Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fusion: Validate Unique Products double validation #2

Open
2 tasks done
BigRoy opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks done

Fusion: Validate Unique Products double validation #2

BigRoy opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition

Comments

@BigRoy
Copy link
Collaborator

BigRoy commented Apr 11, 2024

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues.

Please describe the feature you have in mind and explain what the current shortcomings are?

In Fusion, if two publish instances are set to the same folder and product name the validation report catches it. But it catches it twice:

image
image

This is due to there being one Fusion plug-in, and one global plug-in.

The fusion specific one does have "Select invalid" making it sligthly nicer so there is something to say about keeping that somehow - because I'm not sure how we could expose that in the global plug-in.

How would you imagine the implementation of the feature?

It should be reported once - not twice.

Are there any labels you wish to add?

  • I have added the relevant labels to the enhancement request.

Describe alternatives you've considered:

No response

Additional context:

No response

@BigRoy BigRoy transferred this issue from ynput/ayon-core Jul 2, 2024
@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 added the type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition label Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants