Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add upper limit to gas price in light user op hash #43
feat: add upper limit to gas price in light user op hash #43
Changes from 6 commits
d4566d7
f236450
9c7d241
0837c9c
411c290
ab29848
c82d369
bc53bcf
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
vaguely tempted to pack a few of these to save the calldata but probably not worth it idk
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If packing is added, one suggestion would be to pack the
callGasLimit
andverificationGasLimit
values into abytes32
value calledaccountGasLimits
, since that would match thePackedUserOperation
struct itselfI think it'd also be possible to pack
preVerificationGas
andmaxPriorityFeePerGas
together, but that pairing would be a bit less natural and wouldn't matchPackedUserOperation