Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for running the Security 3.0.2 TCK #161

Closed
scottmarlow opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #162
Closed

Add support for running the Security 3.0.2 TCK #161

scottmarlow opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #162

Comments

@scottmarlow
Copy link
Contributor

scottmarlow commented Jul 9, 2024

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-19513 is the WildFly tracker for being able to run against the Security 3.0.2 TCK which should soon be promoted for the TCK challenge jakartaee/security#297 (promotion will be coordinated via jakartaee/specifications#764).

It seems that we either have to use the default (Tomcat) OpenID Connect Server being started in a few tests or provide our own OpenID impl for the two tests mentioned in jakartaee/security#297 (comment)

Currently, I see two different side effects of Tomcat being started by the Security 3.0.2 TCK tests. https://gist.github.com/scottmarlow/50802d6a60ca5228fa92d207b4d44a78 shows some unexpected (by me) test output from tomcat in the TCK testing in the form of a Tomcat stack trace and after that for a different test, we see Address already in use /127.0.0.1:8443 error which likely happens due to Tomcat still being in memory.

@scottmarlow
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not sure if we should use the Apache Tomcat OpenID Connect Server or something like https://wildfly-security.github.io/wildfly-elytron/blog/securing-wildfly-apps-openid-connect/

@jamezp
Copy link
Member

jamezp commented Jul 9, 2024

Do we have a choice? Everything is pretty hard-coded in the TCK and it might be rather difficult to replace it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants