Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Branches support for BitBucket #907

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 12, 2022
Merged

Conversation

qwerty287
Copy link
Contributor

Resolve two TODOs by loading branches from BitBucket servers.

@6543 6543 added forge/bitbucket bitbucket forge related enhancement improve existing features labels May 12, 2022
@6543 6543 enabled auto-merge (squash) May 12, 2022 17:10
@6543 6543 added this to the 1.0.0 milestone May 12, 2022
@6543 6543 merged commit be0dfb2 into woodpecker-ci:master May 12, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #907 (5d04eca) into master (6568751) will decrease coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #907      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   51.85%   51.70%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          80       80              
  Lines        6073     6090      +17     
==========================================
  Hits         3149     3149              
- Misses       2743     2759      +16     
- Partials      181      182       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
server/remote/bitbucket/bitbucket.go 90.14% <0.00%> (-4.45%) ⬇️
server/remote/bitbucketserver/bitbucketserver.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6568751...5d04eca. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement improve existing features forge/bitbucket bitbucket forge related
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants