Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Guides - Use with Docker #44

Closed
joshwiens opened this issue Jul 20, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed

Guides - Use with Docker #44

joshwiens opened this issue Jul 20, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@joshwiens
Copy link
Member

joshwiens commented Jul 20, 2016

Stub.

With the performance increases coming in the Docker Beta ( now public ) web development in an isolated Docker environment has not only become practical but extremely useful.

Goal: Guide to setup & configuration of both Docker & Webpack2 with examples covering all aspects of the development workflow using Webpack2 from dev build to prod bundling as well as dev server, watch, hmr, tree shaking & so on.

@bebraw - Assuming you like the idea, could i get a stub for How To - Docker and I will begin to outline the proposal in detail ( already have a whiteboard full of notes, concepts & examples ).

IMO this document, given it's scope should live outside of How To: Use with third party tools 74b90c4

//cc @TheLarkInn

@bebraw
Copy link
Contributor

bebraw commented Jul 20, 2016

Sounds good to me. I don't mind adding a stub.

I still have some work to do with my PR. Hopefully we get that merged soon.

@joshwiens
Copy link
Member Author

That's fine, all the docker stuff will take a bit of time

@bebraw bebraw changed the title How To - Docker How to - Use with Docker Jul 24, 2016
@bebraw
Copy link
Contributor

bebraw commented Jul 24, 2016

There's a stub now. So I would say it's safe to PR against the develop branch once you look into it.

@SpaceK33z
Copy link
Member

@d3viant0ne, is this still something you're interested in? Otherwise I could work on this after I've finished #26. I've never used Docker before though (but this can be a good thing), so if anyone else wants to do it, that's fine.

@skipjack skipjack changed the title How to - Use with Docker Guides - Use with Docker Feb 1, 2017
@skipjack
Copy link
Collaborator

@d3viant0ne @SpaceK33z are either of you still interested in this? Imho this might make more sense as a blog post that we then link to from somewhere in the docs but I don't feel too strongly about it. In the end we may wind up with an Integrations section (instead of just a single page) that contains things like this, Typescript, and other integrations. The main goal imo is to keep the core guides separate and more visible than any third-party integration discussions.

@joshwiens
Copy link
Member Author

@skipjack - I have completely forgotten about this. I still have the draft docs buried on my ssd somewhere but I see your point about moving this to a different section of the documentation.

No argument from me on that point.

@skipjack
Copy link
Collaborator

skipjack commented Jul 3, 2017

Ah great, well if you want to PR what you have we can sort out how it's organized in #438. Or if you'd rather wait on it for now or just move it to a blog post I suggest we close for now and re-open down the road if anything.

Happy to help facilitate whatever direction you choose. I'm just trying to move some of these older issues forward.

@joshwiens
Copy link
Member Author

Honestly, Docker anything is usually very purpose built. Even if I threw up a guide, I few it would only lead to a bunch of questions related to trying to turn a generic example into something that works in a particular CI / CD chain or local development workflow.

If the question comes up a lot in the future, I can resurrect a doc on the subject but most of what I see used now is Docker for supporting stack & webpack-dev-server on the host.

We can clean this up for now & revisit the topic in the future if there is a need.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants