Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

start with non-vbank ERTP asset? #10

Closed
3 tasks
dckc opened this issue Aug 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks

start with non-vbank ERTP asset? #10

dckc opened this issue Aug 4, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@dckc
Copy link
Collaborator

dckc commented Aug 4, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I just landed the first chunk of work on supporting non-vbank assets:

So we could just make a plain ERTP work-alike for stATOM. We could mint it using a PSM that trades for testnet-ATOM (photon, I think).

  • change proposal script to start a mintHolder instance instead of adding a vbank asset
  • deploy updates walletFactory contract to devnet (I'm working on PR for that)
  • update vaults, PSM clients to support non-vbank assets

Updating the web UI clients might be significant work, but tweaking the CLI tools should take just a few lines.

p.s. or we could just use the REPL as our PSM and Vaults client
@dckc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dckc commented Aug 5, 2023

We could mint it using a PSM that trades for testnet-ATOM (photon, I think).

Not so fast. The existing PSM contract always trades something for IST. It doesn't support arbitrary pairs. Boring.

@0xpatrickdev 0xpatrickdev mentioned this issue Aug 8, 2023
Merged
@dckc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dckc commented Aug 21, 2023

given progress on a real IBC denom, let's punt on this.

@dckc dckc closed this as completed Aug 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dckc