Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

initial comments/proposed changes #1

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024
Merged

initial comments/proposed changes #1

merged 9 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

wminshew
Copy link
Contributor

@wminshew wminshew requested a review from r0ohafza January 25, 2024 00:12
@wminshew wminshew force-pushed the wm-review-2 branch 2 times, most recently from 2978291 to 7312fde Compare January 25, 2024 00:19
packages/splits-v2/src/SplitsWarehouse.sol Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/splits-v2/src/SplitsWarehouse.sol Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/splits-v2/src/SplitsWarehouse.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/splits-v2/src/SplitsWarehouse.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/splits-v2/src/SplitsWarehouse.sol Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/splits-v2/src/SplitsWarehouse.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/splits-v2/src/splitters/SplitWalletV2.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -207,6 +208,7 @@ contract ERC6909X is ERC6909, EIP712, Nonces, IERC6909X {
);
}

/// what is this exposed for?
function DOMAIN_SEPARATOR() external view virtual returns (bytes32) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

useful for anyone trying to integrate

@r0ohafza r0ohafza merged commit 629242c into main Jan 29, 2024
@r0ohafza r0ohafza deleted the wm-review-2 branch January 29, 2024 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants