You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fair enough, it just seemed odd at first glance to have an odd release this close to v22 going LTS, but yeah, makes sense to wait, and in the meantime, no reason to rush to drop support for v21.
The
engines
fields in the various*package.json
files currently have:As per https://nodejs.org/en/about/previous-releases#release-schedule, seems like it's about time to replace v21 with v22?
Oh, hmm, reading https://docs.astro.build/en/upgrade-astro/#support, kinda seems like v22 won't be added until it is the current LTS (scheduled for November-ish), is that right?
Very minor, not particularly high priority, just thought I'd call it out.
Related PR: #10689 (bumped
v18.14.1
tov18.20.1
)*: There are 13
package.json
files, they all have the same"node"
field, butpackages/astro/package.json
also adds ranges fornpm
&pnpm
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: