Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename unwindPath to unwind #230

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 23, 2018
Merged

Rename unwindPath to unwind #230

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 23, 2018

Conversation

juanjoDiaz
Copy link
Collaborator

Since we are breaking the API for the next version. Let's try to make it as good as possible.

This PR rename unwindPath to just unwind which is nicer and cleaner.

I'd suggest that you guys take a look at the current options to see if there is anything that could be improve. I'm happy to do the changes if you just let me know.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling d06d566 on juanjoDiaz:improvement/rename_unwindPath_to_unwind into e6a64ec on zemirco:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 23, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 1a6d07a on juanjoDiaz:improvement/rename_unwindPath_to_unwind into 421baad on zemirco:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling d06d566 on juanjoDiaz:improvement/rename_unwindPath_to_unwind into e6a64ec on zemirco:master.

@knownasilya
Copy link
Collaborator

We can also probably rename fieldList in the cli to use dashes.

@juanjoDiaz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yup. Just added it and fixed the conflict.

(I used merge instead of rebase because you are squashing the commits anyway.)

@knownasilya knownasilya merged commit 7143bc7 into zemirco:master Jan 23, 2018
@juanjoDiaz juanjoDiaz deleted the improvement/rename_unwindPath_to_unwind branch February 4, 2018 22:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants