You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is to provide greater consistency with the representation of lines in the link and geometry tables. Instead of x_coord, y_coord, z_coord, one would have
POINT (x_coord, y_coord) or
POINT Z (x_coord, y_coord, z_coord)
Furthermore, wkt provides an option for linear references
POINT M (x_coord, y_coord, lr) or
POINT ZM (x_coord, y_coord, z_coord, lr)
Do PMC members think this change would provide significant benefit?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is to provide greater consistency with the representation of lines in the link and geometry tables. Instead of x_coord, y_coord, z_coord, one would have
POINT (x_coord, y_coord) or
POINT Z (x_coord, y_coord, z_coord)
Furthermore, wkt provides an option for linear references
POINT M (x_coord, y_coord, lr) or
POINT ZM (x_coord, y_coord, z_coord, lr)
Do PMC members think this change would provide significant benefit?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: