Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(karma-webpack): disable optimization by default (webpack >= v4.0.0) #325

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2018

Conversation

scottohara
Copy link
Contributor

@scottohara scottohara commented May 5, 2018

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

For webpack 4, the presence of optimization.splitChunks and optimization.runtimeChunk causes karma to hang at the message 'Compiled successfully' (#322)

What is the new behavior?

A workaround is for end-users to set these two properties to false in their webpack/karma configs; however it would make more sense to have karma-webpack do this in all cases, so that new users aren't left scratching their heads as to why their test suite won't run.

Type

  • Bugfix

Issues

SemVer

  • Fix (🏷 Patch)

Checklist

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

@jsf-clabot
Copy link

jsf-clabot commented May 5, 2018

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@ryanclark
Copy link
Collaborator

@scottohara I've been working on karma being able to serve the virtual files generated by webpack, so this isn't needed as it'll support multiple chunks, etc. Let me know if you want to collaborate on it!

@scottohara
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rynclark That's great news.

I was beginning to wonder if this project had been abandoned, as there had been little to no activity over the past month, and v4.0.0-beta.0 (required for [email protected]) was released nearly 2 months ago with no further updates since then.

So its good to hear that someone else is working on solutions for karma-webpack to play nicely with [email protected].

@edmorley
Copy link

edmorley commented Jun 7, 2018

I've been working on karma being able to serve the virtual files generated by webpack, so this isn't needed as it'll support multiple chunks, etc.

Would it be possible to merge/release this PR in the meantime? For users who haven't discovered the workaround, #322 is a complete blocker for being able to use karma-webpack with webpack 4.

@ryanclark
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah I don't see why not. The update to karma-webpack has been taking longer than expected

@edmorley
Copy link

Yeah I don't see why not. The update to karma-webpack has been taking longer than expected

Gentle ping :-)

@ryanclark
Copy link
Collaborator

@edmorley I’m not the one who makes the decision I’m afraid 😔

@edmorley
Copy link

@michael-ciniawsky ^ :-)

@michael-ciniawsky michael-ciniawsky changed the title Disable optimization for webpack 4 (Fixes #322) fix(karma-webpack): disable optimization (webpack >= v4.0.0) Aug 14, 2018
@michael-ciniawsky
Copy link
Contributor

First if all sry for the late response I try to keep things alive here, but this package badly needs some maintainers (actively using it) to make progress in a timely manner :)

I believe this needs to be opened against the next branch (npm i -D karma-webpack@next) instead since v4.0.0-beta.0 is the official version for webpack >= 4.0.0. We should promote it as @latest asap but as mentioned this package currently lacks maintainers, which will always cause delays like this atm :)

@scottohara
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @michael-ciniawsky. I have updated the base branch from master to next.

@michael-ciniawsky michael-ciniawsky changed the title fix(karma-webpack): disable optimization (webpack >= v4.0.0) fix(karma-webpack): disable optimization by default (webpack >= v4.0.0) Aug 29, 2018
@michael-ciniawsky
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going ahead with this along with other pending PR's and try to release a new version in the next few days, potentially including #336 && #338 (⚠️ please help to review ⚠️)

Copy link
Contributor

@michael-ciniawsky michael-ciniawsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@michael-ciniawsky
Copy link
Contributor

Released in v4.0.0-rc.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants