Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Coverity CID :207971] Negative array index read in subsys/net/l2/ppp/ipcp.c #22439

Closed
zephyrbot opened this issue Feb 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees
Labels
area: Networking bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: medium Medium impact/importance bug

Comments

@zephyrbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Static code scan issues found in file:

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/tree/a3e89e84a801d9bc048b0ee2177f0fb11d1a925a/subsys/net/l2/ppp/ipcp.c#L190

Category: Memory - illegal accesses
Function: ipcp_config_info_req
Component: Networking
CID: 207971

Details:

184             struct ppp_context *ctx;
185             struct in_addr addr;
186             int ret;
187    
188             ctx = CONTAINER_OF(fsm, struct ppp_context, ipcp.fsm);
189    
>>>     CID 207971:  Memory - illegal accesses  (REVERSE_NEGATIVE)
>>>     You might be using variable "address_option_idx" before verifying that it is >= 0.
190             if (address_option_idx < 0) {
191                 /* Address option was not present */
192                 return -EINVAL;
193             }
194    
195             code = PPP_CONFIGURE_ACK;

Please fix or provide comments in coverity using the link:

https://scan9.coverity.com/reports.htm#v32951/p12996.

Note: This issue was created automatically. Priority was set based on classification
of the file affected and the impact field in coverity. Assignees were set using the CODEOWNERS file.

@zephyrbot zephyrbot added bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: medium Medium impact/importance bug labels Feb 3, 2020
@jukkar
Copy link
Member

jukkar commented Feb 12, 2020

False positive, the code never uses address_option_idx when its value is < 0

@jukkar jukkar closed this as completed Feb 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: Networking bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: medium Medium impact/importance bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants