Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor some parts of contract and accounts packages #7197

Conversation

Muhammad-Altabba
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes #7196

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • I have selected the correct base branch.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.
  • I ran npm run lint with success and extended the tests and types if necessary.
  • I ran npm run test:unit with success.
  • I ran npm run test:coverage and my test cases cover all the lines and branches of the added code.
  • I ran npm run build and tested dist/web3.min.js in a browser.
  • I have tested my code on the live network.
  • I have checked the Deploy Preview and it looks correct.
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md file in the root folder.
  • I have linked Issue(s) with this PR in "Linked Issues" menu.

@Muhammad-Altabba Muhammad-Altabba linked an issue Aug 16, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Bundle Stats

Hey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle.

As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted.

Total

Files count Total bundle size % Changed
10 637.83 kB → 639.24 kB (+1.41 kB) +0.22%
Changeset
File Δ Size
../web3-eth-contract/lib/commonjs/contract-deployer-method-class.js 🆕 +6.91 kB 0 B → 6.91 kB
../web3-eth-accounts/lib/commonjs/tx/transactionFactory.js 📈 +286 B (+5.28%) 5.29 kB → 5.57 kB
../web3-eth-contract/lib/commonjs/index.js 📈 +71 B (+2.73%) 2.54 kB → 2.61 kB
../web3-eth-contract/lib/commonjs/contract.js 📉 -4.09 kB (-8.95%) 45.68 kB → 41.59 kB
View detailed bundle breakdown

Added

No assets were added

Removed

No assets were removed

Bigger

Asset File Size % Changed
web3.min.js 618.53 kB → 619.95 kB (+1.41 kB) +0.23%

Smaller

No assets were smaller

Unchanged

Asset File Size % Changed
../lib/commonjs/index.d.ts 8.69 kB 0%
../lib/commonjs/accounts.d.ts 3.89 kB 0%
../lib/commonjs/types.d.ts 2.67 kB 0%
../lib/commonjs/web3.d.ts 1.35 kB 0%
../lib/commonjs/web3_eip6963.d.ts 1.2 kB 0%
../lib/commonjs/abi.d.ts 999 B 0%
../lib/commonjs/eth.exports.d.ts 280 B 0%
../lib/commonjs/providers.exports.d.ts 183 B 0%
../lib/commonjs/version.d.ts 60 B 0%

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Benchmark

Benchmark suite Current: 744c62e Previous: 4f8e8cc Ratio
processingTx 21652 ops/sec (±7.80%) 21886 ops/sec (±6.09%) 1.01
processingContractDeploy 40609 ops/sec (±7.08%) 38750 ops/sec (±9.06%) 0.95
processingContractMethodSend 17382 ops/sec (±6.72%) 15198 ops/sec (±8.03%) 0.87
processingContractMethodCall 27709 ops/sec (±8.37%) 26542 ops/sec (±7.32%) 0.96
abiEncode 45812 ops/sec (±7.01%) 40956 ops/sec (±7.46%) 0.89
abiDecode 30675 ops/sec (±6.99%) 29461 ops/sec (±6.44%) 0.96
sign 1585 ops/sec (±0.81%) 1499 ops/sec (±3.97%) 0.95
verify 372 ops/sec (±0.57%) 355 ops/sec (±0.76%) 0.95

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@Muhammad-Altabba Muhammad-Altabba changed the title [DRAFT] Refactor some parts of contract accounts and eth packages Refactor some parts of contract and accounts packages Aug 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.90909% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.48%. Comparing base (6b80cf0) to head (744c62e).
Report is 17 commits behind head on 4.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              4.x    #7197      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.45%   94.48%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         215      216       +1     
  Lines        8391     8434      +43     
  Branches     2313     2317       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         7926     7969      +43     
  Misses        465      465              
Flag Coverage Δ
UnitTests 94.48% <90.90%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@avkos avkos self-requested a review August 21, 2024 13:23
@avkos
Copy link
Contributor

avkos commented Aug 21, 2024

I've refactored plugin a little bit. now it is not necessary to register a new transaction type. so you can make changes in this PR too

@Muhammad-Altabba
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've refactored plugin a little bit. now it is not necessary to register a new transaction type. so you can make changes in this PR too

Thanks @avkos ,
The changes in this MR for the transaction type registration still fixes an issue that might happen if someone used the this functionality.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactor some parts of Contract, Accounts and Eth packages
3 participants