Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Loom support #288

Open
sistemd opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Loom support #288

sistemd opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@sistemd
Copy link

sistemd commented Nov 1, 2023

Would you accept a PR adding a loom feature to the crate, which swaps out std::sync with loom::sync? This would allow people who test their concurrent code with loom to also have loom control the scheduling of dashmap locks.

@xacrimon
Copy link
Owner

@sistemd I would yes. Gladly!

@shade
Copy link

shade commented Jun 22, 2024

@xacrimon Any issue with using shuttle instead of loom? We would get the same exhaustive testing that loom does but with the ability to use randomized testing if needed.

I am happy to write the PR :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants