You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using igda for detecting sublines of one bacteria in a pooled PacBio Sequel II genomic data. The average length of reads is 8kb. I find that igda gives me very few contigs (3-6) for most of datasets. I do not expect 100s of sublines, but I do expect at least 2-3. In my igda results, I get 6 contigs placed very very far apart from each other on a 5Mb genome. From variant analysis, I know that the loci covered by these contigs are either deleted or have a high frequency of mutation (~80%). Do you think that these results could be due to smaller length of reads, thus limiting the maximum achievable length of the contig by igda? Or is it that I am doing something wrong (I followed exactly the commands suggested on the usage page for Sequel II reads)? Any insights will be super useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @zhixingfeng ,
I am using igda for detecting sublines of one bacteria in a pooled PacBio Sequel II genomic data. The average length of reads is 8kb. I find that igda gives me very few contigs (3-6) for most of datasets. I do not expect 100s of sublines, but I do expect at least 2-3. In my igda results, I get 6 contigs placed very very far apart from each other on a 5Mb genome. From variant analysis, I know that the loci covered by these contigs are either deleted or have a high frequency of mutation (~80%). Do you think that these results could be due to smaller length of reads, thus limiting the maximum achievable length of the contig by igda? Or is it that I am doing something wrong (I followed exactly the commands suggested on the usage page for Sequel II reads)? Any insights will be super useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: