We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
get
set
The set and get methods for StoreTests should be independently implemented but the ZipStore tests use the store methods, meaning that the behavior will be tested against itself rather than the expected behavior. This issue is to decide if the get and set methods for TestZipStore should be changed to not use ZipStore methods.
TestZipStore
ZipStore
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
good catch, I would recommend implementing separate test-suite-only get and set methods, as per the other stores
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The
set
andget
methods for StoreTests should be independently implemented but the ZipStore tests use the store methods, meaning that the behavior will be tested against itself rather than the expected behavior. This issue is to decide if theget
andset
methods forTestZipStore
should be changed to not useZipStore
methods.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: