80e22 to 4fb34d6 Compare April 30, 2024 11:58
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-minor-patch branch from 4fb34d6 to 8e4b0ff Compare April 30, 2024 17:15
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 31978b8 into master Apr 30, 2024
7 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/all-minor-patch branch April 30, 2024 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@mrhyde