Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

review discovery metadata and search standards #10

Closed
tomkralidis opened this issue May 12, 2021 · 12 comments
Closed

review discovery metadata and search standards #10

tomkralidis opened this issue May 12, 2021 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
for review help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested wcmp

Comments

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary and Purpose
As part of our efforts on the next version of WCMP (#101), we need to perform an analysis and inventory or metadata and search standards used in various portals/websites in the earth science domain.

Proposal
@wmo-im/tt-wismd members to provide examples of search portals/website in their respective countries (and/or other countries if they are involved/aware).

Reason
Having a better idea of the use of search and metadata standards will help in the definition of future WCMP as well as search standards for WIS 2.0.

cc @efucile @amilan17 @joergklausen

@tomkralidis tomkralidis added help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested for review labels May 12, 2021
@amilan17
Copy link
Member

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Comments on @amilan17 's entries:

  • data.gov also supports ISO 19115 and OGC:CSW, OAI-PMH, SRU, OpenSearch
  • same with data.noaa.gov

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

2021-05-21

  • from @josusky

    • ICAO SWIM
      • registry of services
    • may be difficult to decipher what's being used
  • @jsieland

    • service descriptions/metadata
    • XML -> JSON

@jsieland
Copy link
Contributor

Here are some links regarding SWIM:

Additional quick background info (from what I can recall):

  • There are three Specifications for SWIM Services:
    • TI Yellow Profile: foundation for technical implementation
    • Service Description: how to describe a service
    • Information Definition: how to describe the information/data provided by the service; an Information Definition is part of a SWIM Service Description
  • it is (at least to me) not clear how the SWIM Registry validate the uploaded JSON Service Descriptions
    • the JSON Schema is somehow based on that validation.....
  • a service is SWIM compliant if it passes the validation against the JSON schema for compliant SWIM Services
    • the minimum set which is necessary to publish a service is a so-called Candidate (it requires less mandatory elements). A Candidate need to evolve to compliant within two years.
    • there are also Service Definitions. These types can be seen as some kind of templates which should promote best practice. This type has the least mandatory elements.
    • there are seperate JSON schema files for "compliant / candidate / definition"
  • to include some ICAO context there is ongoing work on Service Overview (https://ext.eurocontrol.int/swim_confluence/display/SWIM/Service+Overview)

@josusky
Copy link
Contributor

josusky commented May 24, 2021

Many thanks, @jsieland . I will need some time to read and digest all this.

@martaguti
Copy link

Hi there,
I thought I drop this in here as it is an interesting "metadata crosswalk across different metadata formats for Earth Sciences,marine,climate and general purpose. ISO19115-2, CMIP6, DataCite, schema.org, DCAT, OGC EO (among others)

https://zenodo.org/record/4744768#.YOGJ4C1Q3T8

It was presented at the Metadata Task Force group for the EOSC symposium 2021. Work done by the UPM (Universidad Politècnica de Madrid) for the Reliance project. Presentations in YouTube available

ps:I have not escaped the metadata catalogues world :-)

@gaubert
Copy link
Contributor

gaubert commented Jul 4, 2021

@martaguti interesting Thanks a lot. Could you also link the youtube presentation because the zenodo record only links to a very dry spreadsheet.

Thanks a lot and sorry for the fact that you still have to deal with metadata catalogue :-D

@martaguti
Copy link

@gaubert
see deliverable D4.1 DataCube Metadata model
https://box.pionier.net.pl/d/529599305c0e43d9bf28/

Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvtWJWsMLRg&list=PLbISfqJh3Tstmx6CgrBmYI7lyyVXiY5VE&index=13

metadata: it's our fate , like a boomerang comes back to us :-)

@gaubert
Copy link
Contributor

gaubert commented Jul 5, 2021

@martaguti Great many thanks for the links.

@tomkralidis tomkralidis transferred this issue from wmo-im/wcmp Apr 14, 2022
@amilan17
Copy link
Member

@tomkralidis I think we can close this

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tomkralidis commented May 22, 2023

Summary: given the current state of the art and the scope / granularity of resource discovery for WIS2, OGC API - Records has been adopted for resource discovery (datasets, services, processes), for both the model (i.e. WCMP2 as a profile of the "Record Core" requirements class) and the API machinery ("Record API" requirements class) as part of the WIS2 Global Discovery Catalogue (GDC).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
for review help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested wcmp
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants