-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
/
Copy pathpaper.lyx
1164 lines (1001 loc) · 41.4 KB
/
paper.lyx
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
#LyX 2.0 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 413
\begin_document
\begin_header
\textclass article
\use_default_options true
\maintain_unincluded_children false
\language english
\language_package default
\inputencoding auto
\fontencoding global
\font_roman default
\font_sans default
\font_typewriter default
\font_default_family default
\use_non_tex_fonts false
\font_sc false
\font_osf false
\font_sf_scale 100
\font_tt_scale 100
\graphics default
\default_output_format default
\output_sync 0
\bibtex_command default
\index_command default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single
\use_hyperref false
\papersize a4paper
\use_geometry false
\use_amsmath 1
\use_esint 1
\use_mhchem 1
\use_mathdots 1
\cite_engine basic
\use_bibtopic false
\use_indices false
\paperorientation portrait
\suppress_date false
\use_refstyle 1
\index Index
\shortcut idx
\color #008000
\end_index
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\paragraph_indentation default
\quotes_language english
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\tracking_changes false
\output_changes false
\html_math_output 0
\html_css_as_file 0
\html_be_strict false
\end_header
\begin_body
\begin_layout Title
WeTube
\end_layout
\begin_layout Title
the new revolutionary p2p media provider
\end_layout
\begin_layout Abstract
WeTube comes in a time in which we are seeing enormous efforts from the
people to overcome the problems of censorship and central information control
over all Internet.
Notorious are the examples of YouTube, Vimeo, and other regulated places.
YouTube itself, for example, is directly censored in many countries (
\begin_inset Flex URL
status collapsed
\begin_layout Plain Layout
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_Censorship
\end_layout
\end_inset
), impeding people to access to the biggest media database available today
for humans, and therefore making a precious source of information not available
for human evolution and free interchange of information.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Abstract
But not only censorship occur to websites, but also the websites themselves
are obliged to censor many of the contents that the users upload, many
times to adjust to arbitrary regulations that are imposed by a few, only
serve a few, and restrict the majority.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Abstract
We believe this is a serious problem, and we should overcome it by the means
we can for the moment: technology.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Abstract
We are happy to present here a good solution, and we expect that the technology
expressed in this document can make you excited enough to understand the
big implications that this is going to achieve very soon.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Abstract
We extort you to join us.
We truly need you, as this is a movement from humans to humans.
Please read on.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Section*
The three pillars of WeTube: freedom, privacy, voluntary moderation
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Imagine a web page where you can upload any video, music, image or document,
and it will be immediately available to everybody without restrictions,
without anybody knowing who you are (if you want), without anybody censoring
you.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Imagine a web page where you can access any media you want without anybody
having to know what are you doing, not being imposed to authenticate with
your real ID, IP, or associated credit card number, not being observed
by the big brother, and at the same time the content you access is of high
quality and helpful for your evolution and relationships.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Imagine you are a publisher, a journalist or an editor, and there is a place
where you can safely publish your discoverings, but without any censorship
at all, while at the same time you are able to get rid of the junk and
noise around you, providing only good quality researches and associations
with you audience.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Imagine you are an artist that lives for and from your art, and you have
a free place where you can express your ideas and concepts, participate
in community with your followers and other artists, and even earn the money
you deserve for your hard work, without imposing others and not having
to pay big commissions to any private editor or distributor, nor having
to support their greed and censorship.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Imagine a media where you can get rid of the junk so easy as doing a click.
Imagine being your own moderator, where you can select what is good and
bad for yourself and your family, without having to surrender yourself
to what other has decided, specially when that other is trying to impose
you a vision you don't agree with.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Imagine a place where you can choose multiple moderators, including yourself
or no moderators at all, being them people and organizations you really
trust, and the possibility to add or remove them without restriction.
Imagine how good a free moderator could be if their motivation is to serve
only what people want while removing what they don't, not what a big guy
on top of him/her decides.
Moderators with big impositions and bad appliance of filters would be rapidly
abandoned by the community, and their reputation diminished.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Imagine that the media you see is temporally stored on your computer so
you can see it multiple times without having to reload it.
Imagine that the content you like most is permanently stored on your computer
so if you lost your internet connection you can still access it.
Imagine a safeguard of all the important media you have in case of media
server shutdowns, human crisis, war, or government censorship.
You don't have that in today's standard media providers, as they prohibit
you to store the content.
Even companies like Google prohibits the publishing of browsers add-ons
that use a trick to record the media, making YouTube videos very difficult
to get stored locally with the Chrome browser.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Imagine that you are a legit entrepreneur and have a useful and good business
that you need to promote.
The audience of this new media provider will be large and a real opportunity
for you to come in.
Every single area of business you can think of is covered, and you'll be
able to perfectly select the categories you want to be in.
Even better is the fact that advertisers can select to what moderation
they want to be attached, so you can perfectly choose moderators who provide
legal only content in your country.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Imagine that you are a programmer and/or a system administrator and you
want your deserved reward for your hard work while being useful to humanity.
You can host a server and earn bitcoins proportional to the amount of bandwidth
, space and maintenance you serve.
At the same time, the protocol is specially designed to protect you against
the arbitrary laws, as you can select which moderators you're going to
serve, and therefore, the content your server helps the user to download.
But not even that, most of the contents are actually not stored in your
servers, but interchanged between users alone, making this protocol a really
distributed anonymous one.
We even optionally protect your IP with a technology similar to hidden
Tor services if you want to serve delicate searches, at only the cost of
some added latency.
You are a crucial part of this revolution.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Section*
Is this another moderated system?
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Yes and no.
It is moderated in the sense that oneself can be the moderator, or relay
the task to a trusted moderator or a group of moderators.
The magic of this system is that it allows full freedom, while maintaining
the convenience of good-quality results and potential legality, as explained
bellow.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
First things first.
In WeTube, there is a root moderator called
\begin_inset Quotes eld
\end_inset
unmoderator
\begin_inset Quotes erd
\end_inset
which accepts everything and cannot be violated in any form.
This moderator resides in no place and all its content is purely in the
cloud of users.
Not a single part of this moderator content and searches resides in any
server, except if the server administrator decides so, which s/he must
explicitly configure to.
This moderator fulfills freedom and zero discrimination, which unfortunately
includes low quality results and potentially some illegal content in some
countries.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
You can compare this unmoderator with raw eMule, Tor hidden services, Gnutella,
Kademlia, and other p2p protocols offering searches and/or magnet links.
One who has used those programs knows that the results are more often than
not of very low quality, when not illegal or honeypots.
But yet, people use those programs because of censorship and copyright
issues in their countries, so they accept the junk in favor to obtain some
valuable content.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
That drives us to a problem: because no moderation is taken place, both
the quality and legality of the content is diminished, and most people
don't use them because of that.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
So, what to do? We don't want to be illegal, and at the same time we want
full access to quality content which is censored in central mainstream
medias.
We also want privacy, one thing which we don't have today unless we use
very complicated technology.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
The point here is: you can't have legality and good quality content in an
unmoderated system.
After a while, the system will be full of junk and legally dangerous staff.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
So we introduce moderators.
But let the thing be WELL done.
We choose to be OUR OWN moderators.
Certainly not a good thing for oppressive business and governments, who
want to be the only one moderators (we should call them oppressive censurers,
or just fascists), but still a good thing for governments and entrepreneurs
who embrace freedom and really take care of their citizens/clients.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
When a user enters in the WeTube network, s/he is usually attached to a
moderator which only censors things which are not relevant to the theme
s/he is attached to.
For example, one moderator can specialize only on providing news, throwing
out the rest.
Another moderator could provide a good collection of music of a specific
style.
There could be also more general moderators which only accepts everything
which is legal in his/her country.
And there could be another interesting type of moderator which accept content
which is censored in his/her country, but that content is globally considered
good in the rest of the world, making him/herself an activist pro human
rights against dictatorships.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
A user of WeTube always can choose whose moderators s/he wants.
He is presented with a default, which is usually a group of moderators
which keeps things legal.
But s/he can all ways choose to exit that moderation, or combine with others.
Yes, multiple moderators are allowed, but interesting enough, the system
allows also to be attached only to
\begin_inset Quotes eld
\end_inset
unmoderated
\begin_inset Quotes erd
\end_inset
(moderators themselves enter in this mode to pick good staff throughout
filtering).
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Anyone can be a moderator and no personal information is required.
Just register a nick and go to the moderation area, and there you got it.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Now it is time to introduce the concept of WeTube entry points:
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsection*
The entrance to the world of WeTube
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
The p2p programs are a problem in themselves.
They require the user to install an application in their computers and
configure things.
The learning curve is also usually high, and passing links to another person
is complicate because requires both sides to have the program installed
and configured.
Another important problem is that those programs are not really real-time,
so the user must wait for the entire media to download in order to start
watching it, which is extremely slow and inconvenient.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
So we propose a very nice solution: WeTube can run in your browser and in
your mobile device, so you can pass links around, use a nice interface,
embed videos in your blogs, send by email, and do with the content all
the things you can actually do with with any page.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
But, because WeTube is in fact a p2p protocol, with thousands of servers
and users connected to it and making it run, the web is only one of the
possible interfaces.
As a protocol, it can run on web-pages, but also in the form of applications
which uses the WeTube libraries to present themselves in other convenient
forms.
Desktop applications and mobile applications are perfectly possible.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
The average user will use a simple web interface as his/her entry point.
Many WeTube servers will also provide an entry point that will download
the JavaScript program that runs in the browser, which is in fact the interface
for WeTube.
Optionally, every entry point to WeTube can choose their default moderators,
and even disallow the users to select moderators which provide illegal
material, just to avoid legal issues.
Of course, in this case, the user can change the entry point for another
less restricted that allows more moderators, or simply download a full-featured
browser extension with unlimited access.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
The matter of allowing entry points to be fully moderated has many advantages:
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
The site itself can avoid legal issues.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
A site that is meant to provide content for just one specific area, for
example, news or scientific, can filter the rest out.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
A site with content only allowed for children, could be considered safe
and can provide only useful and educative content for them, filtering out
violence or sex, and also boring things.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Those sites are also a way to promote WeTube itself.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Section*
The rise of privacy
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Privacy is a big problem today.
Corporations and governments keep track of everything yo do, and use the
information they collect from you to make a profile of your personality
that they then use to impose certain things and make decisions.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
People tend to think that the information they collect from them is just
for advertising purposes, but that is only a tiny part.
And I will put some examples:
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
The main target are libertarians, anarcho-socialist, anti-capitalists, anarcho-c
aptitalists, communist, people aware of their rights as citizens, artists,
media distributors (incorrectly named
\begin_inset Quotes eld
\end_inset
hackers
\begin_inset Quotes erd
\end_inset
), protesters, open source activists, many minorities, people protesting
against governments regulations, people protesting against monopolies,
scientific out of the statuesque, and more.
In a sense: people who embrace freedom, whether they are from the left
or the right.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Wars are used as an excuse to impose vigilance and coercion against the
people.
Actual corporations want to earn money, yes, but the point is that, meanwhile,
they are a tool to impose censorship and control.
Any good company who is worried about their clients privacy is usually
forced to give all the information they gather to government agencies.
And this is happening in most countries, some more than others.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
But we believe in freedom and self-responsability.
And privacy is vital at this point, because we must protect ourselves against
censorship.
It doesn't matter what you have to say, what are your ideas, if you can't
spare them.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Important is also your economic privacy.
Remember that most media providers requires you to give your credit card
number in order to start downloading media, even if it is free media.
iTunes and Google Play are examples.
When you give your credit card to them, not only are you de-facto telling
them who you are exactly, but you are telling banks and therefore government
agencies what are you doing with your money.
This is a very strong form of coercion to artists too, because that implies
that only artists approved by them can reach a sufficient audience to make
a life.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
So we embrace Bitcoin and derivatives for the economic parts of WeTube,
because it allows anonymous and non-coercible transactions.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
More importantly, we base our identity parts in Keyhotee, that has an impressive
list of privacy and security features, including the possibility to register
any nick in a completely distributed network, not owned by anybody, and
therefore out of the information collectors.
This is the only way today to obtain real private anonymous IDs.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Of course, we also protect your IP.
Even if you need an internet connection to connect to WeTube, in the very
moment you enter into it, your privacy is guarantied because all data travels
encrypted and completely distributed.
So the only thing that a man in the middle can see is that you are connected
to WeTube, but cannot know what are you truly doing.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsection*
But what about criminals? Couldn't they have impunity in this system?
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
They can't have impunity because this is a moderated system.
Criminal activities should be immediately rejected by most moderators.
Illegalities could also be cut-off.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Yes, they could still broadcast media to the unmoderated area, but that
area will be mostly ignored by normal people.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
We believe that if you try to censor terrorists or psychopaths, the only
thing you will obtain is a stronger response from those groups, and motivate
them to use actual physical forces.
Most moderators and users do understand that the best they can do is ignore
criminals, or even better: create content that severely expose their badness
and identities by investigations.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Also, we should consider that most people are actually good people and don't
like violence.
Most of the biggest threads to humanity did precisely came from wars and
false-flag actions, of course motivated by the dark sides of governments
and bankers.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Section*
Economic incentives
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
WeTube is a Distributed Autonomous Corporation (DAC), this means that it
is going to have:
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Investors (those who buy its stock).
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Workers, those who sell their art, maintain servers, do the programming,
moderate, promote the site, and also users that share their internet connection.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Clients, those who contract preferential services, pay for art, or advertising
space.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Free clients, those who benefit from the system but don't require special
treatment, which are the majority.
Free clients should have a satisfactory experience without having to pay
anything, like in YouTube.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Dividends! To be automatically paid to workers and investors.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
But, the interesting thing is that anyone without exception can participate
from this entrepreneur.
Lets repeat this very loud:
\end_layout
\begin_layout Paragraph*
IN A DAC, ABSOLUTELY EVERYBODY CAN PARTICIPATE, IT IS ANONYMOUS, PAYMENTS
ARE FULLY AUTOMATIC, THE CORPORATION IS NOT BELONGED TO ANYBODY IN PARTICULAR,
NOR BEING PLACED IN ANY PARTICULAR SERVER.
IT IS FULLY DISTRIBUTED AND AUTOMATED.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
You can buy shares (MediaCoins) and wait for dividends.
Yo can put a server and win dividends.
You can be an artist and receive payments in the form of dividends.
You can be a moderator and be rewarded for you hard work with dividends.
All will be fully automatic, nobody is going to approve or deny you.
And the more you work/invest, the more you're going to obtain.
There are no human contracts to be negotiated or signed.
Every worker/investor/client is free to enter or exit the system in the
way and amount s/he wants.
All algorithms to achieve this are very cleverly programmed.
In fact, the only rules are in the software, based on mathematical facts,
so everybody is treated in function of that.
There is no possible violation nor human intervention in the automated
process.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
This way of constructing business is incredible! In one hand it satisfy
libertarian approaches because it permits investment, innovation, and voluntari
sm, and in the other hand it also satisfies anarcho-socialists because this
is a community of workers that get paid with justice and inviolability,
maintaining their rights and aspirations.
You can think of a DAC like a big autonomous corporation or cooperative
of workers and investors.
And everything is voluntary.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
All payments should be in Bitcoin and/or any other important alt-coin.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
People can buy shares (MediaCoins), so they receive dividends.
Shares of WeTube could become very valuable in the future!
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsection*
Media Coin, the shares of WeTube DAC
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Every single registered user and worker has an associated free MediaCoin
wallet.
MediaCoin is a new virtual coin, representing the shares of the WeTube
stock.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
This is the first virtual currency that is not mined, but earn by actual
work.
This currency is backed up by the work of moderators and servers.
For the first time, there is an intrinsic human value in a virtual currency,
value that comes from direct human work and internet bandwidth.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Every single thing that can be bought in WeTube, uses MediaCoins.
So if you want to pay an artist, you must easily exchange Bitcoins to MediaCoin
s.
We are doing tremendous efforts to ensure that exchanging Bitcoins to MediaCoin
s becomes extremely easy, so we are presenting an exchange page in the main
interface, that every single user can access.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
There are going to be human exchangers, who put their prices for MediaCoins
there, and then the user comes, send his Bitcoins to a coin-address and
get her/his MediaCoins immediately after 3 confirmations.
From there, s/he can do whatever s/he wants with the MediaCoins, including
returning them to his/her Bitcoin wallet.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
There is not going to be any kind of commissions, and manual escrow is not
needed because transactions are fully automated and checked in real time.
This is just wonderful! Escrow is fully automated and free.
How does this work? The MediaCoin seller put MediaCoins in sell mode and
provides a Bitcoin address where to receive payment.
By putting an amount in sell mode, the seller automatically put the MediaCoins
in escrow mode, so he cannot spend those coins for a defined period of
time.
Then the buyer sends the mandatory amount to that Bitcoin address, and
the WeTube network watches it.
When 3 confirmations are made, the system send the MediaCoins to the buyer
from the seller account and finish the escrow.
If the buyer doesn't pay after a period of time, the escrow is released
and MediaCoins return to the seller and become expendable again.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
But even more, having MediaCoins converts you into a investor! So you have
the right to receive dividends.
More on this below.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsubsection*
Earn MediaCoins by sharing
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
WeTube system pays coins to their normal registered users, if they share
their bandwidth and help to propagate content.
Every single time that a user adds one media to favorites, and have the
interface loaded, s/he shares that media, and a distributed algorithm along
all the servers is in charge to calculate the profit, in function of bandwidth
shared.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
There is also a cache configurable by the user, which stores content that
the user watches temporally.
The content of this cache is also shared, but with less preference than
the favorite ones.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
This encourage users to maintain sharing and become a great community, while
providing good broadcast for the most quality pieces.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsection*
The Workers
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsubsection*
Programmers - the great initial winners
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
In you have read something about economics of Bitcoins, DACs and the approach
of Invictus Innovations, all of them are based in the concept of mining.
This has some advantages and disadvantages.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Advantages of mining:
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
You attract a lot of investors and other people interested in your idea.
You only have to see the impressive success of Protoshares and how thousands
of people got involved into it the first week.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
People worry about your project and encourage the adoption of it.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
However, it has also serious disadvantages:
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Real workers are not motivated to do any programming, so you must centralize
this task and put money of your own to overcome it in the form of bounties.
This is ironic, as you pursue decentralization but you obtain the contrary:
centralization of human resources, at great cost.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Many criminals mine virtually for free, using botnets, a form of virus that
steal computer power from infected computers of innocents.
They obtain at least 1000 more shares this way than an individual.
And solutions to end up this are not clear nor efficient.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
It is my opinion that a DAC of this characteristics should not be driven
by the greed of eventual hackers.
It is also my opinion that the persons who do most of the efforts should
be the initial shareholders of this company, just like it happens in the
real world.
Do you imagine Steve Jobs doing what he did knowing that he had only 0.0001%
of the company he just created? No, he had a good share because he took
the risks and has the ideas (it is irrelevant if after some years he sold
them).
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
So I propose something that would not like very much to speculators, but
certainly will motivate programmers and serious investors to do serious
work here.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
My proposition is to centralize the capital in a group of programmers EXACTLY
ONLY for the INITIAL phase of the project until we have the first alpha
released to the world.
I mean: the initial shares of the company are equally distributed to the
programmers, only in function of the amount of code/art/documentation they
write manually.
We can debate how amounts are measured.
And, after the release of the software, the company becomes COMPLETELY,
without exception, DECENTRALIZED.
This is the equivalent of the actual way in which most companies start:
first it comes the idea, then comes the partners who do the initial work,
and then, if the company has succeed, it goes to the stock market.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
This way, the programmers will obtain their part with justice, their work
will be rapidly rewarded once the system if fully functional, in the form
of dividends.
And because they obtain a good part of it, this project should become very
primordial in their minds.
They should be very motivated to maintain the source code in the future
because they have a proper share that they don't want to drop in value.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Compare this with a programmer who has been paid a simple bounty.
S/he would have no further motivation to maintain it.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
My proposition is to form a democratic virtual cooperative of programmers
in which everybody who contributes can share her/his ideas, with the compromise
to obtain their shares one day before the launch and then become investors.
After that moment, WeTube DAC will be maintained by its workers (artists,
moderators, clients and servers), but the programmers will still have the
important role and motivation of maintaining the software itself.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Because I know that there are people who want to invest but don't have any
skills to contribute, we can also create a ProtoMediaShares, similar to
what Protoshares is, that could be converted to WeTube DAC's shares at
the launch, at some proportion.
We are open to this proposition if we still give programmers something
like 3/4 of the total initial shares.
But some shares could be given to miners-only with a moral condition: please
promote WeTube!
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Our intention to develop this initial political system is precisely to encourage
the initial decentralization of human resources, which are the most valuable
of them all, and without them we can only fail and give power to people
who don't really want to get involved but just get rich without having
to do nothing.
Think about this question: would you give shares of your company to someone
who steals money from someone else? He will steal from you when he find
the proper moment, too.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
After the initial share partition upon programmers (and probably some miners
that act as promoters), people can invest in the usual ways for WeTube:
by serving, by uploading content, by moderating, or just by buying shares
in the Bitshares market.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
How do we know when to do the partition for the programmers and become fully
decentralized? Very simple: when we start to operate and receive the first
clients, so we are forced to become a BitAsset and operate on Bitshares
market.
This comes exactly at the same time that the first alpha release happens,
the same time at which the original block of our block-chain is released.
From there on, WeTube DAC is fully decentralized an it is on its own.
:)
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
And what part of the stock do we reserve for programmers and miners? I propose
10% for programmers and 2.5% for miners.
The 87.5% left is reserved for workers to be earn slowly once the system
starts running.
10% is really a lot if we consider that this DAC could become the next
YouTube.
Imagine you do about 10% of the programming, that would give you 1% of
the total shares that WeTube will ever have, which would convert you in
a millionaire in some years.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
So please consider yourself all this matter.
This is a serious business we have here, and a real opportunity.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsubsection*
Managers / marketers / modelers
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
A project of this size/repercussion, cannot go far without thinkers.
Every single area of this DAC needs delicate analysis and modeling.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
In the traditional structure of a company, you normally have departments
and directors.
Directors mandate a way of working and ensure that everybody is working
in the correct direction.
This imposes a hierarchy.
And we don't want that.
We want freedom, voluntarism, and a way to compensate everybody only in
function of their work.
We would like this DAC to be flat and auto managed.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
But, let me be very clear on this: while we want full freedom, we also need
proper analysis and direction.
So, how to achieve both?
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
I have this idea, that I hope everybody can agree with.
I call it distributed management, where everybody can become a manager,
and where real experts can obtain their proper retribution with their thinking.
They will not receive more or less money than programmers, instead they
will work together to model the necessary political details.
Many times, but not all the times, one will be both a manager and a programmer,
which is fantastic!
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Every manager has the important task to model the details of the protocols
and characteristics of the system.
Some examples of different areas that require management:
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
p2p protocol modelers, to ensure privacy and performance.
This is the core of WeTube, and the most important task.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Marketing, or how to encourage adoption of the system, while maintaining
the delicate balance between profit and user enthusiasm.
This department is mainly about the business model.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Economists and currency experts in charge of MediaCoin, working together
with marketing guys.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Legal advisers.
Their analysis are vital to avoid legal issues.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Social thinkers, whose task is to think about the interface behavior and
net-inter-relations between users and/or moderators.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Programmer's coordinators.
Very important to ensure communication and the application of ideas.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Spokesmen, doing conferences/videos to promote the system.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
Moderators, to avoid abuses (for example, someone tries to write very redundantl
y or write code in an unnatural way to augment the number of lines).
\end_layout
\begin_layout Itemize
And general coordination, in charge of the original idea, trying to put
everything together.
I will assume this task, but will obtain the shares in the same proportion
and conditions as the rest.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Every area may require several managers/thinkers.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
So I propose that managers can get their shares in the system by writing
papers, and their retribution will be in proportion on how much they need
to write.
Every manager should write one or more papers with a detailed analysis
of the needs, and a suggested model to achieve the objectives.
Then, this paper is passed to programmers and they implement the ideas.
At the same time, a programmer can work with the manager to propose changes,
or the programmer him/herself can become a manager if that area is empty
or the actual manager is not competent/open minded enough.
In case of severe conflict, a meeting will take place with the rest of
the team, and we'll decide together by consensus.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Shares will be paid in the moment of the launch, so rejected writings of
previous modifications will not count.
I suggest that everybody will obtain their shares in proportion to the
number of lines s/he wrote, the same that happens with programmers.
In case of graphics/drawings, we could agree that they cost something like
20 lines each.
More if they are logos.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsubsection*
Moderators
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsubsection*
Servers
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsubsection*
Entry Points
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsection*
The Clients
\end_layout
\begin_layout Subsubsection*
Free users
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Most of the clients of this system will be free users.
They just enter the system from a moderated entry point, or via a browser
extension which allows to change the moderators.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
They don't have to pay for viewing anything, but yet, they can in case they
want to support artists or editors.
Payment is always voluntary.
\end_layout
\begin_layout Standard
Users can always choose their own moderators in the browser extension version,
and even become moderators themselves whenever they want.