Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

End-to-end style train accuracy improves too quickly, am I wrong somewhere? #10

Open
Suncheng2022 opened this issue Apr 23, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@Suncheng2022
Copy link

This is the first few iterations training log

2023-04-23 16:36:09,169 - mmdet - INFO - workflow: [('train', 1)], max: 12 epochs
2023-04-23 16:36:30,358 - mmcv - INFO - Reducer buckets have been rebuilt in this iteration.
2023-04-23 16:37:03,128 - mmdet - INFO - Epoch [1][50/4399] lr: 1.978e-03, eta: 15:48:28, time: 1.079, data_time: 0.408, memory: 7504, loss_rpn_cls: 0.6129, loss_rpn_bbox: 0.3645, loss_cls: 113.8634, acc: 51.2393, loss_bbox: 0.4169, loss: 115.2578, grad_norm: 1112.3063
2023-04-23 16:37:36,244 - mmdet - INFO - Epoch [1][100/4399] lr: 3.976e-03, eta: 12:44:35, time: 0.662, data_time: 0.006, memory: 7504, loss_rpn_cls: 0.3718, loss_rpn_bbox: 0.2817, loss_cls: 0.5315, acc: 86.3486, loss_bbox: 0.4726, loss: 1.6576, grad_norm: 10.5886
2023-04-23 16:38:09,524 - mmdet - INFO - Epoch [1][150/4399] lr: 5.974e-03, eta: 11:43:52, time: 0.666, data_time: 0.006, memory: 7504, loss_rpn_cls: 0.2926, loss_rpn_bbox: 0.2397, loss_cls: 0.4812, acc: 85.5732, loss_bbox: 0.5225, loss: 1.5360, grad_norm: 8.0355
2023-04-23 16:38:42,793 - mmdet - INFO - Epoch [1][200/4399] lr: 7.972e-03, eta: 11:13:12, time: 0.665, data_time: 0.006, memory: 7504, loss_rpn_cls: 0.2514, loss_rpn_bbox: 0.2163, loss_cls: 0.4500, acc: 86.1561, loss_bbox: 0.5144, loss: 1.4320, grad_norm: 8.1893
2023-04-23 16:39:16,145 - mmdet - INFO - Epoch [1][250/4399] lr: 9.970e-03, eta: 10:54:52, time: 0.667, data_time: 0.006, memory: 7504, loss_rpn_cls: 0.2354, loss_rpn_bbox: 0.2269, loss_cls: 0.4661, acc: 85.6025, loss_bbox: 0.5505, loss: 1.4789, grad_norm: 8.3150

@Suncheng2022
Copy link
Author

The results obtained from the implementation of end-to end inference are as follows,is it normal, the AP maybe low?:

Evaluating bbox...
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.139
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.216
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.151
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= s | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.077
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= m | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.167
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= l | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.291
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=300 catIds= r] = 0.176
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=300 catIds= c] = 0.137
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=300 catIds= f] = 0.128
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.197
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= s | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.095
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= m | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.217
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= l | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.395
OrderedDict([('bbox_AP', 0.139), ('bbox_AP50', 0.216), ('bbox_AP75', 0.151), ('bbox_APs', 0.077), ('bbox_APm', 0.167), ('bbox_APl', 0.291), ('bbox_APr', 0.176), ('bbox_APc', 0.137), ('bbox_APf', 0.128), ('bbox_mAP_copypaste', 'AP:0.139 AP50:0.216 AP75:0.151 APs:0.077 APm:0.167 APl:0.291 APr:0.176 APc:0.137 APf:0.128')])

@Rzx520
Copy link

Rzx520 commented May 13, 2023

Hello, may I ask how you obtained the lvis_v0.5 dataset,the official website only has v1

@Suncheng2022
Copy link
Author

Hello, may I ask how you obtained the lvis_v0.5 dataset,the official website only has v1

Hello, I just search it in google. Maybe this page help.
(PS: I have been following on this project for a long time, but I have not been able to successfully run the new category evaluation and detection effect, if you are successful can you reply? Wish you success!)

@GitDu6
Copy link

GitDu6 commented Mar 28, 2024

@Suncheng2022 Hello,may I ask you why the end to end inference running so slowly ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants