Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Coverity CID :207965] Missing break in switch in drivers/i2c/i2c_ll_stm32_v1.c #22442

Closed
zephyrbot opened this issue Feb 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: low Low impact/importance bug

Comments

@zephyrbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Static code scan issues found in file:

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/tree/a3e89e84a801d9bc048b0ee2177f0fb11d1a925a/drivers/i2c/i2c_ll_stm32_v1.c

Category: Control flow issues
Function: handle_rxne
Component: Drivers
CID: 207965

Please fix or provide comments in coverity using the link:

https://scan9.coverity.com/reports.htm#v32951/p12996.

Note: This issue was created automatically. Priority was set based on classification
of the file affected and the impact field in coverity. Assignees were set using the CODEOWNERS file.

@zephyrbot zephyrbot added bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: low Low impact/importance bug labels Feb 3, 2020
@ydamigos
Copy link
Collaborator

ydamigos commented Feb 4, 2020

I don't have access to coverity's report, but if it is referring to lines 293-295, fallthrough is intentional.

@erwango
Copy link
Member

erwango commented Feb 5, 2020

@ydamigos indeed.
I've updated the record and set it as intentional/ignore

@erwango erwango closed this as completed Feb 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: low Low impact/importance bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants