-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: add bitcoin e2e test deposit_call #2895
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces an end-to-end (e2e) testing framework for Bitcoin deposits and calls within the ZetaChain platform. It adds new test cases to ensure the accuracy and reliability of Bitcoin-related functionalities, including the deposit process and contract interactions. The changes encompass the addition of a dedicated test function, modifications to existing transaction handling, and updates to the changelog to reflect these enhancements. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
…-bitcoin-deposit-and-call
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- changelog.md (1 hunks)
- cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/e2etests/e2etests.go (2 hunks)
- e2e/e2etests/test_bitcoin_deposit_call.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/runner/bitcoin.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
e2e/e2etests/test_bitcoin_deposit_call.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.e2e/runner/bitcoin.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.e2e/e2etests/e2etests.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Additional comments not posted (5)
e2e/runner/bitcoin.go (1)
201-205
: LGTM!The changes address the precision issue mentioned in the past review comment by using
zetabitcoin.GetSatoshis
for the amount conversion. The static fee is also explicitly noted, improving code readability. The error handling for the conversion is done correctly.cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go (1)
293-293
: LGTM!The addition of the
e2etests.TestBitcoinDepositAndCallName
test case to thebitcoinTests
slice is consistent with the PR objective and follows the existing naming convention.e2e/e2etests/e2etests.go (2)
76-76
: LGTM!The constant name is clear, follows the naming convention, and accurately describes the test scenario.
455-462
: LGTM!The
runner.NewE2ETest
instance for theTestBitcoinDepositAndCallName
test scenario is well-defined:
- The test name matches the constant.
- The description accurately summarizes the test scenario.
- The argument definition for the Bitcoin deposit amount is appropriate, with a reasonable default value.
- The
TestBitcoinDepositAndCall
function is referenced correctly as the test implementation.changelog.md (1)
30-30
: Changelog entry looks good.The changelog entry clearly documents the addition of the e2e test for Bitcoin deposit and call, with the PR number and link provided. It is appropriately categorized under the "Tests" section.
Description
Add
bitcoin_deposit_and_call
e2e test.How Has This Been Tested?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation