dbms: Fixed misspells in comments

[maiha]

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://yandex.ru/legal/cla/?lang=en

Category (leave one):

• Bug Fix

Short description (up to few sentences):

• Fixed misspells in comments and string literals under dbms.
• Replaced words by using sed commands as follows

Best regards,

s/\bcharater\b/character/g
s/\bchoosen\b/chosen/g
s/\bcomitted\b/committed/g
s/\bcompability\b/compatibility/g
s/\bconatin\b/contain/g
s/\bcongruental\b/congruential/g
s/\bcontinuouty\b/continuity/g
s/\bcorrellation\b/correlation/g
s/\bcoulld\b/could/g
s/\bdictionaeis\b/dictionaries/g
s/\bdisasterous\b/disastrous/g
s/\bdivisable\b/divisible/g
s/\bdo't\b/don't/g
s/\befficently\b/efficiently/g
s/\benogh\b/enough/g
s/\bexcecution\b/execution/g
s/\bexceeeds\b/exceeds/g
s/\bexeption\b/exception/g
s/\bexponentation\b/exponentiation/g
s/\bfolowing\b/following/g
s/\bfuntion\b/function/g
s/\bgemetric\b/geometric/g
s/\bgenreates\b/generates/g
s/\bimmediatly\b/immediately/g
s/\binitilaize\b/initialize/g
s/\bintializer\b/initializer/g
s/\blicence\b/license/g
s/\bminumum\b/minimum/g
s/\bmonotomic\b/monotonic/g
s/\boccasionaly\b/occasionally/g
s/\boccurences\b/occurrences/g
s/\bothervise\b/otherwise/g
s/\bpartiton\b/partition/g
s/\bprerpocessed\b/preprocessed/g
s/\bquailified\b/qualified/g
s/\brecieve\b/receive/g
s/\bretrurn\b/return/g
s/\bretured\b/returned/g
s/\bsclalar\b/scalar/g
s/\bsence\b/sense/g
s/\bseparatly\b/separately/g
s/\bsepated\b/separated/g
s/\bserialised\b/serialized/g
s/\bsucessfull\b/successful/g
s/\bsucessfuly\b/successfully/g
s/\bsuperflous\b/superfluous/g
s/\bsynonims\b/synonyms/g
s/\btranform\b/transform/g
s/\btransfering\b/transferring/g
s/\buntill\b/until/g

[alexey-milovidov]

Thank you!

I wonder did you perform manual proofread or have used some automated spell check to find notable mistakes?

[maiha]

@alexey-milovidov

1. detecting is automated by using aspell like this.

cat **/*.cpp | grep '///' | aspell -a | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | grep -v '*' | sort | uniq > typo.txt

2. proofread is manual. So it was limited to dbms for this time.

I'll try to check whole src when I have a time 😸

[alexey-milovidov]

A few notes:

• you can also search for header .h files (most of the comments are there);
• you can also look for multiline comments (we usually write them as

/** ...
  * ...
  */

)

I wonder if we can integrate spell check to our CI process. But there are too many exceptions (spell checker don't like gcc, LLVM, buf, etc.)