Support basic account action for admin #934
Conversation
|
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@gusah009 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis update enhances the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
krapie
requested review from
krapie and
hackerwins
and removed request for
krapie
gusah009
force-pushed
the
support-basic-account-action-for-admin
branch
from
6d60b0a to
98dc7c5
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (10)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (8 hunks)
- api/types/user_fields.go (2 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (2 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (9 hunks)
- server/backend/database/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/admin_server.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (1 hunks)
- server/users/users.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (34)
api/types/user_fields.go (3)
25-25: LGTM!The comment update provides clarity on the relationship between
SignupFieldsandChangePasswordFields.
39-47: LGTM!The
ChangePasswordFieldsstruct is well-defined and consistent withSignupFields. The validation rules are appropriate.
49-52: LGTM!The
Validatemethod forChangePasswordFieldsis consistent with the existingSignupFieldsvalidation.server/users/users.go (1)
98-109: LGTM!The
DeleteAccountByNamefunction is straightforward and handles errors appropriately.api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (6)
31-31: LGTM!The
DeleteAccountRPC is well-defined and follows the existing pattern.
32-32: LGTM!The
ChangePasswordRPC is well-defined and follows the existing pattern.
67-70: LGTM!The
DeleteAccountRequestmessage is well-defined and includes necessary fields for account deletion.
72-73: LGTM!The
DeleteAccountResponsemessage is appropriately defined as an acknowledgment.
75-79: LGTM!The
ChangePasswordRequestmessage is well-defined and includes necessary fields for password change.
81-82: LGTM!The
ChangePasswordResponsemessage is appropriately defined as an acknowledgment.server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (1)
45-47: Verify the security implications of excludingChangePasswordandDeleteAccountfrom authentication.Excluding these methods from authentication checks might expose security vulnerabilities. Ensure that these methods should indeed be accessible without authentication.
server/backend/database/database.go (2)
146-147: LGTM! Verify error handling forDeleteUserInfoByName.The method enhances the interface's functionality for user management. Ensure that potential errors and edge cases are handled correctly.
149-150: LGTM! Verify error handling forChangePassword.The method enhances the interface's functionality for user management. Ensure that potential errors and edge cases are handled correctly.
server/rpc/admin_server.go (2)
98-119: LGTM! Verify error handling forDeleteAccount.The method enhances the server's capabilities for user account management. Ensure that potential errors and edge cases are handled correctly.
121-147: LGTM! Verify error handling forChangePassword.The method enhances the server's capabilities for user account management. Ensure that potential errors and edge cases are handled correctly.
api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (13)
55-57: LGTM!The addition of
AdminServiceDeleteAccountProcedureis correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
58-60: LGTM!The addition of
AdminServiceChangePasswordProcedureis correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
99-99: LGTM!The addition of the
DeleteAccountmethod in theAdminServiceClientinterface is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
100-100: LGTM!The addition of the
ChangePasswordmethod in theAdminServiceClientinterface is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
206-206: LGTM!The addition of the
deleteAccountclient in theadminServiceClientstruct is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
207-207: LGTM!The addition of the
changePasswordclient in theadminServiceClientstruct is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
231-234: LGTM!The addition of the
DeleteAccountmethod in theadminServiceClientimplementation is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
236-239: LGTM!The addition of the
ChangePasswordmethod in theadminServiceClientimplementation is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
300-300: LGTM!The addition of the
DeleteAccountmethod in theAdminServiceHandlerinterface is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
301-301: LGTM!The addition of the
ChangePasswordmethod in theAdminServiceHandlerinterface is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
331-335: LGTM!The addition of the
adminServiceDeleteAccountHandlerin theNewAdminServiceHandlerfunction is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
336-340: LGTM!The addition of the
adminServiceChangePasswordHandlerin theNewAdminServiceHandlerfunction is correct and aligns with the new RPC procedure.
445-451: LGTM!The addition of the unimplemented
DeleteAccountandChangePasswordmethods in theUnimplementedAdminServiceHandleris correct and aligns with the new RPC procedures.api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (6)
18-20: Ensure response schema exists.The response references
yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangePassword.yorkie.v1.ChangePasswordResponse. Verify that this schema is defined correctly undercomponents/responses.Verification successful
Ensure response schema exists.
The
yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangePassword.yorkie.v1.ChangePasswordResponseschema is correctly referenced and defined undercomponents/schemasasyorkie.v1.ChangePasswordResponse.
api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml: Lines defining the schema reference and its title.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the ChangePasswordResponse schema. # Test: Search for the ChangePasswordResponse schema. Expect: Schema definition exists. rg --type yaml $'ChangePasswordResponse'Length of output: 677
42-44: Ensure response schema exists.The response references
yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponse. Verify that this schema is defined correctly undercomponents/responses.Verification successful
The
DeleteAccountResponseschema is defined and correctly referenced.The schema
DeleteAccountResponseexists undercomponents/schemasand is correctly referenced in theapi/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlfile.
- Lines confirming the existence and definition:
api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml: yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponse:api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml: $ref: '#/components/schemas/yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponse'api/docs/yorkie/v1.admin.openapi.yaml: yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponse:api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml: title: DeleteAccountResponseScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the DeleteAccountResponse schema. # Test: Search for the DeleteAccountResponse schema. Expect: Schema definition exists. rg --type yaml $'DeleteAccountResponse'Length of output: 668
674-693: Ensure property data types are correct.The properties
currentPassword,newPassword, andusernameare defined as strings. Verify that these properties align with the expected data types.Verification successful
Ensure property data types are correct.
The properties
currentPassword,newPassword, andusernamein theyorkie.v1.ChangePasswordRequestschema are correctly defined as strings.
currentPassword: type: stringnewPassword: type: stringusername: type: stringScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the data types of properties in ChangePasswordRequest schema. # Test: Search for the property definitions. Expect: Properties are defined as strings. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'ChangePasswordRequest'Length of output: 2395
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the complete property definitions in ChangePasswordRequest schema. # Test: Search for the complete property definitions. Expect: Properties are defined as strings. rg --type yaml -A 10 $'yorkie.v1.ChangePasswordRequest'Length of output: 3029
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the complete property definitions in ChangePasswordRequest schema. # Test: Search for the complete property definitions. Expect: Properties are defined as strings. rg --type yaml -A 20 $'yorkie.v1.ChangePasswordRequest'Length of output: 5272
13-17: Ensure request body schema exists.The request body references
yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangePassword.yorkie.v1.ChangePasswordRequest. Verify that this schema is defined correctly undercomponents/requestBodies.
723-737: Ensure property data types are correct.The properties
passwordandusernameare defined as strings. Verify that these properties align with the expected data types.Verification successful
Ensure property data types are correct.
The properties
passwordandusernamein theDeleteAccountRequestschema are both correctly defined as strings.
password: type: stringusername: type: stringScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the data types of properties in DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the property definitions. Expect: Properties are defined as strings. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'DeleteAccountRequest'Length of output: 2371
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the data types of properties in DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the specific data type definitions of the `password` and `username` properties. rg --type yaml -A 3 -B 2 $'password:\n type: string' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml rg --type yaml -A 3 -B 2 $'username:\n type: string' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 567
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the data types of properties in DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the specific data type definitions of the `password` and `username` properties using multiline mode. rg --multiline --type yaml -A 3 -B 2 $'password:\n type: string' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml rg --multiline --type yaml -A 3 -B 2 $'username:\n type: string' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 207
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the data types of properties in DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the entire schema definition of `DeleteAccountRequest` and include surrounding lines for context. rg --multiline --type yaml -A 10 -B 2 'yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 1714
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the data types of properties in DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the entire schema definition of `DeleteAccountRequest` and include more surrounding lines for context. rg --multiline --type yaml -A 15 -B 2 'yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 2307
37-41: Ensure request body schema exists.The request body references
yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest. Verify that this schema is defined correctly undercomponents/requestBodies.Verification successful
The
yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequestschema is defined in theadmin.openapi.yamlfile.
- The schema
yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequestis present undercomponents/schemas.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the DeleteAccountRequest schema. Expect: Schema definition exists. rg --type yaml $'DeleteAccountRequest'Length of output: 663
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest schema. Expect: Schema definition exists. rg --type yaml $'components:\n schemas:\n yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest'Length of output: 268
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest schema. Expect: Schema definition exists. rg --type yaml --multiline $'components:\n schemas:\n yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any occurrence of the yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest schema. Expect: Schema definition or reference exists. rg --type yaml 'yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest'Length of output: 601
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest schema. # Test: Search for the definition of yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest. Expect: Schema definition exists. rg --type yaml --multiline 'yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest:\n'Length of output: 249
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your contribution.
I have two things to suggest:
-
User vs. Account
As you can see in the database, we are using the wordUser, so we might need to keep consistency for the word describing "user". -
Test codes for Admin RPC
How about adding test codes for newly introduced APIs?TestAdminRPCServerBackend()test function inserver/rpc/server_test.gowill be the best place to put test codes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
api/types/user_fields_test.go (1)
34-34: Update function name for consistency.Ensure that the function name
TestSignupFieldsis updated toTestUserFieldsto reflect the new struct name.
api/types/user_fields_test.go: func TestSignupFields(t *testing.T)Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.
The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all struct instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.
Verify the struct renaming consistency.
The renaming of the struct to
UserFieldsappears consistent across the codebase. To ensure completeness, verify that there are no remaining instances of the old struct nameSignupFields.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all struct instances of `UserFields` match the new name. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'UserFields'Length of output: 4169
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify there are no remaining instances of the old struct name `SignupFields`. # Test: Search for any lingering instances of `SignupFields`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go -A 5 $'SignupFields'Length of output: 404
admin/client.go (1)
159-165: Ensure all instances of theSignUpmethod are updated toCreateUser.The transition from
SignUptoCreateUseris in progress, but there are still references to the deprecatedSignUpmethod. Verify that all calls to the old method have been updated to use the newCreateUsermethod.
server/rpc/admin_server.go: DeprecatedSignUpmethod still present.server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go: Test cases still usingSignUp.api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go: DeprecatedSignUpmethod still present.Analysis chain
LGTM! Ensure the new method is used correctly throughout the codebase.
The
CreateUsermethod replaces the previousSignUpmethod, improving clarity. Verify that all calls to the old method have been updated.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CreateUser` match the new method signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new method name. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateUser'Length of output: 23349
server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (1)
641-641: Update function documentation to reflect method name change.The function documentation should be updated to reflect the change from
SignUptoCreateUserfor clarity.-// RunAdminSignUpTest runs the CreateUser test in admin. +// RunAdminCreateUserTest runs the CreateUser test in admin.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (12)
- admin/client.go (1 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (9 hunks)
- api/types/user_fields.go (1 hunks)
- api/types/user_fields_test.go (1 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (3 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (9 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/admin_server.go (2 hunks)
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (2 hunks)
- server/users/users.go (2 hunks)
- test/integration/user_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml
- api/types/user_fields.go
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go
- server/users/users.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: build
api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go
[failure] 422-422:
duplicate case AdminServiceCreateUserProcedure (constant "/yorkie.v1.AdminService/CreateUser" of type string) in expression switch
[failure] 422-422:
duplicate case AdminServiceCreateUserProcedure (constant "/yorkie.v1.AdminService/CreateUser" of type string) in expression switch
[failure] 422-422:
duplicate case AdminServiceCreateUserProcedure (constant "/yorkie.v1.AdminService/CreateUser" of type string) in expression switch
[failure] 422-422:
duplicate case AdminServiceCreateUserProcedure (constant "/yorkie.v1.AdminService/CreateUser" of type string) in expression switch
GitHub Check: bench
api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go
[failure] 422-422:
duplicate case AdminServiceCreateUserProcedure (constant "/yorkie.v1.AdminService/CreateUser" of type string) in expression switch
GitHub Check: sharding_test
api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go
[failure] 422-422:
duplicate case AdminServiceCreateUserProcedure (constant "/yorkie.v1.AdminService/CreateUser" of type string) in expression switch
Additional comments not posted (29)
test/integration/user_test.go (3)
46-46: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all method calls to
CreateUsermatch the new name.Verification successful
All method calls to
CreateUserare consistent with the new name.The verification confirms that all occurrences of
CreateUsermatch the new name across the codebase.
server/users/users.goserver/rpc/admin_server.goserver/rpc/testcases/testcases.goserver/rpc/interceptors/admin.goserver/backend/database/database.gotest/integration/user_test.goserver/backend/database/mongo/client.goserver/backend/database/memory/database.goserver/backend/database/testcases/testcases.goadmin/client.goapi/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.goapi/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `CreateUser` match the new name. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateUser'Length of output: 23349
43-43: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all method calls to
CreateUsermatch the new name.Verification successful
The method usage of
CreateUseris consistent across the codebase.The renaming from
SignUptoCreateUserhas been correctly applied throughout the codebase.
- All instances of the method call use
CreateUser.- No remaining references to the old method name
SignUpwere found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `CreateUser` match the new name. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateUser'Length of output: 23349
49-49: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all method calls to
CreateUsermatch the new name.Verification successful
All instances of
CreateUsermatch the expected usage.The method
CreateUseris consistently used across the codebase, and there are no discrepancies in its naming.
server/users/users.gotest/integration/user_test.goserver/rpc/admin_server.goserver/rpc/testcases/testcases.goserver/rpc/interceptors/admin.goserver/backend/database/database.goserver/backend/database/memory/database.goserver/backend/database/mongo/client.goserver/backend/database/testcases/testcases.goadmin/client.goapi/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.goapi/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `CreateUser` match the new name. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateUser'Length of output: 23349
api/types/user_fields_test.go (7)
41-41: LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all struct instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.Verification successful
LGTM! All struct instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.The verification confirms that all instances of
UserFieldsin the codebase are consistent with the new name.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all struct instances of `UserFields` match the new name. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'UserFields'Length of output: 4169
48-48: LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all struct instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.Verification successful
Verification Successful: All instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.The struct
UserFieldsis consistently used across the codebase without any discrepancies.
server/rpc/admin_server.goapi/types/user_fields_test.goapi/types/user_fields.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all struct instances of `UserFields` match the new name. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'UserFields'Length of output: 4169
69-69: LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all struct instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Struct Usage Consistent
All instances of the
UserFieldsstruct match the new name across the codebase.
server/rpc/admin_server.goapi/types/user_fields_test.goapi/types/user_fields.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all struct instances of `UserFields` match the new name. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'UserFields'Length of output: 4169
55-55: LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all struct instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.Verification successful
All instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.The struct
UserFieldsis consistently used across the codebase without any discrepancies in naming.
server/rpc/admin_server.goapi/types/user_fields.goapi/types/user_fields_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all struct instances of `UserFields` match the new name. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'UserFields'Length of output: 4169
62-62: LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all struct instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.Verification successful
Verification successful: All instances of
UserFieldsmatch the expected name.
server/rpc/admin_server.goapi/types/user_fields.goapi/types/user_fields_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all struct instances of `UserFields` match the new name. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'UserFields'Length of output: 4169
76-76: LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all struct instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.Verification successful
Verification successful: All instances of
UserFieldsare consistent.
- The struct
UserFieldsis used consistently across the codebase without any indication of a new name.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all struct instances of `UserFields` match the new name. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'UserFields'Length of output: 4169
83-83: LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all struct instances of
UserFieldsmatch the new name.Verification successful
The script output shows multiple instances of
UserFieldsin various files. To confirm if there has been a name change, we need to verify the definition of theUserFieldsstruct. Let's search for the struct definition to see if it has a new name.
Verified: The struct name
UserFieldshas not changed, and all instances in the codebase are consistent with this name.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all struct instances of `UserFields` match the new name. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'UserFields'Length of output: 4169
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of the UserFields struct to check for any name changes. # Search for the definition of the UserFields struct. rg --type go 'type UserFields struct'Length of output: 89
api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (11)
60-63: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
65-67: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
78-81: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
83-84: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
86-89: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
92-93: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
54-57:
LGTM!The code changes are approved.
59-59: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
31-31: LGTM! But verify the RPC usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all RPC calls to
CreateUsermatch the new name.Verification successful
Let's update the shell script to search for the
CreateUserRPC in all.protofiles without specifying the file type.
LGTM! But verify the RPC usage in the codebase.
The code changes are approved.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all RPC calls to `CreateUser` match the new name. # Test: Search for the RPC usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type proto -A 5 $'CreateUser'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all RPC calls to `CreateUser` match the new name. # Test: Search for the RPC usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg 'CreateUser' --glob '*.proto' -A 5Length of output: 1167
33-33: LGTM! But verify the RPC usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all RPC calls to
DeleteAccountmatch the new name.Verification successful
RPC usage for
DeleteAccountis consistent.The search results show that the
DeleteAccountRPC and its related request/response messages are defined inapi/yorkie/v1/admin.proto, and there are no other occurrences in the.protofiles.
api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto:rpc DeleteAccount(DeleteAccountRequest) returns (DeleteAccountResponse) {}Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all RPC calls to `DeleteAccount` match the new name. # Test: Search for the RPC usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type proto -A 5 $'DeleteAccount'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all RPC calls to `DeleteAccount` match the new name. # Test: Search for the RPC usage in .proto files. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --glob '*.proto' -A 5 'DeleteAccount'Length of output: 1063
34-34: LGTM! But verify the RPC usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all RPC calls to
ChangePasswordmatch the new name.Verification successful
Verification Complete: RPC usage of
ChangePasswordis consistent across the codebase.The
ChangePasswordRPC call is used in multiple files, includingserver/users/users.go,server/rpc/admin_server.go, and others. All occurrences match the new name and implementation inadmin.proto.
server/users/users.goserver/rpc/admin_server.goserver/rpc/interceptors/admin.goserver/backend/database/database.goserver/backend/database/mongo/client.goserver/backend/database/memory/database.goapi/yorkie/v1/admin.protoapi/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.goapi/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.goapi/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all RPC calls to `ChangePassword` match the new name. # Test: Search for the RPC usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type proto -A 5 $'ChangePassword'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all RPC calls to `ChangePassword` match the new name. # Find all .proto files and search for the RPC usage. fd -e proto -x rg 'ChangePassword' {}Length of output: 184
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all RPC calls to `ChangePassword` match the new name. # Search for the RPC usage in all file types. rg 'ChangePassword'Length of output: 7270
server/rpc/admin_server.go (2)
131-156: LGTM! Verify the implementation of called functions.The
ChangePasswordmethod is well-structured, with proper error handling and validation. Ensure that theusers.IsCorrectPasswordandusers.ChangePasswordfunctions are correctly implemented and handle errors appropriately.Verification successful
Verification successful.
The
IsCorrectPasswordandChangePasswordfunctions are correctly implemented with proper error handling.
IsCorrectPasswordretrieves user info, compares the hashed password, and returns the user info if the password matches.ChangePasswordhashes the new password and updates it in the database.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `users.IsCorrectPassword` and `users.ChangePassword`. # Test: Search for the function definitions. Expect: Correct implementation with proper error handling. rg --type go -A 10 $'func IsCorrectPassword' rg --type go -A 10 $'func ChangePassword'Length of output: 1035
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the complete implementation of `IsCorrectPassword` function. rg --type go -A 20 'func IsCorrectPassword' server/users/users.go # Fetch the complete implementation of `ChangePassword` function. rg --type go -A 20 'func ChangePassword' server/users/users.goLength of output: 854
108-128: LGTM! Verify the implementation of called functions.The
DeleteAccountmethod is well-structured, with proper error handling and validation. Ensure that theusers.IsCorrectPasswordandusers.DeleteAccountByNamefunctions are correctly implemented and handle errors appropriately.Verification successful
Verified: The
DeleteAccountmethod inadmin_server.gois well-structured, with proper error handling and validation. Bothusers.IsCorrectPasswordandusers.DeleteAccountByNameare correctly implemented and handle errors appropriately.
IsCorrectPasswordretrieves user info and compares the provided password with the stored hash.DeleteAccountByNamedeletes the user info from the database and handles any errors that may arise.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `users.IsCorrectPassword` and `users.DeleteAccountByName`. # Test: Search for the function definitions. Expect: Correct implementation with proper error handling. rg --type go -A 10 $'func IsCorrectPassword' rg --type go -A 10 $'func DeleteAccountByName'Length of output: 988
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full implementation of `users.IsCorrectPassword` and `users.DeleteAccountByName`. # Fetch the complete implementation of `IsCorrectPassword`. rg --type go -A 20 'func IsCorrectPassword' server/users/users.go # Fetch the complete implementation of `DeleteAccountByName`. rg --type go -A 20 'func DeleteAccountByName' server/users/users.goLength of output: 936
api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (5)
143-152: LGTM! Ensure correct initialization of new clients.The
NewAdminServiceClientfunction initializes clients for the new RPC procedures. Verify their correct initialization.Verification successful
Verified: Correct initialization of new clients.
The
NewAdminServiceClientfunction correctly initializes clients for the new RPC proceduresdeleteAccountandchangePassword.
deleteAccountclient initialized withconnect.NewClient[v1.DeleteAccountRequest, v1.DeleteAccountResponse]changePasswordclient initialized withconnect.NewClient[v1.ChangePasswordRequest, v1.ChangePasswordResponse]Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization of new clients in `NewAdminServiceClient`. # Test: Search for the client initialization. Expect: Correct initialization in the function. rg --type go -A 10 $'connect.NewClient'Length of output: 9805
216-217: LGTM! Ensure correct integration of new clients.The
adminServiceClientstruct includes new fields for theDeleteAccountandChangePasswordclients. Verify their correct integration.Verification successful
LGTM! The
deleteAccountandchangePasswordclients are correctly integrated into theadminServiceClientstruct.The new clients are properly added and utilized in the respective methods, ensuring their correct integration.
deleteAccountclient initialization and usage found.changePasswordclient initialization and usage found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of new clients in `adminServiceClient`. # Test: Search for the client fields. Expect: Correct integration in the struct. rg --type go -A 5 $'deleteAccount' rg --type go -A 5 $'changePassword'Length of output: 3780
57-62: LGTM! Ensure correct integration of new RPC procedures.The new RPC procedures
DeleteAccountandChangePasswordenhance theAdminService. Verify their correct integration.Verification successful
LGTM! The new RPC procedures
DeleteAccountandChangePasswordare correctly integrated.The integration of the new RPC procedures
DeleteAccountandChangePasswordenhances theAdminService. The procedures are well-defined and implemented across various files, ensuring proper functionality.
server/rpc/admin_server.go: Implementation ofDeleteAccountandChangePassword.server/users/users.go: Supporting functions forDeleteAccountandChangePassword.api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.go: Definitions for request and response messages.api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go: Client-side and server-side handlers for the procedures.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of new RPC procedures. # Test: Search for the procedure usage. Expect: Correct integration in the service. rg --type go -A 5 $'DeleteAccount' rg --type go -A 5 $'ChangePassword'Length of output: 34678
103-104: LGTM! Ensure correct implementation of new methods.The new methods
DeleteAccountandChangePasswordenhance theAdminServiceClientinterface. Verify their correct implementation.Verification successful
The methods
DeleteAccountandChangePasswordare correctly implemented in theadminServiceClient.
DeleteAccountmethod implementation found inapi/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go.ChangePasswordmethod implementation found inapi/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of new methods in `AdminServiceClient`. # Test: Search for the method definitions. Expect: Correct implementation in the client. rg --type go -A 10 $'func (c *adminServiceClient) DeleteAccount' rg --type go -A 10 $'func (c *adminServiceClient) ChangePassword'Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of new methods in `AdminServiceClient`. # Test: Search for the method definitions more broadly. rg 'func (c \*adminServiceClient) DeleteAccount' --type go -A 10 rg 'func (c \*adminServiceClient) ChangePassword' --type go -A 10Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of any references to `DeleteAccount` and `ChangePassword` methods in the codebase. # Test: Search for references to the methods. rg 'DeleteAccount' --type go rg 'ChangePassword' --type goLength of output: 10493
473-479: LGTM! Ensure appropriate error messages for unimplemented methods.The
UnimplementedAdminServiceHandlerstruct includes unimplemented methods forDeleteAccountandChangePassword, ensuring appropriate error messages.server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (1)
649-649: EnsureCreateUsermethod aligns with intended functionality.Verify that the
CreateUsermethod correctly replaces theSignUpmethod and that the test cases remain valid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (3)
13-24: Ensure the description field is filled.The description field for the
ChangeUserPasswordendpoint is currently empty. Providing a meaningful description enhances the API documentation.- description: "" + description: "Endpoint to change a user's password."
37-48: Ensure the description field is filled.The description field for the
CreateUserendpoint is currently empty. Providing a meaningful description enhances the API documentation.- description: "" + description: "Endpoint to create a new user."
49-60: Ensure the description field is filled.The description field for the
DeleteAccountendpoint is currently empty. Providing a meaningful description enhances the API documentation.- description: "" + description: "Endpoint to delete a user account."
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (9)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (9 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (3 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (9 hunks)
- server/backend/database/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/admin_server.go (2 hunks)
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (1 hunks)
- server/users/users.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto
- server/backend/database/database.go
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go
- server/users/users.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: bench
server/rpc/admin_server.go
[failure] 134-134:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordRequest
[failure] 135-135:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordResponse
[failure] 156-156:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordResponse
GitHub Check: sharding_test
server/rpc/admin_server.go
[failure] 134-134:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordRequest
[failure] 135-135:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordResponse
[failure] 156-156:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordResponse
GitHub Check: build
server/rpc/admin_server.go
[failure] 134-134:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordRequest
[failure] 135-135:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordResponse
[failure] 156-156:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordResponse (typecheck)
[failure] 134-134:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordRequest
[failure] 135-135:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordResponse
[failure] 156-156:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordResponse) (typecheck)
[failure] 134-134:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordRequest
[failure] 135-135:
undefined: api.ChangePasswordResponse
Additional comments not posted (7)
api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (1)
101-101: LGTM!The
CreateUserprocedure is correctly implemented.Also applies to: 237-239
api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (6)
17-17: Verify the schema reference for the request body.Ensure that
#/components/requestBodies/yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangeUserPassword.yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordRequestis correctly defined in the components section.Verification successful
Schema reference for the request body is correctly defined.
The schema
#/components/requestBodies/yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangeUserPassword.yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordRequestis correctly defined and references the valid schema#/components/schemas/yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordRequest, which includes the necessary properties.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the schema reference for the request body of ChangeUserPassword endpoint. # Test: Search for the schema definition. Expect: Correct definition. rg --type yaml $'yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangeUserPassword.yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordRequest'Length of output: 374
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and display the definition of the schema reference for the request body of ChangeUserPassword endpoint. # Search for the definition of the schema in the components section. rg --type yaml -A 10 'yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangeUserPassword.yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordRequest:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 589
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and display the definition of the schema 'yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordRequest' in the components section. # Search for the definition of the schema in the components section. rg --type yaml -A 10 'yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordRequest:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 870
20-20: Verify the schema reference for the response body.Ensure that
#/components/responses/yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangeUserPassword.yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordResponseis correctly defined in the components section.Verification successful
The schema reference for the response body is correctly defined.
The
#/components/responses/yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangeUserPassword.yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordResponsereference and its corresponding schemayorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordResponseare properly defined in thecomponentssection of theadmin.openapi.yamlfile.
- The response reference is located in
components/responses.- The schema definition is located in
components/schemas.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the schema reference for the response body of ChangeUserPassword endpoint. # Test: Search for the schema definition. Expect: Correct definition. rg --type yaml $'yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangeUserPassword.yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordResponse'Length of output: 375
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and display the definition of yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangeUserPassword.yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordResponse from the components/responses section. # Extract the definition of the specified schema reference. rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.AdminService.ChangeUserPassword.yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordResponse:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 583
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and display the definition of yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordResponse from the components/schemas section. # Extract the definition of the specified schema reference. rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.ChangeUserPasswordResponse:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 863
56-56: Verify the schema reference for the response body.Ensure that
#/components/responses/yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponseis correctly defined in the components section.Verification successful
The schema reference for the response body is correctly defined.
- The reference
#/components/responses/yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponseexists and correctly points to the schemayorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponse.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the schema reference for the response body of DeleteAccount endpoint. # Test: Search for the schema definition. Expect: Correct definition. rg --type yaml $'yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponse'Length of output: 345
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definition of the schema reference for the response body of DeleteAccount endpoint. # Extract the definition of the schema reference. rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponse' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 990
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definition of the schema referenced by DeleteAccountResponse. # Extract the definition of the schema reference. rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountResponse' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 1546
44-44: Verify the schema reference for the response body.Ensure that
#/components/responses/yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserResponseis correctly defined in the components section.Verification successful
The schema reference for the response body is correctly defined.
- The reference
#/components/responses/yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserResponseis present in the components section.- The referenced schema
#/components/schemas/yorkie.v1.CreateUserResponseis also properly defined.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the schema reference for the response body of CreateUser endpoint. # Test: Search for the schema definition. Expect: Correct definition. rg --type yaml $'yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserResponse'Length of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full definition of the schema reference for the response body of CreateUser endpoint. # Test: Search for the full definition of the schema reference. rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserResponse:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 535
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the schema reference for yorkie.v1.CreateUserResponse. # Test: Search for the definition of yorkie.v1.CreateUserResponse. rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.CreateUserResponse:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 821
41-41: Verify the schema reference for the request body.Ensure that
#/components/requestBodies/yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequestis correctly defined in the components section.Verification successful
The schema reference for the request body is correctly defined.
The
#/components/requestBodies/yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequestreference points to a valid schema definition in the components section.
- The schema definition for
yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequestcorrectly references#/components/schemas/yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequest.- The
yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequestschema is properly defined with the necessary properties.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the schema reference for the request body of CreateUser endpoint. # Test: Search for the schema definition. Expect: Correct definition. rg --type yaml $'yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequest'Length of output: 326
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and display the schema definition for yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequest # Extract the relevant section from the YAML file rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.AdminService.CreateUser.yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequest:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 529
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the schema definition for yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequest # Search for the schema definition in the YAML file rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.CreateUserRequest:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 792
53-53: Verify the schema reference for the request body.Ensure that
#/components/requestBodies/yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequestis correctly defined in the components section.Verification successful
The schema reference for the request body is correctly defined.
The reference
#/components/requestBodies/yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequestand its associated schemayorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequestare both properly structured and complete.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the schema reference for the request body of DeleteAccount endpoint. # Test: Search for the schema definition. Expect: Correct definition. rg --type yaml $'yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest'Length of output: 344
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and display the schema definition for the request body of DeleteAccount endpoint. # Extract the schema definition for detailed inspection. rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.AdminService.DeleteAccount.yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 543
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the schema definition for yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest. # Search for the schema definition to ensure it is correctly defined. rg -A 10 'yorkie.v1.DeleteAccountRequest:' api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yamlLength of output: 806
|
@gusah009 There seems to be lint error causing CI to fail. Could you please lint it again? |
gusah009
force-pushed
the
support-basic-account-action-for-admin
branch
from
dadbca8 to
8168ab6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (7)
api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (7)
14-15: Add a description for theChangeUserPasswordendpoint.The description field is currently empty. Adding a description will improve the documentation.
- description: "" + description: "Allows an admin to change a user's password."
39-40: Add a description for theCreateUserendpoint.The description field is currently empty. Adding a description will improve the documentation.
- description: "" + description: "Allows an admin to create a new user."
51-52: Add a description for theDeleteUserendpoint.The description field is currently empty. Adding a description will improve the documentation.
- description: "" + description: "Allows an admin to delete a user."
705-723: Add descriptions for the fields inChangeUserPasswordRequest.The descriptions for the fields are currently empty. Adding descriptions will improve the documentation.
- description: "" + description: "The current password of the user." - description: "" + description: "The new password for the user." - description: "" + description: "The username of the user."
754-767: Add descriptions for the fields inCreateUserRequest.The descriptions for the fields are currently empty. Adding descriptions will improve the documentation.
- description: "" + description: "The password for the new user." - description: "" + description: "The username for the new user."
770-779: Add a description for theuserfield inCreateUserResponse.The description for the
userfield is currently empty. Adding a description will improve the documentation.- description: "" + description: "The newly created user."
782-795: Add descriptions for the fields inDeleteUserRequest.The descriptions for the fields are currently empty. Adding descriptions will improve the documentation.
- description: "" + description: "The password for the user to be deleted." - description: "" + description: "The username of the user to be deleted."
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (12)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (9 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (3 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (9 hunks)
- server/backend/database/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/admin_server.go (3 hunks)
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/server_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (2 hunks)
- server/users/users.go (2 hunks)
- test/sharding/server_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- test/sharding/server_test.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto
- server/backend/database/database.go
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go
- server/users/users.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: build
server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go
[failure] 647-647:
string123!has 3 occurrences, make it a constant (goconst)
Additional comments not posted (18)
server/rpc/server_test.go (3)
178-180: LGTM!The test case name change from "admin signup test" to "admin create user test" accurately reflects the functionality being tested.
186-188: LGTM!The new test case for deleting a user (
admin delete user test) is correctly named and calls the appropriate function.
190-192: LGTM!The new test case for changing a user's password (
admin change password test) is correctly named and calls the appropriate function.server/rpc/admin_server.go (3)
75-93: LGTM!The
CreateUsermethod correctly validates the user fields and creates a new user. Error handling is also appropriately managed.
120-141: LGTM!The
DeleteUsermethod correctly validates the user's password and deletes the user account. Error handling is also appropriately managed.
143-169: LGTM!The
ChangeUserPasswordmethod correctly validates the new password fields, checks the current password, and updates the password. Error handling is also appropriately managed.api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (6)
53-54: LGTM!The
AdminServiceCreateUserProcedureis correctly defined with its fully-qualified name.
57-58: LGTM!The
AdminServiceDeleteUserProcedureis correctly defined with its fully-qualified name.
60-61: LGTM!The
AdminServiceChangeUserPasswordProcedureis correctly defined with its fully-qualified name.
100-101: LGTM!The
CreateUsermethod is correctly added to theAdminServiceClientinterface and implemented in theadminServiceClientstruct.Also applies to: 235-238
102-103: LGTM!The
DeleteUsermethod is correctly added to theAdminServiceClientinterface and implemented in theadminServiceClientstruct.Also applies to: 245-248
103-103: LGTM!The
ChangeUserPasswordmethod is correctly added to theAdminServiceClientinterface and implemented in theadminServiceClientstruct.Also applies to: 250-253
server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (3)
734-801: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The new function
RunAdminChangePasswordTestis well-structured and includes necessary error handling.However, ensure that the function is correctly integrated and used within the codebase.
Verification successful
The function
RunAdminChangePasswordTestis correctly integrated and used within the codebase.
- It is invoked in the
server/rpc/server_test.gofile, indicating proper integration into the test suite.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the function usage of `RunAdminChangePasswordTest` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Appropriate integration and usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'RunAdminChangePasswordTest'Length of output: 908
696-732: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The new function
RunAdminDeleteUserTestis well-structured and includes necessary error handling.However, ensure that the function is correctly integrated and used within the codebase.
Verification successful
The function
RunAdminDeleteUserTestis correctly integrated and used within the codebase.
- The function is utilized in
server/rpc/server_test.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the function usage of `RunAdminDeleteUserTest` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Appropriate integration and usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'RunAdminDeleteUserTest'Length of output: 859
641-661: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The renaming from
RunAdminSignUpTesttoRunAdminCreateUserTestand the update fromSignUptoCreateUserare appropriate.However, ensure that all function calls to
RunAdminCreateUserTestmatch the new name and method call.Verification successful
Verification successful!
The function
RunAdminCreateUserTestis correctly used in the codebase with the new name and method call.
server/rpc/server_test.gotest/sharding/server_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RunAdminCreateUserTest` match the new name and method call. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name and method call. rg --type go -A 5 $'RunAdminCreateUserTest'Length of output: 1181
Tools
GitHub Check: build
[failure] 647-647:
string123!has 3 occurrences, make it a constant (goconst)server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (1)
660-673: Enhance error handling and logging.Consider adding more specific error messages and logging for better traceability.
updateResult, err := c.collection(ColUsers).UpdateOne(ctx, bson.M{"username": username}, bson.M{"$set": bson.M{"hashed_password": hashedNewPassword}}, ) if err != nil { + logging.DefaultLogger().Errorf("Failed to update password for user: %s, error: %v", username, err) return fmt.Errorf("failed to update password for user %s: %w", username, err) } if updateResult.ModifiedCount == 0 { + logging.DefaultLogger().Warnf("No user found to update password with username: %s", username) return fmt.Errorf("no user found with username %s", username) } +logging.DefaultLogger().Infof("Password updated for user: %s", username) return nilLikely invalid or redundant comment.
api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (2)
183-183: Deprecation notice is clear and correctly references the new functionality.The deprecation notice for the
SignUpendpoint is clear and correctly references theCreateUserfunctionality.
726-729: Confirm ifChangeUserPasswordResponseis intended to be empty.The schema has no properties. If no properties are needed, this should be explicitly stated.
- description: "" + description: "Response schema for ChangeUserPassword. No properties are needed."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (2 hunks)
- test/helper/helper.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
test/helper/helper.go (1)
67-67: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new variable.The new variable
AdminPasswordForCreateUseris defined correctly. Ensure that it is used appropriately in the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! The new variable
AdminPasswordForCreateUseris used appropriately in the codebase.The variable is used in the functions
RunAdminCreateUserTest,RunAdminDeleteUserTest, andRunAdminChangePasswordTestfor setting theadminPasswordin user creation tests.
server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go: Lines whereAdminPasswordForCreateUseris used.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new variable `AdminPasswordForCreateUser`. # Test: Search for the usage of the new variable. Expect: Appropriate usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'AdminPasswordForCreateUser'Length of output: 385
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the relevant lines from `server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go` to review the context of the usage of `AdminPasswordForCreateUser`. # Extract 5 lines before and after each occurrence of `AdminPasswordForCreateUser` for context. rg --type go 'AdminPasswordForCreateUser' -A 5 -B 5 server/rpc/testcases/testcases.goLength of output: 1046
server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (3)
641-661: LGTM! The renaming and method call update are appropriate.The function
RunAdminSignUpTesthas been correctly renamed toRunAdminCreateUserTest, and the internal method call has been updated fromSignUptoCreateUser.
696-731: LGTM! The new test function is comprehensive.The function
RunAdminDeleteUserTestcorrectly tests the deletion of a user and ensures appropriate error handling for non-existent users.
734-801: LGTM! The new test function is comprehensive.The function
RunAdminChangePasswordTestcorrectly tests the password change process and ensures appropriate error handling for invalid operations.
|
@krapie hello. I agree with all of your suggestions in the comments, so I've made the following changes.
In addition, I also included the review. Thank you for your careful review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now I'm a bit confused by the word RunAdminCreateUserTest. Does this mean admin can create other user or create itself(admin)? RunAdminSignUpTest makes more sense in terms of creating itself(admin).
Sorry, but I think we should reconsider which word to use. Using the word User may confuse others between admin creating user(not admin), or creating itself(admin).
Any ideas? @hackerwins
|
Also, I did not get what below comment means:
|
@krapie Anyway, that means, what it means is that I want to refactor the duplicated validation strings like type SignupFields struct {
// Username is the name of user.
Username *string `bson:"username" validate:"required,min=2,max=30,slug"`
// Password is the password of user.
Password *string `bson:"password" validate:"required,min=8,max=30,alpha_num_special"`
}
type ChangePasswordFields struct {
// Username is the name of user.
Username *string `bson:"username" validate:"required,min=2,max=30,slug"`
// NewPassword is the new password of user
NewPassword *string `bson:"new_password" validate:"required,min=8,max=30,alpha_num_special"`
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- server/backend/database/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- server/backend/database/database.go
- server/backend/database/mongo/client.go
|
@gusah009 How about changing the word It will look something like below: service AdminService {
rpc LogIn(LogInRequest) returns (LogInResponse) {}
rpc CreateAccount(CreateAccountRequest) returns (CreateAccountResponse) {}
rpc DeleteAccount(DeleteAccountRequest) returns (DeleteAccountResponse) {}
rpc ChangePassword(ChangePasswordRequest) returns (ChangePasswordResponse) {}
} |
|
@krapie Oh, that's a good idea. I'll do it right away. Well, then I'll change the |
|
@gusah009 Hmm. I'm not sure about changing
|
@krapie Looking at it like this, I don’t think I need to change the username. Thank you for your good advice. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
test/integration/account_test.go (1)
43-49: Ensure consistency by removing deprecatedSignUpreferencesThe transition to using
CreateAccountis incomplete. There are still several references to the deprecatedSignUpmethod that need to be addressed:
server/rpc/admin_server.go: Function definition and comments.server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go: Interceptor checks.api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.go: Protobuf message types and descriptors.api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go: RPC handlers and client definitions.Please update these references to ensure consistency throughout the codebase.
Analysis chain
LGTM! Updating the method calls enhances clarity.
The changes to use
CreateAccountinstead ofSignUpalign with the new terminology and improve the readability of the test cases.However, ensure that all method calls to
CreateAccountare consistent throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `CreateAccount` are consistent throughout the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new method name. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateAccount'Length of output: 25657
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are any remaining calls to the deprecated `SignUp` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the deprecated method usage. Expect: No occurrences of the old method name. rg --type go -A 5 $'SignUp'Length of output: 16168
server/accounts/accounts.go (1)
Line range hint
55-68: Add validation forusernameandpassword.The function should validate the
usernameandpasswordparameters before proceeding with the password check. This will ensure that the input data meets the required criteria and prevent potential issues with invalid data.+ if err := validateUsername(username); err != nil { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid username: %w", err) + } + if err := validatePassword(password); err != nil { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid password: %w", err) + }server/backend/database/database.go (2)
130-131: Action Required: Update references toFindUserInfoByIDin test cases.The method
FindAccountInfoByIDhas been correctly updated, but some test cases still refer to the old method nameFindUserInfoByID. These references need to be updated to ensure consistency and validity of the tests.
server/backend/database/testcases/testcases.goserver/backend/database/mongo/client_test.goserver/backend/database/memory/database_test.go#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify all instances of `FindUserInfoByID` in the codebase, focusing on test files. # Test: Search for the old method name in test files. rg --type go 'FindUserInfoByID'Analysis chain
Change Approved: Updated method to
FindAccountInfoByID.The method name and return type changes align with the shift to account-centric terminology.
Verify that all calls to this method have been updated to match the new signature.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `FindAccountInfoByID` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'FindAccountInfoByID'Length of output: 4002
133-137: Outdated Test Function Names: Update RequiredThe test functions still use the old names
RunFindUserInfoByNameTestandRunListUserInfosTest. Please update these test function names to reflect the new method names to maintain consistency.
server/backend/database/memory/database_test.go: UpdateRunFindUserInfoByNameTesttoRunFindAccountInfoByNameTest.server/backend/database/memory/database_test.go: UpdateRunListUserInfosTesttoRunListAccountInfosTest.server/backend/database/testcases/testcases.go: UpdateRunFindUserInfoByNameTesttoRunFindAccountInfoByNameTest.server/backend/database/testcases/testcases.go: UpdateRunListUserInfosTesttoRunListAccountInfosTest.server/backend/database/mongo/client_test.go: UpdateRunFindUserInfoByNameTesttoRunFindAccountInfoByNameTest.server/backend/database/mongo/client_test.go: UpdateRunListUserInfosTesttoRunListAccountInfosTest.test/sharding/mongo_client_test.go: UpdateRunListUserInfosTesttoRunListAccountInfosTest.Analysis chain
Change Approved: Updated methods to
FindAccountInfoByNameandListAccountInfos.The method names and return type changes align with the shift to account-centric terminology.
Verify that all calls to these methods have been updated to match the new signatures.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `FindAccountInfoByName` and `ListAccountInfos` match the new signatures. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signatures. rg --type go -A 5 $'FindAccountInfoByName' rg --type go -A 5 $'ListAccountInfos'Length of output: 8444
server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (1)
Line range hint
123-154:
Update error message to reflect account-centric model.The error message "upsert default user info" should be updated to "upsert default account info" for consistency.
if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("upsert default user info: %w", err) }should be:
if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("upsert default account info: %w", err) }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.goapi/yorkie/v1/resources.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (36)
- admin/client.go (1 hunks)
- api/converter/from_pb.go (1 hunks)
- api/converter/to_pb.go (1 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (12 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml (2 hunks)
- api/types/account.go (1 hunks)
- api/types/account_fields.go (1 hunks)
- api/types/account_fields_test.go (1 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (5 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/resources.proto (1 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (9 hunks)
- cmd/yorkie/login.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/yorkie/server.go (1 hunks)
- design/presence.md (2 hunks)
- pkg/index/tree.go (1 hunks)
- server/accounts/accounts.go (4 hunks)
- server/accounts/context.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/backend.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/account_info.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/client_info.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/database.go (3 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go (3 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/database_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/indexes.go (2 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (5 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/client_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/indexes.go (3 hunks)
- server/backend/database/testcases/testcases.go (2 hunks)
- server/rpc/admin_server.go (16 hunks)
- server/rpc/connecthelper/status.go (2 hunks)
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (6 hunks)
- server/rpc/server_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (2 hunks)
- test/helper/helper.go (1 hunks)
- test/integration/account_test.go (1 hunks)
- test/sharding/mongo_client_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- cmd/yorkie/login.go
- cmd/yorkie/server.go
- design/presence.md
- pkg/index/tree.go
- server/backend/database/memory/database_test.go
- test/sharding/mongo_client_test.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- admin/client.go
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go
- server/rpc/server_test.go
- server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go
- test/helper/helper.go
Additional comments not posted (74)
api/types/account.go (1)
22-23: LGTM! RenamingUsertoAccountis consistent with the new functionality.The renaming aligns with the broader scope of the struct.
server/accounts/context.go (4)
17-17: LGTM! Changing the package name toaccountsaligns with the new functionality.The package name change is consistent with the shift to account-centric operations.
25-26: LGTM! RenaminguserKeytoaccountKeyis consistent with the new functionality.The renaming aligns with the broader scope of the key type.
29-30: LGTM! Updating the function signature to handle*types.Accountis consistent with the new functionality.The function correctly retrieves an
*types.Accountfrom the context.
34-35: LGTM! Updating the function signature to handle*types.Accountis consistent with the new functionality.The function correctly sets an
*types.Accountinto the context.api/types/account_fields.go (4)
24-25: LGTM! RenamingSignupFieldstoAccountFieldsis consistent with the new functionality.The renaming aligns with the broader scope of the struct.
26-26: LGTM! The updated comment accurately reflects the purpose of theUsernamefield.The comment is consistent with the new struct name.
29-29: LGTM! The updated comment accurately reflects the purpose of thePasswordfield.The comment is consistent with the new struct name.
33-34: LGTM! Updating the method to operate onAccountFieldsis consistent with the new functionality.The method correctly validates the
AccountFieldsstruct.test/integration/account_test.go (2)
31-31: LGTM! Renaming the test function enhances clarity.The renaming of
TestUsertoTestAccountaligns with the new terminology and improves the readability of the test suite.
35-35: LGTM! Renaming the test case enhances clarity.The renaming of the test case to "account test" aligns with the new terminology and improves the readability of the test suite.
api/types/account_fields_test.go (2)
41-83: LGTM! Updating the struct name enhances clarity.The changes to use
AccountFieldsinstead ofSignupFieldsalign with the new terminology and improve the readability of the test cases.
34-34: LGTM! Updating the struct name enhances clarity.The changes to use
AccountFieldsinstead ofSignupFieldsalign with the new terminology and improve the readability of the test cases.However, ensure that all struct usages of
AccountFieldsare consistent throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful. The struct
AccountFieldsis used consistently throughout the codebase.
server/rpc/admin_server.goapi/types/account_fields.goapi/types/account_fields_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all struct usages of `AccountFields` are consistent throughout the codebase. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new struct name. rg --type go -A 5 $'AccountFields'Length of output: 4824
server/backend/database/account_info.go (4)
33-34: LGTM! Renaming the struct enhances clarity.The changes to use
AccountInfoinstead ofUserInfoalign with the new terminology and improve the readability of the code.
41-43: LGTM! Renaming the function enhances clarity.The changes to use
NewAccountInfoinstead ofNewUserInfoalign with the new terminology and improve the readability of the code.
50-56: LGTM! Updating the function enhances clarity.The changes to use
DeepCopyforAccountInfoinstead ofUserInfoalign with the new terminology and improve the readability of the code.
64-66: LGTM! Renaming the function enhances clarity.The changes to use
ToAccountinstead ofToUseralign with the new terminology and improve the readability of the code.However, ensure that all method calls to
ToAccountare consistent throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Method
ToAccountusage is consistent across the codebase.The
ToAccountmethod is used correctly in all relevant places, and the deprecatedToUsermethod is appropriately marked. No further action is needed.
server/accounts/accounts.goserver/rpc/admin_server.goapi/converter/to_pb.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `ToAccount` are consistent throughout the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new method name. rg --type go -A 5 $'ToAccount'Length of output: 2787
server/accounts/accounts.go (1)
86-96: LGTM!The function
GetAccountByIDlooks good and is correctly implemented.server/backend/database/mongo/indexes.go (3)
31-32: LGTM!The constant
ColAccountsis correctly renamed and aligns with the new account-centric model.
48-48: LGTM!The
Collectionsvariable is correctly updated to includeColAccountsinstead ofColUsers.
80-80: LGTM!The
collectionInfosstructure is correctly updated to includeColAccountsinstead ofColUsers.api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (8)
29-29: Ensure clients are notified about the deprecation ofSignUp.The
SignUpRPC is marked as deprecated and will be replaced byCreateAccount. Ensure that clients using this RPC are aware of the deprecation and have a migration path.
31-31: LGTM! TheCreateAccountRPC is a good addition.The introduction of the
CreateAccountRPC aligns with the goal of enhancing account management.
33-34: LGTM! TheDeleteAccountandChangeAccountPasswordRPCs are essential additions.The introduction of the
DeleteAccountandChangeAccountPasswordRPCs enhances the functionality of the AdminService.
60-63: LGTM! TheCreateAccountRequestmessage is well-defined.The
CreateAccountRequestmessage includes the necessary fields for account creation.
65-67: LGTM! TheCreateAccountResponsemessage is well-defined.The
CreateAccountResponsemessage includes the necessary field for the account creation response.
78-81: LGTM! TheDeleteAccountRequestmessage is well-defined.The
DeleteAccountRequestmessage includes the necessary fields for account deletion.
86-90: LGTM! TheChangeAccountPasswordRequestmessage is well-defined.The
ChangeAccountPasswordRequestmessage includes the necessary fields for changing account passwords.
92-93: LGTM! TheChangeAccountPasswordResponsemessage is appropriate.The
ChangeAccountPasswordResponsemessage serves as a simple acknowledgment of the password change operation.server/backend/backend.go (1)
125-125: Verify the existence and implementation ofEnsureDefaultAccountAndProject.The function call is changed from
EnsureDefaultUserAndProjecttoEnsureDefaultAccountAndProject. Ensure that the renamed function exists and is correctly implemented.Verification successful
The function
EnsureDefaultAccountAndProjectexists and is implemented correctly.The function
EnsureDefaultAccountAndProjectis referenced and implemented in multiple files, including:
server/backend/database/mongo/client.goserver/backend/database/memory/database.goThe renaming from
EnsureDefaultUserAndProjecttoEnsureDefaultAccountAndProjectis consistent with the shift in terminology from "User" to "Account".Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and implementation of `EnsureDefaultAccountAndProject`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: The function should be implemented correctly. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func EnsureDefaultAccountAndProject($_, $_, $_, $_) ($_, $_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and implementation of `EnsureDefaultAccountAndProject`. # Test: Search for the function implementation without specifying parameters. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func EnsureDefaultAccountAndProject($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to `EnsureDefaultAccountAndProject` in the codebase. # Test: Search for any references to the function name. rg 'EnsureDefaultAccountAndProject'Length of output: 1203
server/backend/database/memory/indexes.go (1)
23-23: Verify that all references totblUsersare updated totblAccounts.The variable
tblUsersis renamed totblAccounts. Ensure that all references to the old variable name are updated.Verification successful
All references to
tblUsershave been successfully updated totblAccounts.The search results confirm that
tblAccountsis used consistently across the codebase.
server/backend/database/memory/indexes.goserver/backend/database/memory/database.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all references to `tblUsers` are updated to `tblAccounts`. # Test: Search for the old variable name. Expect: No occurrences of `tblUsers`. rg --type go 'tblUsers'Length of output: 23
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `tblAccounts` is used in place of `tblUsers`. # Test: Search for the new variable name. Expect: Occurrences of `tblAccounts`. rg --type go 'tblAccounts'Length of output: 1309
server/backend/database/client_info.go (1)
70-70: Comment update approved.The change in the comment for the
Keyfield from "users" to "accounts" aligns with the updated terminology.server/rpc/connecthelper/status.go (4)
56-56: Addition ofdatabase.ErrAccountNotFoundapproved.The addition of
database.ErrAccountNotFoundto theerrorToConnectCodemap with aconnect.CodeNotFoundstatus is consistent with the updated terminology.
61-61: Addition ofdatabase.ErrAccountAlreadyExistsapproved.The addition of
database.ErrAccountAlreadyExiststo theerrorToConnectCodemap with aconnect.CodeAlreadyExistsstatus is consistent with the updated terminology.
107-107: Addition ofdatabase.ErrAccountNotFoundapproved.The addition of
database.ErrAccountNotFoundto theerrorToCodemap with a string representation of "ErrAccountNotFound" is consistent with the updated terminology.
111-111: Addition ofdatabase.ErrAccountAlreadyExistsapproved.The addition of
database.ErrAccountAlreadyExiststo theerrorToCodemap with a string representation of "ErrAccountAlreadyExists" is consistent with the updated terminology.api/yorkie/v1/resources.proto (2)
274-274: Deprecation comment forUserapproved.The deprecation comment for the
Usermessage is clear and indicates the transition to theAccountmessage.
281-285: NewAccountmessage definition approved.The
Accountmessage mirrors the structure of the deprecatedUsermessage and aligns with the updated terminology.server/backend/database/database.go (6)
35-36: Change Approved: Updated error message toErrAccountNotFound.The change aligns with the shift from user-centric to account-centric terminology.
41-42: Change Approved: Updated error message toErrAccountAlreadyExists.The change aligns with the shift from user-centric to account-centric terminology.
117-122: Change Approved: Updated method toCreateAccountInfo.The method name and return type changes align with the shift to account-centric terminology.
Verify that all calls to this method have been updated to match the new signature.
Verification successful
Change Approved: Updated method to
CreateAccountInfo.The method name and return type changes align with the shift to account-centric terminology. All instances of
CreateAccountInfoin the codebase have been updated to match the new signature.
server/accounts/accounts.goserver/backend/database/testcases/testcases.goserver/backend/database/mongo/client.goserver/backend/database/memory/database.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CreateAccountInfo` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateAccountInfo'Length of output: 2581
124-125: Change Approved: Introduced methodDeleteAccountInfoByName.The method aligns with the new account management functionalities.
Verify that the method is used correctly in the codebase.
Verification successful
Change Approved: Introduced method
DeleteAccountInfoByName.The method aligns with the new account management functionalities and is used correctly and consistently across the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `DeleteAccountInfoByName` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Correct and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'DeleteAccountInfoByName'Length of output: 2011
127-128: Change Approved: Introduced methodChangeAccountPassword.The method aligns with the new account management functionalities.
Verify that the method is used correctly in the codebase.
Verification successful
Change Approved: Introduced method
ChangeAccountPassword.The method aligns with the new account management functionalities and is consistently used across the codebase.
server/rpc/testcases/testcases.goserver/rpc/interceptors/admin.goserver/accounts/accounts.goserver/rpc/admin_server.goserver/backend/database/database.goserver/backend/database/memory/database.goserver/backend/database/mongo/client.goapi/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.goapi/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `ChangeAccountPassword` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Correct and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'ChangeAccountPassword'Length of output: 21116
89-96: Change Approved: Updated method toEnsureDefaultAccountAndProject.The method name and return type changes align with the shift to account-centric terminology.
Verify that all calls to this method have been updated to match the new signature.
server/rpc/admin_server.go (4)
53-73: Deprecation Notice Approved:SignUpmethod.The
SignUpmethod is deprecated and will be replaced byCreateAccount. The notice is clear, and the method remains functional.
143-169: Change Approved: Introduced methodChangeAccountPassword.The method validates the new password fields and calls
accounts.ChangeAccountPassword. Ensure the validation and password change logic are correct.Verify that the method is used correctly in the codebase.
Verification successful
Change Approved: Introduced method
ChangeAccountPassword.The method validates the new password fields and calls
accounts.ChangeAccountPassword. The method is used correctly and consistently in the codebase.
- Verified usage in
server/rpc/admin_server.go,server/rpc/server_test.go,server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go,server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go,server/accounts/accounts.go,server/backend/database/database.go,server/backend/database/memory/database.go,server/backend/database/mongo/client.go,api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.go, andapi/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `ChangeAccountPassword` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Correct and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'ChangeAccountPassword'Length of output: 21116
120-141: Change Approved: Introduced methodDeleteAccount.The method validates the user's password and calls
accounts.DeleteAccountByName. Ensure the validation and account deletion logic are correct.Verify that the method is used correctly in the codebase.
Verification successful
Verification Successful: Method
DeleteAccountis used correctly in the codebase.The method
DeleteAccountis properly implemented and tested across various files:
server/rpc/testcases/testcases.goserver/rpc/server_test.goapi/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `DeleteAccount` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Correct and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'DeleteAccount'Length of output: 20237
75-91: Change Approved: Introduced methodCreateAccount.The method validates account fields and calls
accounts.CreateAccount. Ensure the validation and account creation logic are correct.Verify that the method is used correctly in the codebase.
Verification successful
Change Approved: Introduced method
CreateAccount.The method validates account fields and calls
accounts.CreateAccount. The usage of theCreateAccountmethod is consistent and correct across the codebase.
- Verified in test/integration/account_test.go
- Verified in server/rpc/admin_server.go
- Verified in server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go
- Verified in api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `CreateAccount` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Correct and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateAccount'Length of output: 25657
api/converter/to_pb.go (2)
36-43: Deprecation Notice Approved:ToUserfunction.The
ToUserfunction is deprecated and will be replaced byToAccount. The notice is clear, and the function remains functional.
45-50: Change Approved: Introduced functionToAccount.The function converts a
*types.Accountto anapi.Account, mirroring the implementation of the deprecatedToUserfunction.Verify that the function is used correctly in the codebase.
Verification successful
Change Approved: Introduced function
ToAccount.The function converts a
*types.Accountto anapi.Account, mirroring the implementation of the deprecatedToUserfunction. The function is used correctly in the codebase.
server/accounts/accounts.go: Used to return the result ofToAccount().server/rpc/admin_server.go: Used to assign the result to a field in a struct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `ToAccount` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'ToAccount'Length of output: 2787
api/converter/from_pb.go (1)
32-37: LGTM!The function
FromAccountcorrectly maps fields from the ProtobufAccountmessage to thetypes.Accountmodel.api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (6)
53-55: LGTM!The
AdminServiceCreateAccountProcedureis correctly defined and consistent with other procedure names.
58-60: LGTM!The
AdminServiceDeleteAccountProcedureis correctly defined and consistent with other procedure names.
61-63: LGTM!The
AdminServiceChangeAccountPasswordProcedureis correctly defined and consistent with other procedure names.
100-105: LGTM!The methods
CreateAccount,DeleteAccount, andChangeAccountPasswordare correctly defined and consistent with other methods in theAdminServiceClientinterface.
134-153: LGTM!The fields for
createAccount,deleteAccount, andchangeAccountPasswordRPC methods are correctly defined and consistent with other fields in theadminServiceClientstruct.
314-319: LGTM!The methods
CreateAccount,DeleteAccount, andChangeAccountPasswordare correctly defined and consistent with other methods in theAdminServiceHandlerinterface.server/backend/database/memory/database.go (8)
Line range hint
134-144: LGTM!The function
EnsureDefaultAccountAndProjectcorrectly reflects the shift from user management to account management, and the return types are correctly updated.
159-180: LGTM!The function
ensureDefaultAccountInfocorrectly reflects the shift from user management to account management, and the database table is correctly updated.
405-425: LGTM!The function
DeleteAccountInfoByNamecorrectly handles the deletion of an account by name, and error handling is properly implemented.
427-449: LGTM!The function
ChangeAccountPasswordcorrectly handles the password change, and error handling is properly implemented.
378-397: LGTM!The function
CreateAccountInfocorrectly reflects the shift from user management to account management.
451-464: LGTM!The function
FindAccountInfoByIDcorrectly reflects the shift from user management to account management.
467-480: LGTM!The function
FindAccountInfoByNamecorrectly reflects the shift from user management to account management.
483-499: LGTM!The function
ListAccountInfoscorrectly reflects the shift from user management to account management.server/backend/database/testcases/testcases.go (7)
172-172: LGTM!The change from
EnsureDefaultUserAndProjecttoEnsureDefaultAccountAndProjectis consistent with the new terminology.
371-385: LGTM!The changes from
RunListUserInfosTesttoRunListAccountInfosTestand the renaming of user-related terms to account-related terms are consistent with the new terminology.
392-403: LGTM!The changes from
RunFindUserInfoByIDTesttoRunFindAccountInfoByIDTestand the renaming of user-related terms to account-related terms are consistent with the new terminology.
410-421: LGTM!The changes from
RunFindUserInfoByNameTesttoRunFindAccountInfoByNameTestand the renaming of user-related terms to account-related terms are consistent with the new terminology.
371-385: LGTM!The changes from
RunListUserInfosTesttoRunListAccountInfosTestand the renaming of user-related terms to account-related terms are consistent with the new terminology.
392-403: LGTM!The changes from
RunFindUserInfoByIDTesttoRunFindAccountInfoByIDTestand the renaming of user-related terms to account-related terms are consistent with the new terminology.
410-421: LGTM!The changes from
RunFindUserInfoByNameTesttoRunFindAccountInfoByNameTestand the renaming of user-related terms to account-related terms are consistent with the new terminology.api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml (2)
161-181: LGTM!The addition of the
yorkie.v1.Accountschema with propertiescreatedAt,id, andusernameis well-defined and aligns with the new terminology.
1687-1687: LGTM!The deprecation of the
yorkie.v1.Userschema is consistent with the shift to the newAccountschema.
gusah009
force-pushed
the
support-basic-account-action-for-admin
branch
from
e06f7f9 to
acaf851
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (1)
Line range hint
123-155: RenameinfotoaccountInfoand update error message.The variable
infoshould be renamed toaccountInfoto align with the new account-centric model. The error message should be updated to reflect the account-centric model.- info := database.AccountInfo{} - if err := result.Decode(&info); err != nil { + accountInfo := database.AccountInfo{} + if err := result.Decode(&accountInfo); err != nil { if err == mongo.ErrNoDocuments { - return nil, fmt.Errorf("default: %w", database.ErrAccountNotFound) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("default account: %w", database.ErrAccountNotFound) } - return nil, fmt.Errorf("decode user info: %w", err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("decode account info: %w", err) } - return &info, nil + return &accountInfo, nil
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.goapi/yorkie/v1/resources.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (39)
- admin/client.go (1 hunks)
- api/converter/from_pb.go (1 hunks)
- api/converter/to_pb.go (1 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (12 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml (2 hunks)
- api/types/account.go (1 hunks)
- api/types/account_fields.go (1 hunks)
- api/types/account_fields_test.go (1 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (5 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/resources.proto (1 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (9 hunks)
- cmd/yorkie/login.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/yorkie/server.go (2 hunks)
- design/presence.md (2 hunks)
- pkg/index/tree.go (1 hunks)
- server/accounts/accounts.go (4 hunks)
- server/accounts/context.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/backend.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/config.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/account_info.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/client_info.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/database.go (3 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go (3 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/database_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/indexes.go (2 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (5 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/client_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/indexes.go (3 hunks)
- server/backend/database/testcases/testcases.go (2 hunks)
- server/config.go (2 hunks)
- server/rpc/admin_server.go (16 hunks)
- server/rpc/connecthelper/status.go (2 hunks)
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (6 hunks)
- server/rpc/server_test.go (2 hunks)
- server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (10 hunks)
- test/helper/helper.go (3 hunks)
- test/integration/account_test.go (1 hunks)
- test/sharding/mongo_client_test.go (1 hunks)
- test/sharding/server_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- design/presence.md
- server/backend/config.go
- server/backend/database/client_info.go
- server/config.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (25)
- admin/client.go
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml
- api/types/account.go
- api/types/account_fields.go
- api/types/account_fields_test.go
- api/yorkie/v1/resources.proto
- api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go
- cmd/yorkie/login.go
- cmd/yorkie/server.go
- pkg/index/tree.go
- server/accounts/accounts.go
- server/backend/backend.go
- server/backend/database/account_info.go
- server/backend/database/database.go
- server/backend/database/memory/database_test.go
- server/backend/database/memory/indexes.go
- server/rpc/admin_server.go
- server/rpc/connecthelper/status.go
- server/rpc/server_test.go
- server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go
- test/helper/helper.go
- test/integration/account_test.go
- test/sharding/mongo_client_test.go
- test/sharding/server_test.go
Additional comments not posted (36)
server/accounts/context.go (3)
17-17: LGTM!The package name change from
userstoaccountsaligns with the new account-centric model.
25-26: LGTM!The type name change from
userKeytoaccountKeyaligns with the new account-centric model.
29-35: LGTM!The function signature changes from handling
*types.Userto*types.Accountare consistent with the new account-centric model. The context handling appears correct.server/backend/database/mongo/client_test.go (3)
83-85: LGTM!The test case name change from
ListUserInfostoListAccountInfosaligns with the new account-centric model.
88-89: LGTM!The test case name change from
FindUserInfoByIDtoFindAccountInfoByIDaligns with the new account-centric model.
92-92: Update the test function name for consistency.The test function name should be updated to reflect the new account-centric model.
- testcases.RunFindUserInfoByNameTest(t, cli) + testcases.RunFindAccountInfoByNameTest(t, cli)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
server/backend/database/mongo/indexes.go (3)
31-32: LGTM!The collection name change from
ColUserstoColAccountsaligns with the new account-centric model.
48-48: LGTM!The update to replace
ColUserswithColAccountsin theCollectionsvariable aligns with the new account-centric model.
Line range hint
80-85:
LGTM!The update to replace
ColUserswithColAccountsin thecollectionInfosstructure aligns with the new account-centric model.api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (5)
29-31: LGTM! Deprecation and replacement of SignUp RPC.The SignUp RPC is correctly marked as deprecated and replaced by the CreateAccount RPC.
33-34: LGTM! Addition of DeleteAccount and ChangeAccountPassword RPCs.The new RPCs for DeleteAccount and ChangeAccountPassword are correctly defined.
60-63: LGTM! Addition of CreateAccountRequest message.The CreateAccountRequest message is correctly defined with
usernameandpasswordfields.
78-81: LGTM! Addition of DeleteAccountRequest message.The DeleteAccountRequest message is correctly defined with
usernameandpasswordfields.
86-90: LGTM! Addition of ChangeAccountPasswordRequest message.The ChangeAccountPasswordRequest message is correctly defined with
username,current_password, andnew_passwordfields.server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (4)
167-167: LGTM! Updated context management inbuildContext.The context management is correctly updated to use
accountsinstead ofusers.
Line range hint
179-201:
LGTM! Updatedauthenticatefunction to useaccounts.The
authenticatefunction is correctly updated to useaccountsinstead ofusers.
201-204: LGTM! Updatedauthenticatefunction to useaccountsfor project owner.The
authenticatefunction is correctly updated to useaccountsinstead ofusersfor the project owner.
45-48: Verify the security implications of the updatedisRequiredAuthfunction.The updated
isRequiredAuthfunction now includes additional methods that do not require authentication. Ensure this change does not introduce security vulnerabilities.api/converter/to_pb.go (2)
36-43: LGTM! Deprecation and update ofToUserfunction.The
ToUserfunction is correctly deprecated and updated to useaccountinstead ofuser.
45-50: LGTM! Addition ofToAccountfunction.The
ToAccountfunction is correctly defined to convert a*types.Accountto anapi.Account.api/converter/from_pb.go (1)
32-37: LGTM!The function correctly converts the Protobuf
Accountobject to thetypes.Accountobject. The changes reflect the shift from user-centric to account-centric data handling.server/backend/database/memory/database.go (9)
134-140: LGTM!The function correctly ensures the creation of default account and project. The changes reflect the shift from user-centric to account-centric data handling.
159-180: LGTM!The function correctly ensures the creation of the default account. The changes reflect the shift from user-centric to account-centric data handling.
378-397: LGTM!The function correctly creates a new account. The changes reflect the shift from user-centric to account-centric data handling.
405-425: LGTM!The function correctly deletes an account by name. It follows a similar transaction pattern as the previous user functions.
427-448: LGTM!The function correctly changes the password for an account. It follows a similar transaction pattern as the previous user functions.
451-464: LGTM!The function correctly finds an account by the given ID. The changes reflect the shift from user-centric to account-centric data handling.
467-480: LGTM!The function correctly finds an account by the given username. The changes reflect the shift from user-centric to account-centric data handling.
483-499: LGTM!The function correctly lists all accounts. The changes reflect the shift from user-centric to account-centric data handling.
134-140: LGTM!The function correctly ensures the creation of default account and project. The changes reflect the shift from user-centric to account-centric data handling.
server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (2)
Line range hint
504-549: LGTM!The function
ActivateClientis correctly implemented and does not require any changes.
Line range hint
550-606: LGTM!The function
DeactivateClientis correctly implemented and does not require any changes.server/backend/database/testcases/testcases.go (4)
392-403: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
RunFindAccountInfoByIDTestmatch the new signature.Verification successful
Verified: All function calls to
RunFindAccountInfoByIDTestmatch the new signature.The function
RunFindAccountInfoByIDTestis correctly used in the codebase with the updated signature.
server/backend/database/mongo/client_test.goserver/backend/database/memory/database_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RunFindAccountInfoByIDTest` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'RunFindAccountInfoByIDTest'Length of output: 1571
172-172: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
EnsureDefaultAccountAndProjectmatch the new signature.Verification successful
Verification successful: Function usage matches the new signature.
The function
EnsureDefaultAccountAndProjectis consistently used with the new signature across the codebase.
server/backend/backend.goserver/backend/database/database.goserver/backend/database/memory/database.goserver/backend/database/mongo/client.goserver/backend/database/testcases/testcases.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `EnsureDefaultAccountAndProject` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'EnsureDefaultAccountAndProject'Length of output: 3580
410-421: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
RunFindAccountInfoByNameTestmatch the new signature.
371-385: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
RunListAccountInfosTestmatch the new signature.Verification successful
Function usage verified successfully.
All instances of
RunListAccountInfosTestmatch the new function signature and are used correctly.
test/sharding/mongo_client_test.goserver/backend/database/memory/database_test.goserver/backend/database/mongo/client_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RunListAccountInfosTest` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'RunListAccountInfosTest'Length of output: 1899
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the function calls to `RunListAccountInfosTest` in the listed files. # Check `test/sharding/mongo_client_test.go` rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'RunListAccountInfosTest' test/sharding/mongo_client_test.go # Check `server/backend/database/memory/database_test.go` rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'RunListAccountInfosTest' server/backend/database/memory/database_test.go # Check `server/backend/database/mongo/client_test.go` rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'RunListAccountInfosTest' server/backend/database/mongo/client_test.goLength of output: 1288
renamed the signup_fields file that does the validation to user_fields to equalize the validation for the user, and I added ChangePasswordFields, with a comment saying that it should have the same validation as signup.
# Conflicts: # server/backend/database/database.go # server/backend/database/mongo/client.go
|
After discussing with @gusah009, we have concluded what we revert our changes to use RPC name as I apologize for the frequent change request to @gusah009. Thank you for your understanding. |
gusah009
force-pushed
the
support-basic-account-action-for-admin
branch
from
9ab1142 to
ddfdff5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
api/yorkie/v1/admin.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (16)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml (54 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml (64 hunks)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/yorkie.openapi.yaml (49 hunks)
- api/types/user_fields.go (1 hunks)
- api/types/user_fields_test.go (1 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto (2 hunks)
- api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go (9 hunks)
- server/backend/database/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go (1 hunks)
- server/backend/database/mongo/client.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/admin_server.go (2 hunks)
- server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/server_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go (2 hunks)
- server/users/users.go (1 hunks)
- test/helper/helper.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/resources.openapi.yaml
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/yorkie.openapi.yaml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- api/docs/yorkie/v1/admin.openapi.yaml
- api/types/user_fields.go
- api/types/user_fields_test.go
- api/yorkie/v1/admin.proto
- api/yorkie/v1/v1connect/admin.connect.go
- server/backend/database/database.go
- server/backend/database/memory/database.go
- server/backend/database/mongo/client.go
- server/rpc/server_test.go
- server/rpc/testcases/testcases.go
- server/users/users.go
- test/helper/helper.go
Additional comments not posted (5)
server/rpc/interceptors/admin.go (3)
45-47: Security Risk: Review the decision to bypass authentication for additional methods.Adding
ChangePasswordandDeleteAccountto the list of methods that do not require authentication could pose a security risk. Ensure that this decision is intentional and consider the potential implications.
Line range hint
66-66:
LGTM! Consistent with the shift to account-centric handling.The change from
users.Withtoaccounts.Withaligns with the transition to account-centric handling.
Line range hint
79-79:
LGTM! Consistent with the shift to account-centric handling.The changes from
users.GetUserByNametoaccounts.GetAccountByNameandusers.GetUserByIDtoaccounts.GetAccountByIDalign with the transition to account-centric handling.Also applies to: 85-85, 92-92
server/rpc/admin_server.go (2)
98-119: Enhance error handling and logging.Consider adding more specific error messages and logging for better traceability.
func (s *adminServer) DeleteAccount( ctx context.Context, req *connect.Request[api.DeleteAccountRequest], ) (*connect.Response[api.DeleteAccountResponse], error) { user, err := users.IsCorrectPassword( ctx, s.backend, req.Msg.Username, req.Msg.Password, ) if err != nil { logging.DefaultLogger().Errorf("Failed to validate password for user: %s, error: %v", req.Msg.Username, err) return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to validate password for user %s: %w", req.Msg.Username, err) } err = users.DeleteAccountByName(ctx, s.backend, user.Username) if err != nil { logging.DefaultLogger().Errorf("Failed to delete account for user: %s, error: %v", user.Username, err) return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to delete account for user %s: %w", user.Username, err) } logging.DefaultLogger().Infof("Account deleted for user: %s", user.Username) return connect.NewResponse(&api.DeleteAccountResponse{}), nil }
121-147: Enhance error handling and logging.Consider adding more specific error messages and logging for better traceability.
func (s *adminServer) ChangePassword( ctx context.Context, req *connect.Request[api.ChangePasswordRequest], ) (*connect.Response[api.ChangePasswordResponse], error) { fields := &types.UserFields{Username: &req.Msg.Username, Password: &req.Msg.NewPassword} if err := fields.Validate(); err != nil { logging.DefaultLogger().Errorf("Failed to validate new password for user: %s, error: %v", req.Msg.Username, err) return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to validate new password for user %s: %w", req.Msg.Username, err) } user, err := users.IsCorrectPassword( ctx, s.backend, req.Msg.Username, req.Msg.CurrentPassword, ) if err != nil { logging.DefaultLogger().Errorf("Failed to validate current password for user: %s, error: %v", req.Msg.Username, err) return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to validate current password for user %s: %w", req.Msg.Username, err) } err = users.ChangePassword(ctx, s.backend, user.Username, req.Msg.NewPassword) if err != nil { logging.DefaultLogger().Errorf("Failed to change password for user: %s, error: %v", user.Username, err) return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to change password for user %s: %w", user.Username, err) } logging.DefaultLogger().Infof("Password changed for user: %s", user.Username) return connect.NewResponse(&api.ChangePasswordResponse{}), nil }
gusah009
force-pushed
the
support-basic-account-action-for-admin
branch
from
ca0dc39 to
7022723
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #934 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 51.53% 51.31% -0.22%
==========================================
Files 71 71
Lines 10586 10679 +93
==========================================
+ Hits 5455 5480 +25
- Misses 4585 4650 +65
- Partials 546 549 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@hackerwins We did not consider cascading delete on user related objects including projects and documents. I think we need to also consider to also delete related resources. |
|
@krapie Please create an issue regarding this. 🙏 |
Add the admin APIs ChangePassword and DeleteAccount to enhance the functionality and provide basic account actions for administrators themselves.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Added the admin APIs ChangePassword and DeleteAccount.
As their names suggest, these are APIs for changing passwords and deleting accounts.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #849
Special notes for your reviewer:
I've verified that it works with mongoDB and in-memory DBs using postman.
As mentioned below, we will need to open an endpoint to access this API from your dashboard or CLI. client development is not included in this PR.
I generated the files with the
make protocommand, which broke the formatting of theapi/docs/yorkie/v1/*.openapi.yamlfiles.I wanted the validation of
usernameorpasswordonChangePasswordto be the same asSignUp, but I didn't know how to separate them into a common string, so I added a warning as a comment. If there's a good way to do it, I'd love to hear about it :)Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
There is no user impact yet. we need to open an endpoint that the client can access from the dashboard or CLI.
Additional documentation:
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation